This is Billy Lovelady and Bill Shelley about a minute after the shooting. The two of them joined the throng of people who flooded the railroad yard. They looked around a little and then returned to work BY WAY OF THE BACK DOOR. They never returned to the front. So, that means the footage supposedly of Lovelady in front 10 minutes after the shooting can't possibly be him .

It is from the Malcolm Couch film, and Gerda Dunkel is the one who found it and posted it.

Notice that Lovelady's arm shows bare skin, above and below his elbow. Hence, he was wearing short-sleeves. So, he can't possibly be the Doorway Man.

To those who will try to deny that it is Shelley and Lovelady: you can't. That's because they said they were there doing that. So, if these two guys are different guys, then they, Shelley and Lovelady, still have to be there. So, if you are going to deny that it's them, then you have to go back to the Couch film and find another set of guys who are them, and in the same spot. Good luck with that.

Gerda had it right. This is Shelley and Lovelady.

 On the left is a group of longshoremen who worked together. I couldn't find a group of warehousemen who worked together, so I settled for that. Notice that every one of them has a distinct look, which isn't surprising since they each have their own DNA. And notice that every single one of them is wearing a unique, distinctive outfit of clothes. No two of them are dressed the same. Yet, we are supposed to believe that Oswald and Lovelady looked and dressed in the startling likeness that we see on Oswald and Doorman.

It is almost 2025. It isn't the Dark Ages. Recognizing that the two images on the right are of the same man wearing the same clothes should be instantaneous. That's because we have been looking at people our whole lives, their unique characteristics and their unique clothing from the vast world of clothing.

Nobody could be stupid enough to honestly think that two unrelated men just happened to look, and dress, that much alike.

It isn't about seeing. It's about wanting. I mean wanting Oswald not to be the man in the doorway because it rattles your paradigm.

Well, snap the pluck out of it because he WAS the man in the doorway. And this is me, rhetorically, splashing a cup of cold water in the faces of the deniers.

 It's fortunate that we know the heights and weights of both Oswald and Lovelady. Oswald was weighed and measured by the Dallas Police, and they found him to be 5'9", 131 pounds. I learned that directly from Professor Gerald McKnight, of Hood College, the author of Breach of Trust, and one of the early and most ardent advocates of Oswald in the doorway. I spoke to him, at length, over the phone, several times. He died in 2021.

Lovelady was weighed and measured by the FBI, and they reported him to be 5'8" 170 pounds.

So, we're talking about a 40 pound difference, in which the shorter man was the heavier one.

And, it is certainly reasonable to assume that such a Laurel and Hardy difference would show up in photographs, just as it does in films.

But, when you look at Doorman and Oswald, they look exactly the same in their physicality. They both look lean and asthenic. They look like they were the same weight. That's because they were the same weight, being the same man.

Folks, the Bloodied will never admit it, but it undeniably true that Doorman was Oswald. And when I say "undeniably" I mean except for the ability of anybody to claim anything. Like the little boy with cookie crumbs all over his face and hands, who continues to deny that he raided the cookie jar, these people will persist in their denials. But, I am pointing to logic here, that there is no weight and size difference between these two men. There is simply no way that one was 40 pounds heavier than the other and an inch shorter.

You know that I made a movie about the trial over the murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer, who was the last mistress of JFK. And in the trial, famed Civil Rights Attorney Dovey Roundtree hammered the jury with the fact that the State's star witness, Henry Wiggins, claimed that the man he saw was 5'8" and 185 pounds, while the defendant Raymond Crump was only 5' 3 1/2" and 130 pounds. That's what it said on his driver's license.

I have the transcript of the trial. It can't be found online. So, I went to the cousin of Mary Pinchot Meyer, Mike Pinchot, and got it from him. I am posting part of Dovey's Closing Argument to the jury. She told them to look at the defendant, whom she referred to as Exhibit A, and ask themselves if he is 185 pounds. And if he's not, then they need to acquit him.

It's the same situation here because when looking at Oswald and Doorman, if you can see that there is not a 40 pound weight difference between them, then you know they can't be Oswald and Lovelady, that they must be Oswald and Oswald. Listen to Dovey.

 It is actually insane to claim that these are not the same man, Lee Harvey Oswald, because the likeness is so great. .The shape of the face, the length of the neck (which varies a lot among people) the depth and spacing of the eyes, the shape of the nose, as well as the ears, the width of the mouth, and shape of the chin. To suggest that another man looked that much like him is absurd. But, added to it is the fact that they are obviously wearing the same clothes; the same outfit, including the same ruffled t-shirt with the stretched, sunken collar, plus the outer shirt that is unbuttoned, with the grainy texture, with the same flat collar and the furl beneath it. To suggest that another man not only looked that much like him but also dressed that much like him is insane.

