In 3 days, it will be the 61st anniversary of JFK's murder. The most important thing to realize about it is that Oswald didn't do it, and he was standing in the doorway of the Book Depository at the time.

To the people who admit that Oswald didn't do it, but who won't admit that he was in the doorway at the time, they need to realize that there's no place else he could have been. If he wasn't on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy, then he HAD to be in the doorway.

He wasn't in the 2nd floor lunch at the time. He told the police that he ate his lunch in the 1st lunch room early in the lunch break. And they wrote it down. Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty all wrote it down. Here is Hosty's note about it. It says that he ate lunch in the 1st floor lunch room and then went outside to watch the P. Parade,. "P" was short for Presidential.

The note says that he went to the 2nd floor to get a Coke to eat with his lunch, and then he returned to the 1st floor to eat it. And then he went outside to watch. Now, Baker and Truly both said that he had no Coke when they saw him after the shooting. But, Mrs. Reid said that when she returned to her desk on the 2nd floor after the shooting that she saw Oswald with a Coke as he was passing through, presumably on his way down, the same way he came up, using the stairs in the southeast corner of the building, next to the doorway. So, if he got a Coke between when he was with Baker and Truly and when he was with Mrs. Reid, was that his second Coke? Did he have one with lunch and then get another one? I don't know. It's certainly possible.

But, it's relatively unimportant. The important thing is that he ate in the 1st floor lunch room, and then he went outside to watch the Presidential Parade.

And Oswald said that while he was eating in the 1st floor lunch room, that Jarman and Norman were hanging around. He didn't say he ate with them. He didn't eat with anybody. He was a loner at the TSBD. He just wasn't interested in making friends with anyone. He just cited that they were around at the time, and they confirmed it.

So, there is NO CHANCE that Oswald ate in the 2nd floor lunch room.

And realize also that according to Officer Marrion Baker, Oswald was just arriving at the 2nd floor lunch room when he saw him. Well, if Oswald was just getting there at 12:31.5 then it means he wasn't there at 12:30. You can't assume that he was there and came back.

And there's no place else he could have been. He wasn't working. He wasn't on the phone. He wasn't writing a love letter to Judyth Baker or to his wife Marina, whichever you prefer.

Do you want to suggest he was in the bathroom relieving himself? Well, that doesn't take that long. And they deliberately released the workers 15 minutes earlier than usual at 11:45 precisely so that they could take care of their eating and drinking and ablutions and biological functions, so that they would be ready to watch the motorcade at 12:25. That was the expected time of arrival, not 12:30. it was 5 minutes late.

And Oswald said that he was "out with Bill Shelley in front." How could he even know that Shelley was there unless he was there himself?

So, if you call yourself an Oswald defender, you have to place him in the doorway. If you don't, you're a liar. If you don't, you are NOT an Oswald defender.

 The Gorilla Man clip was reenacted long after the assassination, perhaps 2 years later. Gorilla Man was not Lovelady, and Lovelady was not there at the time. Lovelady said that he left the entrance before Baker even reached the steps. In his WC testimony, he said that he had already walked  20 to 25 steps, and then turned around, and saw Baker and Truly climbing the steps in route to their fateful encounter with Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room. So, Lovelady could not have been there 10 minutes after the shooting, when the Gorilla Man clip supposedly happened. 

 Billy Lovelady had protruding ears, which you can see in this photo by Mark Lane on the left. Of course, Oswald didn't have protruding ears, and neither did Doorman. Their ears look identical because they were the same man. But, Billy Lovelady was among the 3% who have protruding ears.

The FBI photos of Lovelady don't show it, but they were doctored. And they actually put the doctored right ear too low. I'll post it another time.

But, there is no doubt that Oswald was Doorman. Government and media have been lying about for 61 years to hide the fact that Oswald was innocent. But, he was.

The question of how Clint Hill was able to jump off the Queen Mary and then catch up to the Presidential limo has been in dispute. I maintain that the limo must have stopped or very nearly stopped. And of course, we don't see that in any film. 

The Secret Service admitted to slowing to 15 mph, but they never admitted going slower than that. But, if Clint Hill had jumped off a vehicle going 15 mph, he would have had to roll. That's because his direction in deboarding would not have been the same as the direction that his body was going from being on the moving car. So, as soon as he landed, his body would have kept going in the direction that it was going. And that would have caused him to tumble. 

And remember he was a Secret Service agent; not a circus stunt performer. 

And I'm not saying that he did tumble. Of course, he didn't. I'm saying that the cars had stopped or very nearly stopped. 

But, Stephen Smith claimed, in a comment to me, that both the Zapruder film and the Nix film show Hill jumping off the Queen Mary. 

