This is Bagman and the Penguins getting Bookhout's head covered, since he wasn't Jack Ruby. 

 The history of the JFk assassination, and I mean the whole saga, is mostly a history of lying. The crime itself happened fast. The planning of it probably started right after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Allen Dulles really thought he could force JFK to provide air support to take Castro out. When JFK didn't and then offered to compensate Castro to the tune of $50 million, though in baby food and baby supplies, that was the last straw.

But, we're basically talking about a year and half from starting until the weekend of the assassination. But, it was followed by over 60 years of lying and obfuscating and altering films and photos, and conducting rigged investigations. You know there were three: the Warren Commission, the HSCA, and the ARRB, and they were all corrupt. They were all designed to do one thing: protect the government, which is to say: protect the killers.

And who were the killers? They were Allen Dulles, Lyndon Johnson, and J. Edgar Hoover. But not everyone who worked for them was aware of what was happening.

I don't think Ruth Paine was in on it, but I think her estranged husband, Michael Paine was. How many estranged husbands are willing to let their separated wife, whom he is still supporting, lock, stock, and barrel, move a pregnant woman and her daughter in for him to feed? That goes way beyond plausibility. He worked at Bell Helicopter, right under the former Nazi, Walter Dornberger, who developed the V2 rocket for Hitler. And Bell Helicopter soared from the Vietnam War. I think the stock went up ten-fold. Ruth Paine was, and always has been, supportive of the official story, but they certainly didn't tell her anything. She was a pacifiist, and they knew it. They had no reason to tell her. They could get what they needed from her without telling her.

And you know that Michael Paine's mother, Ruth Forbes Young was best friends with Mary Bancroft, who was Allen Dulles' longterm mistress. It's interesting that even AI confirms that they were best friends.

There were other people who had big roles but who just weren't on it, for instance, Officer Marrion Baker. He was a lowly motorcycle cop, and nobody tapped him on the shoulder and told them they were killing Kennedy. And he unwittingly exonerated Oswald because it's clear from what he said that Oswald did not come down from the 6th floor; rather, he came up from the 1st floor and entered the vestibule of the lunch room from the office side.

Officer Roy Vaughn certainly wasn't in on it. He was the third victim on Sunday. He was placed to guard the Main Street ramp AFTER the real Ruby was seized and then held on the 5th floor during the spectacle, only to be slipped into the story later, and he was completely bamboozled. But, Officer Roy Vaughn wasn't bamboozled. When he received a reprimand for letting Ruby slip past him, he sued the DPD. It's because he knew damn well that Ruby never got past him. It did not go to trial, and I'm not the least bit surprised. The DPD settled with Vaughn. We don't know the amount of money they gave him, but it was probably substantial. They picked the wrong guy to put there. They didn't know what a fighter he was.

Most of the reporters in the garage were not in on the Oswald shooting. The way I know that is none of them recognized the shooter as Ruby, even those who knew Ruby, such as Hugh Aynesworth and Ike Pappas. And the fact is that the Shooter wasn't Ruby. But, if the reporters were in on it, they would have said they recognized him as Ruby, just as the Dallas Police did. Fritz and his detectives certainly were in on it.

And I tell you in all seriousness and certainty that the Dallas Police killed Oswald. One of them had to pull the trigger in the Jail Office, and I think it was Tippit's partner Officer RC Nelson. I will write a post about that.

Hugh Aynesworth ate lunch with Ruby that week, yet, he said he did not recognize the Shooter as him. He said the Shooter zipped right in front of him, but he never had the slightest inkling that the guy was Ruby.

But, an eerie thing happened over the years. Some of the reporters started talking about the incident, as though they did recognize Ruby at the time. They started saying things, such as, "and then I saw Ruby rush in and shot Oswald." That sounds like they recognized Ruby, but they didn't. And I don't say it was a conscious deception. It was more of a subconscious deception.

And what drove it all was the need for political correctness. It's not like everyone wants to go down the path that I'm on. Most people want to fit in. And they were still reporters; it was their livelihood. If they had challenged the official story, they would have lost their jobs. Consider that Comedian Mort Sahl was blacklisted for 20 years for challenging the official story of the JFK assassination. And he was one of the greatest standup comics of all time. And he was officially JFK's joke-writer. They were good personal friends.

What a dark story this is because we know the killed went on for years. The year 1964 was full of death for JFK witnesses. It continued, but the next big flurry of death occurred during the HSCA. Two notable names from that period are David Sanchez Morales (who has a loose mouth when he drank) and George DeMohrenschildt.