 You should watch this video of CIA Chief William Colby testifying to the Church Committee in 1975. In it, he explains that the CIA developed a special gun, a modified 38, that fired a frozen dart that was armed with shellfish toxin, a deadly nerve agent, that could travel 100 meters. The sound it made was very low amplitude, and on impact, it felt like nothing more than a mosquito bite. But, it was capable of killing, and it was designed to kill.

They used that gun to incapacitate JFK, both physically and mentally, before he reached the Kill Zone. He was shot as soon as the limo completed the horseshoe turn from Houston to Elm. The shot was taken from a low floor in the Dal-Tex building, directly behind him. And the distance of the shot was much less than 100 meters, which was the range of the gun according to Colby. So, it was within range.

And there is no doubt about this because we can see the effects of the poisoning in the Zapruder film, where JFK has lost control of his muscles. He is in tetanic spasm, and even Jackie was unnerved by it. With her hands, she tried to coax him to put his arm down, but he didn't. He couldn't. In fact, his tetany spread. It worsened as he sat there. And the fact is that he may have died from it if he hadn't been shot again and died from that because it may have spread to his respiratory muscles and prevented him from breathing. That is how people die from strychnine poisoning.

But, he also suffered a complete mental collapse. He lost his ability to speak. And, it wasn't because he was shot in the throat because it didn't damage his larynx. And if a mentally sound person is unable to speak, he or she will try to communicate another way, such gesturing, pointing, demonstrating. But, Kennedy's mind was gone. It was like he had a frontal lobotomy.

And it may have been more than one toxin in that ice flechette. It may have been a cocktail of agents to physically and mentally incapacitate him.

Now listen to William Colby. And remember that he died under very suspicious circumstances.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?408557-1/william-colby-church-committee-testimony

 Some are trying to claim that the circled lamppost in Willis is the one that was close to the Stemmons Freeway sign, but it's not. It was definitely closer than that. You can see how close it was in the Jim Ryan photo on the right. What it means is that the Willis photo is dirty. It is foul. Blood-soaked and foul. It is art. Kennedy-killing art. And don't anyone try to tell me that it's just a different angle.

 Now, people are claiming that the reason LIFE magazine distorted what the Zapruder film showed, hiding the fatal head shot, in effect lying to the American people about what happened, was because Zapruder wanted it that way.

If it were true that Zapruder tried to tell them not to publish Z-313, and I don't believe it, they would have told him, in a gentle, kind way:

"We understand how you feel, Mr. Zapruder. But you see, we have a responsibility to tell the truth to the American people about what happened. And they are entitled to know it because all of them are affected. And sooner or later, the whole film is likely to be released, and they'll see it anyway. So because of the grave importance that this has to the history and the future of this country, we simply have to use our own judgment about it. I'm sorry to disappoint you, and I hope you understand."

And Zapruder would have nodded, and that would have been the end of it.

The claim that pleasing Zapruder was the reason LIFE magazine lied to 190 million Americans is complete bull shit.

And consider also that even if that ridiculous claim were true, couldn't they have at least described what was there?

"The film contains a frame which shows the President taking the fatal head shot, but we're not publishing it at the insistence of Mr. Zapruder. However, in it, you can see the explosive effect with a large cloud of misty red blood. It is very graphic."

Wouldn't they have at least done that? Or did Zapruder also forbid them from describing it?

I'm attaching what they published, and it is all a lie. It is all they said about the fatal head shot, which is to say: nothing.

Everything you are going to read in their statement is a lie. Jackie was aware that something was terribly wrong long before frame 262, which is what they're claiming. She started ignoring the spectators and became focused on her husband before they even reached the bogus freeway sign in the film. And when she reached over to help, what she did was try to get him to put his spastic arm down. She took his arm above and below the elbow. You can see that. And she tried to get him to relax, to put his arm down. She was coaxing it down. But, it didn't help because he was in spasm. And it wasn't from trauma; it was from the nerve agent. And as she pressed, the effect was to get him to lean a little- to tilt his whole body towards her. But, his spasms just continued and got worse.

And he may have died from it, had he not received the fatal head shot and died from that, because it's obvious that his spasticity was worsening, and it may have spread to his respiratory muscles. And if you can't breathe, you can't live.

When it says, "the President collapses on his wife's shoulder" it is referring to Z-322. So nothing was said about him having been shot at 313. If they couldn't publish it because Zapruder said no, couldn't they have at least described it? It should be obvious to you that what they did had nothing to do with Zapruder. For some reason, they did not want to disclose the fatal head shot. And it had nothing to do with Zapruder.

So, the next time someone tries to tell you that they lied in order to please Zapruder, you'll know that they are lying again.