They do not. The Zapruder film just shows him reaching the limo and climbing up it. And I should think that everyone should know that by now after all the times we've watched it. Here he is in frame 333 reaching it. By the time it gets to this, the Queen Mary is long out of view. 

We see him a couple frames before that, but that's it. We certainly don't see him jumping off the Queen Mary.

So, that statement of Stephen Smith was false. What about the Nix film? We don't see Hill jump off the Queen Mary there either. and what they did to introduce him was very tricky and sneaky. I'll go through it frame by frame.

So, that's frame 22, and I put MM to indicate Mary Moorman. Notice how non-photographic she looks. She looks like very crude art. And it gets worse from there.

So, this is frame 25, and now Mary looks practically headless. Maybe she is completely headless. Regardless, it is not a photographic image, even for the 1960s. 

In frame 27, for the first time, the head of Clint Hill peeks out. So, his head is at the same height as Mary's, but he is deep to her, and slightly in front of her. I put an arrow above the head of Clint Hill. Now, why would his head be as low as that? He was a very tall man, and she was a very short woman. Here is Clint Hill in the Willis image.

So, he was tall, and he was standing tall. So why again, would his head be at the same level as Mary Moorman's?

But continuing, he starts his trek. 

Now, he's putting some space between him and Mary, whom we can still see. But, he is still no higher than she is. And she was a very, very short woman. 

Now, in frame 37, I don't see Mary at all. I think she's gone for good. And I have circled him, as he makes his way towards the limo, apparently moving faster than the motorcycles as well.

This is frame 44, and he has reached the back of the limo.

In 52, he seems to be up on the limo. 

But then, in 58, he's back down on the ground. 

Then, jumping to 79, his right foot is still on the ground.

Finally, in 91, he's up for keeps. Notice that the limo has left the motorcycles behind. So, it sped up much more than they did. 

But, the point is that we certainly don't see Clint Hill deboarding the Queen Mary, as Stephen Smith claimed. And the weird blending of Clint Hill and Mary Moorman looks like chicanery to me. And if you watch it all at speed, then it really looks like the two of them are one, and he just grew out of her. To capture these frames, I had to slow the film down to 25% speed. It's a good thing we can do that on Youtube. 

But, watch it yourself, and be sure to watch the part on Houston Street first because the film looks photographic there. It's not until it gets to the Kill Zone that it looks like crappy art. There is a big qualitative difference between the two. And it was the same camera and the same film! There is no excuse for it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toU8GSRnOQk

I tell you that at the speed that the limo appears to be going, there is no way that Clint Hill could have caught up with it. Maybe Usain Bolt in his prime could have caught up with it, but I doubt that Clint Hill could have. 

And at that speed, there is no way he could have deboarded the Queen Mary, and just instantly started running. I think it's very unlikely he could have even stayed on his feet. As soon as he planted his foot on the ground, his forward momentum would have caused him to fall.  He had no break. I and the Laws of Physics say he would have rolled. 

 

 On the right is Lovelady posing for Robert Groden in 1976- as if he wore that flashy plaid shirt on 11/22/63. But, Lovelady lost a lot of weight after the assassination. He looks slender in this picture. The FBI weighed and measured him on February 29, 1964 and found him to be 5'8" 170 pounds, and I suspect he weighed more than that on 11/22; from losing weight from all the stress he was under. But regardless, he could not have been more than 150 in 1976, and maybe even just 145.

Yet, that plaid shirt fit him snugly. It looks tight on him. So, how could it have git him at all in 1963 when he was much bigger and heavier?

And look how pressed it is. Somebody took an iron to that shirt to press the collar down and create the neat spread that it has. It took a lot to create that effect. But, on the morning of 11/22/63, when he was going to his job at the warehouse, knowing that he was going to be laying flooring all morning, would he have pressed his shirt like that?

Notice on Doorman and Oswald, the margin of the t-shirt looks sunken, like a vee. But, Lovelady's t-shirt looks perfectly high and round. Oswald had the habit of stretching his t-shirts, deforming the collar of it. And that's what we're seeing on him and on Doorman. It's obviously his deformed t-shirt on Doorman.

Finally, Oswald's outer shirt had lost its buttons, except for the bottom two, and that's why it was unbuttoned. And the same goes for Doorman, who was Oswald. But, look at those big over-size buttons on Lovelady's shirt. And look at the whole starched, groomed look of the shirt, like a wardrobe person prepped it before the camera rolled. It is obviously not the natural, normal arrangement of the shirt. And again, he was going to his warehouse job to lay flooring. THERE IS NO WAY HE PRIMPED LIKE THAT. But, they did that to sell the idea that he was Doorman. So, like me, you should reject this bloodied choreography. Billy Lovelady was not the Doorway Man, but he was standing next to him as the man who was visoring his eyes.