But, the official story of the JFK assassination is a dead duck, and it is going to drop from its own dead weight.

 "All you need know to understand that the Warren commission report is BS is the magic bullet theory. There is a great deal more but the magic bullet theory is something only a retarded monkey could believe." Scott Hanson

Scott is absolutely right, and I am absolutely disgusted with the American medical profession for not crying foul about this. Supposedly, JFK had a big, fat FMJ bullet burrow through his neck from back to front, traversing him, literally turning him into a doughnut. and yet afterwards, he was still sitting there, with all his muscles still working.

I've done quite a lot of searching on PubMed, and I can tell you that there has never been another case like this. But, the magnitude severeity of the trauma would be so great that sitting upright would be impossible. And let's remember that until Arlen Spectre announced the Single Bullet Theory in April 1964, nobody had suspected such a thing. And let's remember also that the autopsy doctors had the opportunity to dissect JFK's neck and find out, definitively if it was traversed by a bullet. They didn't do it, and there are rumors that the Admirals in the room wouldn't let them.

But, when you are a doctor, you are supposed to have integrity, and that's true even if you are an autopsist. If it really is true that the Admirals wouldn't let Humes dissect Kennedy to find out if the back wound and throat wound were connected, he should have said, "Then, that means war. It means that I am going to tour the country declaring that you are obstructing justice. Now, as a forensic pathologist and autopsist, I need to open the President's neck. I am not asking you. I am telling you that you need to get out of my way and let me do my job."

But, Dr. Humes was not that kind of man and not that kind of doctor.

And the medical profession failed in other ways. Once the Zapruder was shown to the public, doctors should have realized how impaired Kennedy was- not just physically, but mentally. The visual and testimonial record established that JFK never spoke once the shooting began; that he never took any evasive or defensive action; that he never took any action to protect his wife, that he never responded to her or anyone else, verbally or non-verbally, and he never showed any consccious awareness of what was going on.

Everything about JFK's presentation in the Zapruder film is bizarre. It is freaky. And as soon as doctors saw that, they should have sought to explain it, clinically explain it, and not just glibly says, "Oh well, he was shot."

I found an article on what happens when you get shot in the neck, and it states that "In one study of 40 patients with cervical gunshot injuries, 70% arrived with complete neurological deficits, meaning total loss of motor and sensory function below the injury."

JFK had a heap of problems, but he did not have any neurological deficits, that we know of. All the connections between his nerves and muscles were intract. He wasn't paralyzed anywhere, as he sat there. And he certainly would have been, had he experienced the the trauma that was claimed.

The truth is that prior to the fatal head shot, JFK had a shallow wound in his back that did no vital damage at all, and he had a shallow wound in his throat that damaged his trachea on the left side, and it left a mild contusion (bruise) on the apex of his right lung. That was it until the fatal head shot effectively killed him the instant it hit him.

Here is the article about the severity and the special dangers of gunshot wounds of the neck, let alone a traversing wound going from back to front.

https://biologyinsights.com/what-happens-when-you-get-shot-in-the-neck/

We have been lied to for 63 years. Let's not take it any more.

 Two words that are gong to change everything. Thank you, Kevin.

 Here is that damning photo of the three Dallas detectives huddled with "Ruby" except the man is clearly not Ruby. I have installed an image of Ruby next to him. They are different men, and it isn't close. The Shooter has a very round face; Ruby, on the right, has a longer face. The Shooter had a short forehead. Ruby had a much longer forehead. Ruby had a much longer neck. The Shooter had a narrower nose.

And keep in mind that both images were doctored. For instance, Ruby did not have as much hair as that. He was practically bald on top. And the Shooter lost his eyes; they were replaced with stripes.

So, how did I get this image? It came from the 1993 30 year retrospective about the Oswald shooting by NBC. It was televised that year, and it used to be streaming on Youtube, which is where I saw it. But, once I started bellyaching about it, it was taken down, and it has never been put back up.

Notice that they blurred Sims in back. He's like a ghost; isn't he? And that is photographically impossible. Why should he be blurred? He wasn't moving. So, he can't have motion blur. And if he was blurred because of something going on with the camera, like being out of focus, then they all would have been blurred.

Detective Elmer Boyd on the left lied. He said that he spent Sunday morning going to church with his wife and his in-laws. Then, they went to his in-laws' house to enjoy a nice Sunday brunch. And of course, they had the tv on while they were eating, and of course it was on NBC (even though at that time, CBS was, by far, the most popular station for News because of Walter Cronkite) and they saw the Garage Shooting. He said that even though it was his day off, he thought he'd better go in, in case he was needed. So, he apologized to his wife and her parents, and he left.

