The testimonies show that CE 369 has two arrows on it. Buell Frazier's came first. Joseph Ball, apparently, pointed to Doorman and asked Fraziier who the guy was. And that direct approach was sensible.

Mr. BALL - Do you recognize this fellow?
Mr. FRAZIER - That is Billy, that is Billy Lovelady.
Mr. BALL - Billy?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right
Mr. BALL - Let's take a marker and make an arrow down that way. That mark is Billy Lovelady?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - That is where you told us you were standing a moment ago.
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - In front of you to the right over to the wall?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Is this a Commission exhibit?
We will make this a Commission Exhibit No. 369.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 369 for identification.)
Mr. BALL - That is written in. The arrow marks Billy Lovelady on Commission's Exhibit No. 369.

But, there was no direct approach with Lovelady. Ball did not point to Doorman and ask him who he was. Why didn't he? The answer is that someone must have warned Ball that Lovelady was balking. So, not wanting to take a chance, he instructed Lovelady to draw an arrow to himself without stating who Doorman was. Note that Lovelady testified in April 1964 and Frazier testified a month before in March 1964. So, Ball gave Lovelady the very same photo on which Frazier had drawn an arrow. 

Mr. BALL - I have got a picture here, Commission Exhibit 369. Are you on that picture?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Take a pen or pencil and mark an arrow where you are.
Mr. LOVELADY - Where I thought the shots are?
Mr. BALL - No; you in the picture.
Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, here (indicating).
Mr. BALL - Draw an arrow down to that; do it in the dark. You got an arrow in the dark and one in the white pointing toward you. Where were you when the picture was taken?
Mr. LOVELADY - Right there at the entrance of the building standing on the the step, would be here (indicating).
Mr. BALL - You were standing on which step?
Mr. LOVELADY - It would be your top level.

So, let's consider that Ball whipped out CE 369, the same photo that Frazier had drawn an arrow on a month before. Why didn't he give Lovelady a fresh photo with no arrow so as not to bias him? It's because he wanted to bias him. And it was after Ball saw where Lovelady drew his arrow that he got crafty. I admit that the IMPLICATION of "You got an arrow in the dark and one in the white pointing toward you" is that the two arrows pointed to the same figure. It's what most people would think. But, that was not the case. And since the marker was black, why would Ball tell Lovelady to draw his arrow in the dark? IT'S BECAUSE WHEN YOU DRAW BLACK ON BLACK, IT DOESN'T SHOW. It was a test, and Lovelady failed it. And I'm sure that afterwards, big men in dark suits and gruff voices paid Lovelady a visit. But fortunately, the "tail" of Lovelady's arrow overlaps the arm of the headless man. So, most of the arrow Lovelady drew was in the black enclosure made by his arms, but a little bit got on the arm, and that's what we can see. And that headless guy is Lovelady. He wasn't really headless, but they had to get rid of his face because they were going to claim that Doorman was him, and they couldn't have two Loveladys. So, Lovelady was standing next to Oswald. This is CE 369 with Frazier's arrow and Lovelady's arrow marked.  

 There was no Prayer Man. He is completely made up. He wasn't Oswald. He wasn't Lovelady. And he wasn't anybody. If you look at the footage, which didn't surface until 30 years later, it is not photographic. It is animation. It is a cartoon. It's also very curde. And everything about it is wrong. It was just 10 seconds after the last shot. So, who are those people? And why are they filing into the TSBD? And where are the peoiple who should be there? And look at how distorted and bizarre they are. Can't you see that it's a freak show?

This Prayer Man ruse was created as a distraction, as a heat sink to draw attention away from Doorman in the Altgens photo, who is Oswald. It was an attempt to create noise, and it's a reflection of the rank evil of the JFK community, which is teeming with Ops.

What we know is that the beginning of the Darnell film captured the doorway, but it was cut out because of what it showed. And I can only guess because it was removed. But then, decades later, after the Darnell film had been circulating without it all that time, the beginning of the film was found as a separate clip, just in time for Oliver Stone's JFK movie.

So, that was 1991, and at the time, nobody claimed that Prayer Man was Oswald. Nobody claimed anything about him. But then, somewhere around 2012, the Prayer Man as Oswald craze started, and it came out of England, which is a hotbed of JFK dis-information. Why? It's because they speak English, and yet, they're far away. There is a similar contingent in Australia, and for the same reason: they speak English but they're far away.

Oswald was the Altgens Doorman, and it is beyond doubt. We can recognize him, his clothing, and his habitual stance, (clasping his hands in front of his body). Don't let yourself be manipulated by JFK-Ops who are working for the other side.

Do you realize that these two men are supposed to be the same man, Billy Lovelady? How dissimilar do two men have to be for you recognize that they are different men?  The man on the right looks like a Neanderthal, or even a gorilla, which is why we call him Gorilla Man. Notice that he has very prominent brow, a short stubby nose, and a long sloping forehead and and a short, forward neck. The man on the left, who looks human, has a longer nose, a less sloping forehead, and a longer and more vertical neck. THEY CAN'T POSSIBLY BE THE SAME MAN BECAUSE THEY DON'T LOOK REMOTELY ALIKE. Yet, they are both claimed to be Billy Lovelady. Why? Because there is no limit to the lies of the desperate killers who killed John F. Kennedy and the people today who protect them and lie for them. Lee Harvey Oswald really was the Man in the Doorway, and the 62 years of lies about it are coming to an end. I know what I'm talking about. Things are happening.  And anyone who tries to tell you that these two are the same man is as corrupt as corruption ever gets.