 On the left, Billy Lovelady was posing as Doorman, but he got it wrong. He was clasping his hands behind his back, while Oswald had the habit of clasping his hands in front of his body. He was doing it in the doorway and also at the DPD after his arrest.

So, look at Oswald on the right. You see him doing it. And now look at Doorman because he's doing it too.

Now, the photo-alterers realized that that stance was going to identify him as Oswald. So, they stuck the head of the black man in there. That's the face of Carl Jones who worked at the TSBD. And he was there, but he was out of view to Altgens. The parallax effect cut him off. It was an angular shot.

So, that photo of Carl was taken by Congressman Phil Willis, and they got his camera too. So, they put that face in there. At the time of the Altgens photo, Carl was looking the other way, down Elm, because that's where the President and First Lady were. Why would he be facing east? There was nothing to see in that direction.

And look below Carl's face. You see Oswald's cuff. And beneath his cuff, you see this white shamrock. That's what I call it. What the hell is that? Well, that's supposed to be his body. How could that pass for his body? It could pass because the whole image was so small. They didn't know at the time that home computing was coming and so was the internet. So, they didn't know that people were going to have the means to blow these images up and have them at their disposal. The computer revolution has been the undoing of JFK's killers.

But, they did something else. They tried to make it that Oswald's arm coming down was Carl's arm going up. They tried to make it that Carl was waving at somebody. So, that's supposed to be his arm and his hand. But wait. There's no difference in greyscale between his shirt and his skin. Carl wore a light pastel long-sleeved shirt. We can see it in the Wiegman film. In the Willis slide, it looks rather pink, actually. But, how could that apply to what we're seeing in Altgens? And the fact is, that if that's supposed to be his arm going up waving at someone (which is ridiculous, considering what was going on) his arm is too vertical. When people raise their arm to wave, they don't raise it that high. Little kids might because they are extremely flexible; but not adults. So, that can't be his arm.

All of this was done just to obscure the fact that Oswald was standing there clasping his hands in front.

We're 6 days away from the 61st anniversary. And RFK Jr. has the ear of the incoming President. And I have a feeling that Elon Musk would also like JFK truth to come out. So, brace yourself for change because it's coming.

Lovelady NEVER said that he was Doorman. Right away, the FBI said he said he was Doorman. But, there’s a big difference between that and putting him in front of a sea of microphones to say it. Why did the FBI have to speak for him? Wasn’t this important enough for him to speak for himself?

Then, in February, the FBI photographed him wearing the striped short-sleeved shirt with the button undone. The reason he unbuttoned his shirt is because Doorman's shirt was unbuttoned, and he recreating Doorman.

You need to understand that they were trying to recreate Doorman in the Altgens photo, and it would have been pointless unless he was wearing Doorman's clothes.  And those were the clothes he told them he wore on 11/22.

But, what about the disconnect between Lovelady’s clothes and Doorman’s? Lovelady surely was aware of it, but he was just following orders. The two FBI agents who were in charge, and they just overlooked it. It just sailed right over their heads. Maybe they had something else on their mind. They surely weren't thinking.

Then came Lovelady's Warren Commission testimony. Wasn’t that the time for him to come clean and say that he was Doorman? But, he didn't, and Joseph Ball NEVER asked him directly. He never pointed to Doorman and asked, "Who is this?"

But, Ball did that with Frazier. He pointed to Doorman and asked, "Who is this?.  Here is the testimony.

Mr. BALL - We have got a picture taken the day of the parade and it shows the President's car going by. Now, take a look at that picture. Can you see your picture any place there?

Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; I don't, because I was back up in this more or less black area here. Mr. BALL - I see.

Mr. FRAZIER - Because Billy, like I say, is two or three steps down in front of me.

Mr. BALL - Do you recognize this fellow?

Mr. FRAZIER - That is Billy, that is Billy Lovelady.

Mr. BALL - Billy?

Mr. FRAZIER – Right.

Mr. BALL - Let's take a marker and make an arrow down that way. That mark is Billy Lovelady? Mr. FRAZIER - Right.

There, Frazier said he was "back up in the black area." Then shortly afterwards, he said he was "one step down from the top of the steps." But, that's just one contradiction. First, he said that Billy was two or three steps down in front of himself. That means Billy could not have been Doorman because Doorman was standing on the top level.

Ball must have pointed to Doorman when he asked, "Do you recognize this fellow?" So, when Frazier said he was Lovelady, why didn't Ball come back with, "But, I thought you said Billy was 2 or 3 steps down on in front of you?"

But, Ball didn't reply that way. He was just trying to get what he needed from Frazier and probably realized he was, mentally, a basket case.