But, that story can't possibly be true because this photo was taken just a couple minutes after the shooting, and he could not have gotten there in two minutes. So, he was there already. The whole story he told was a crock of lies.

So, they were on the 3rd floor, which had been evacuated, and they were huddled there in the dark, and that light came entirely from the flash of the NBC cameraman's camera.

There are some other oddities about this. You notice that the Shooter is out of his jacket. According to the detectives who took Ruby up to the 5th floor, he wasn't taken out of his jacket until they got up there. Of course, they said nothing about stopping on the 3rd floor. I'm talking about Detectives, McMillan, Archer, and Clardy, and also Blackie Harrison. Those guys handled the real Jack Ruby, and it was an hour before the Garage Spectacle.

That man in the center, the Garage Shooter, was FBI Agent James W. Bookhout. He was short. We know he was short. FBI Agent James Hosty said that on Friday, Bookhout was looking for him in the hall on the 3rd floor, when it was crowded with reporters, so he found something he could stand on to see above the crowd. Would a tall man have needed to do that?

But, the other thing I want you to notice is that these detectives aren't concerned about "Ruby" at all. None of them have their eyes on him. And supposedly, there was a big scuffle in the basement, right? So, why aren't they afraid that he is going to bolt or kick somebody? It's because they knew who he was, and they were all working together.

It was established in the testimonies that Ruby was handcuffed with his hands behind his back. We don't know that the Shooter is handcuffed at all. He may just be clasping his hands in front of his body, and that's what it looks like he's doing.

What happened after this is that they took Bookhout back to wherever his clothes were, and he quickly got out of Ruby's clothes and put on his own. Then, he went down to the Jail Office and got there before the ambulance attendants arrived and put Oswald on the stretcher and rolled him out to the garage to load into the ambulance. Bookhout was there for that. He told the WC that he followed Oswald's stretcher out to the garage. I looked for a photo of him there doing that, and I found one, which I'll show you next time.

 So, Oswald was denied a lawyer, even though he wanted one badly, while Ruby, who never asked for a lawyer, was brought one anyway.

What bugs me the most about it is the hypocrisy. Fritz spoke to reporters after he got back from Parkland Hospital where Oswald died, and he said that Ruby was talking with his lawyer, "which is his right." His right? What about Oswald's rights?

So, why did they staunchly deny Oswald a lawyer but foist one on Ruby? Well, they couldn't give Oswald a lawyer because if they did, the things that Oswald told the lawyer, he or she could have made public. since there was no gag order. And it would have been very damning, especially to the FBI. Oswald did NOT mail-order a rifle, and it would have been very easy to prove that. And if he didn't, it meant that the FBI concocted the whole story. How damning is that? It's as damning as damning gets.

And if Oswald owned no rifle, it meant that the photos of him holding one were bogus too. And there was much, much more.

It was planned weil in advance to kill Oswald very soon; meaning that weekend. The fact is that they hoped to get him killed in the theater on Friday afternoon. They did not want to kill him at the TSBD because he wasn't armed, and it would have looked bad. So, the plan was to get him armed with a pitol first and then kill him. They did get him armed, but the killing in the theater didn't work out. You know what they say about the best-laid plans of mice and men.

But Ruby, they wanted him to get a lawyer; one of their choosing; one who would reinforce his guilt. We know that Tom Howard only talked to Ruby for 4 minutes that Sunday. How could he possibly find out all he needed to know in 4 minutes? Consider all the questions he needed to ask him. Did you go to the garage to shoot Oswald? And if you didn't, what did you go there for? Did you spend the whole weekend planning to kill Oswald? If you heard that the Jail Transfer was going to be at 10 AM, why did you wait until well after 11 to go there? Why did you even expect him to be there? How exactly did it happen? Were you feeling rage at the time? What did you think would happen after you shot Oswald in a crowd of Police? Did you realize that you were destroying your whole life? What did you do afterwards? Were you going to shoot Oswald again? Were you going to shoot anyone else? What did you do when the Police grabbed you? Did you resist? Did you fight back? If you didn't plan to shoot Oswald, what made you do it? Was it just the sight of him? You sent a $25 money wire to an employee right before shooting Oswald, but it seems like an odd combination of things to do because once you shot Oswald, there was no more business for you., and you had to know that. So, why did you do it?

I could go go on and on, but it's obvious that Howard didn't ask Oswald any of those questions. I'm sure Howard started with the presumption that Ruby did it. He must have spent the 4 minutes telling Ruby that he was going to file the writ of habeus corpus, which meant that the State needed to formally charge Ruby or else release him on bond. But, look how close the times were. Agent Hall said that Howard talked to Ruby from 12:58 to 1:02. He then went to court to file the writ. But, at 1:15, it was announced that Oswald had died, and Ruby was then formally charged with murder. Howard had to know how likely and how imminent that was. There really was no point in filing the writ. I think he did it just to establish himself as Ruby's lawyer. He did it for himself, not Ruby. Did he really think there was any chance that Ruby was going to be released on bond? He was an idiot lawyer if he thought that.

The Dallas Police wanted Ruby to have a lawyer because they knew how submissive and cooperative Ruby was; that he was not going to challenge what they said he did. And it made them look good getting him a lawyer right away.

But, I tell you that the Dallas Police framed the hapless, helpless Ruby, and they, the Dallas Police, killed Oswald. Does that sound wild and extreme to you? I'm sorry if it does, but it is the truth. And they did not shoot him in the garage. They shot him in the Jail Office afterwards.

And I am sure that they were confident that nobody's mind was going to go there: to the Dallas Police killing Oswald. And it was because everyone had the belief and conviction that such a thing couldn't happen in America. But, it did happen in America. And after 63 years, we need to face it.

 If you have doubted me about Jack Ruby being innocent, I have something surprising to tell you that may change your mind.

First, you know that Oswald pleaded for a lawyer, but the Dallas Police wouldn’t give him one. He devoted his whole MPC speech to protest that and to implore the world for “legal assistance.” He did so much damage that night, that they had to do “damage control” the next evening by having Attorney H Louis Nichols meet with an Oswald double who turned down his offer of a lawyer.

I assure that that was not Oswald in the cell. You know that in the wee hours of Saturday morning he pleaded with the whole world for a lawyer. You think he changed his mind 16 hours later? No way.

But, it was very different for Ruby.  It was the opposite for him.  Supposedly, he shot Oswald at 11:21, and before 1:00, he had a lawyer without even asking for one. Llet’s talk about that lawyer.

His name was Tom Howard, and he was NOT Ruby’s lawyer, and he never was. He had never ever  done any kind of legal work for Ruby. Not criminal, and not civil. We have been lied to about that since 1963. And there is evidence that Howard and Ruby didn’t now each other at all.  

Over the years, a story arose that Ruby’s family called Howard. That’s a lie. Another story emerged that George Senator drove him to visit Ruby- another lie. There is no solid evidence that Ruby knew Howard at all.   

The way that Tom Howard became Ruby’s lawyer was rigged by him and the Dallas Police.  First, he was let into the Police Department, even though it was on lockdown after the shooting. Fritz and most of his men were at Parkland Hospital waiting for Oswald to die.  Howard was let in, and somebody in the police department took him up to Ruby’s cell.

All Ruby was told was that a lawyer was here to see him. Read this testimony by FBI Agent Hall.

Here is the relevant portion of FBI Special Agent C. Ray Hall's sworn testimony, taken May 28, 1964, concerning Tom Howard and Jack Ruby.

Warren Commission Hearings, Volume XV, pages 64–65.

How did Tom Howard get involved?

Mr. Hubert: How did Mr. Howard get into the matter; do you know?

Mr. Hall: I was interviewing Jack Ruby when one of the jailers, a uniformed officer that I did not know, came in and said that an attorney was downstairs and wanted to talk with Jack Ruby. I told him that Jack was available immediately to go talk with his attorney.

Jack was wearing only a pair of shorts. (RC: he meant boxer shorts So, Ruby was left in his underwear, and that is a documented fact.)  The officers bought him his clothing: shirt, trousers,  shoes, and then after dressing, Ruby went downstairs to talk to Mr. Howard.

Mr. Hubert: You went with him too?

Mr. Hall: Yes, sir; I went with him too. Ruby did not know who the attorney was.

Did Ruby recognize Howard?

Mr. Hubert: Did he recognize him when he saw him? I mean, did he say anything or do anything to indicate he did?

Mr. Hall: Not relly—Ruby walked over to a door where there was a screen where people can confer with prisoners and I was at the back of the room and I did not hear any of the conversation.

Mr. Hubert: Through the usual accommodations for attorneys-clients?

Mr. Hall: Yes, sir.

Mr. Hubert: They are separated by a screen?

Mr. Hall: Yes, sir; and I stayed with the other officers and we were back. I knew who Howard was, but whether Jack Ruby did or not, I couldn’t say.