And why was Frazier in such bad condition mentally? I have to wonder if they were drugging him.

But, this certainly establishes that Ball asked Frazier directly who Doorman was. It's what he wanted to know, so he asked.

But, why didn't Ball do the same with Lovelady? He didn't.

Mr. BALL - I have got a picture here, Commission Exhibit 369. Are you on that picture?

Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir.

Mr. BALL - Take a pen or pencil and mark an arrow where you are.

Mr. LOVELADY - Where I thought the shots are?

Mr. BALL - No; you in the picture.

Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, here (indicating).

Mr. BALL - Draw an arrow down to that; do it in the dark. You got an arrow in the dark and one in the white pointing toward you. Where were you when the picture was taken?

Mr. LOVELADY - Right there at the entrance of the building standing on the step, would be here (indicating).

Mr. BALL - You were standing on which step?

Mr. LOVELADY - It would be your top level.

Mr. BALL - The top step you were standing there? Mr. LOVELADY - Right.

So, why didn't Ball do the same with Lovelady as he did with Frazier? Why didn't he point to Doorman and ask, "Who is this?" Or, he could have asked, "Is this you?" Or, he could have said, "Point to yourself in the photo." Any of those would have worked. But, Ball instead went the non-verbal route, asking Lovelady to draw an arrow to himself, WITHOUT SAYING IT.

Why not say it first, and then draw the arrow? Why skip verbal communication and go right to arrow-drawing?

IT'S BECAUSE BALL DIDN'T KNOW WHAT LOVELADY WAS GOING TO SAY. Apparently, he had been warned that Lovelady was balking about being Doorman. So, having him draw an arrow instead was a safety precaution.

And note that Ball told Lovelady to draw his arrow IN THE DARK.  Realize that "dark" was another word for "black" and the writing instrument was also black. So, it was black on black, which would have been barely visible at all.  Why did Ball do that? It's because he was scared of what Lovelady might do.

And, the fact is that Lovelady drew his arrow to Black Hole Man, the man who was visoring his eyes with his hands, though his head is missing. But fortunately, his arrow registered a little on the arm of Black Hole Man, so we can see it.  I’m attaching it.

So, the big arrow in this photo is Frazier's arrow, and that tiny little black mark on the forearm of Black Hole Man is the tail of Lovelady's arrow.

Fast forward to 1967 and the CBS JFK Special., They paid for Lovelady to return to Dallas from Colorado where he had moved with his family. Even though Lovelady had worked for $1.11/hr at the TSBD, and couldn't pay a $75 fine he owed in Maryland in January 1963, Lovelady had the money to start his own freight hauling company in Colorado. CBS had planned a big segment on Doorman, including an extensive interview of Lovelady. They did the interview. But, because of how it came out, they not only trashed the interview; they trashed the whole segment. Not a word was said about Doorman. It was all buried.

Fast forward to 1976 and the HSCA. The HSCA didn't want to talk to Lovelady either. The word was out about him. Instead they sent their lawyer Ken Brooten along with Robert Grodin to go talk to him in Colorado. Lovelady must have begged Brooten not to force him to go to Washington. Keep in mind that Brooten subpoenaed a great many people. But, in Lovelady's case, he not only didn't subpoena him, he quit his job as HSCA lawyer to become Lovelady's lawyer.

But, why did Lovelady need a lawyer? He wasn't under indictment for anything. He wasn't being accused of a crime. He wasn't being threatened with arrest. So, why did he need a lawyer? And why would Brooten quit his job to be his lawyer? Have you ever heard of anything so weird? For a government lawyer to quit his job to become the lawyer of a witness in the investigation he formerly was running?

But, that kept Lovelady from having to go to Washington to say that he was Doorman. And then, when the HSCA Final Report came out in January 1979, Lovelady conveniently died a few days before of a fatal first heart attack at the age of 41.

So, how many times, in total, did Lovelady say that he was Doorman? I don't mean someone else saying that he said it. That's what you call hearsay, and it's not even allowed in court. I mean where we can see and hear Lovelady saying that he was Doorman.

The answer is zero. It never happened. And the fact is that Lovelady spent the rest of his life running away from his Doorman nightmare.  

He died rich. His wife Patricia inherited not only the trucking business, but vast real estate holdings throughout Colorado. Yeah, he went far for a guy who was making $1.11 an hour at the TSBD,.  But, what a miserable life.  Even if he had as much money as Elon Musk, I'd still pity him. Lovelady did not want to lie about being Doorman, and it surely anguished him every day for the rest of his life.

Billy Nolan Lovelady was NOT Doorman. Lee Harvey Oswald was, and he told the police that he was  “out with Bill Shelley in front.” He could only have known that if he had been there himself, in the doorway.