How long did the meeting last?

Mr. Hubert: And that was, as I understand it, between 1:58 and 2:02?

Mr. Hall: Yes.

Mr. Hubert: So, about 4 minutes?

Mr. Hall: Just 4 minutes.

RC: Let me explain something. Ruby got to the basement an hour early, and he was jumped upon and taken up to the jail. For several hours, he was kept under wraps. He wasn’t really slipped into the story until 3:00. Fritz had gotten back after Oswald died, and it was time for Ruby’s first interrogation with him. So, they brought him down to the 3^rd floor, which was packed with reporters and cameramen, and that’s when he got slipped into the story for the very first time.

Ruby was not in the garage during the spectacle. FBI Agent James Bookhout masqueraded as Ruby. But, he was quite a bit shorter than Ruby, and he was pudgier than Ruby.  And being an FBI agent, Bookhout had razored hair in back. Ruby didn’t have razored hair in back. So, Bookhout wore a mop of a wig. And that is who we are seeing in the films and photos; not Ruby.

So, why did they want Ruby to have a lawyer but not Oswald? They wanted Ruby to have a lawyer because the lawyer that they picked, Tom Howard, would reinforce to Ruby that he did it, that he shot Oswald. Everyone was reinforcing that in Ruby.

And Ruby went along with everything. He was the most submissive person there ever was. His submission to Authority, in this case the Dallas Police, the FBI, and the Secret Service, was absolute. I’ll give you an example. Dr. Fred Bieberdorf, the Jail doctor who was still a student, he went to Ruby and told him that he had to perform a rectal exam on him because the Police were concerned that he might be hiding a firearm in his rectum. I’m not making it up. So, Ruby let him perform a rectal exam. There was nothing that Ruby protested. He was so passive and submissive, it makes you wonder what the melee was about. Well, I know what it was about. It was about keeping James Bookhout covered up until they could get him inside, so that people and television viewers wouldn’t see that he wasn’t Jack Ruby.

Ruby never, ever requested a lawyer, but they brought him one. Oswald howled for a lawyer, but they wouldn’t let him have one. The difference was that Oswald was of right mind and Ruby was not. If Oswald had talked to a lawyer, they would have had to kill the lawyer.

So, am I saying that James Bookhout shot Oswald in the garage? No. Absolutely not. That would have been dangerous. Someone else could have been hurt. That was all theater. Oswald was shot in the Jail Office afterwards. By whom? By the Dallas Police. They killed Oswald and framed Ruby. That is the disgusting truth about what happened on 11/24/63.

 Read this exchange I had with AI:

RC:  You say Howard “bypassed security.” Explain that.

When historians say Tom Howard "bypassed security," they are referring to how he utilized his extreme familiarity with the building and personal rapport with the officers to casually walk into a highly restricted crime scene.

Howard did not sneak past guards or break through barricades. Instead, the "bypass" occurred because the Dallas Police Department’s strict lockdown procedures entirely dissolved for individuals who were considered trusted insiders.

Official FBI interviews and Warren Commission documents detail how the bypass occurred: [1, 2]

• He Was Already Inside the Basement: Howard's law office was directly across the street from City Hall. On the morning of November 24, he walked over and entered the building through the Harwood Street basement entrance. [1]
• The "Insider Pass": A detective was stationed at that door specifically to block unauthorized personnel. However, Howard was a prominent, fixture-like defense attorney in the Dallas legal system who drank, networked, and worked daily with local cops and detectives. Because the guard recognized him as a trusted insider, Howard was simply waved through into the basement garage without a press pass or security clearance. [1]
• Witnessing the Shooting: Howard walked over to the jail office windows, looked inside to see what was happening, and asked a detective if they were getting ready to move Oswald. Within seconds, Lee Harvey Oswald was led out, and Jack Ruby stepped from the crowd and fired the fatal shot right in front of Howard. [1, 2]
• Walking Into the Booking Area: Immediately after the gunshot, absolute bedlam erupted. While the basement was instantly locked down to the public, Howard used the chaos and his recognizable face to walk directly into the jail booking area where officers had tackled and dragged Ruby. [1]

 

Because the Dallas police were treating the most high-stakes transfer in American history with an "old boys' club" mentality regarding building access, Howard was able to bypass standard security protocols simply by being a familiar face in the crowd.

 

Jack Ruby was innocent. He did not shoot Oswald. But, he was so impaired mentally, and also drugged, that he was tricked into believing that he did. And the whole country was tricked into believing that he did with that dog and pony show they put on.