So, as his Secret Service agents had the door open on Elm Street, at the same time LBJ was scooting down his seat in the Veep car ahead of them. What I mean by that is that he scooted his butt forward in the seat and probably had his knees pressed against the seatback in front in order to get his head down. It shows in the Altgens photo.

I have what is probably the best version of the Altgens photo. I got it from Dr. Gerald McKnight. I was privileged to be able to connect with him near the end of his life. I never met him in person, but I had 5 or 6 long phone calls with him. He was bedridden at the time and within months of the end, but his mind was still sharp.

Notice that Lady Bird and Senator Yarborough look quite good, meaning high resolution. So, why don't we see LBJ? It's not because he was scooted down so low that he disappeared. I think that when the CIA photo-alterers saw it, they saw him scooted down, and they realized that that looked bad; real bad. So, they took him out.

The arrow that I put there is actually pointing to his Secret Service Agent Rufus Youngblood, who was Native American. LBJ actually had the nerve to claim that Rufus turned around, grabbed him, and threw him down to the floor of the car. Then, he climbed over the seatback and lied on top of him. Do you believe that? If you do, stop it because Senator Yarborough said it never happened. And the Laws of Physics say it never happened. That's beause the floor of the car was occupied by the legs and feet of Lady Bird and Senator Yarborough. So, how oculd even one man lie on the floor, let alone two?

And observe the expressions on the faces of Lady Bird and Senator Yarborough. They are not looking distressed. They both seem festive. And that is clear evidence that what I have told you about the Altgens photo is true, that the imagery of JFK and Jackie in it is bogus. The throat shot didn't happen yet. That happened later and lower on the hill. The Altgens photo was taken high on the hill right when JFK was shot in the back. But, that was practically silent, and it may have been completely silent to the occupants of the VEEP car. Those two don't look like they are aware of anything dire. Don't you agree? They look like happy campers to me. And that should tell you that this photo was taken early- long before JFK was shot in the throat.

LBJ actually gave an award to Youngblood for saving his life. They had a big ceremony for it at the White House, and Youngblood brought his wife and many kids. But, I bet he hated every second of it because he knew the truth, that it never happened.

Did you know that Ruby was put into Oswald's cell on 11/24? We have this statement from the Jailer Henry Ellison: 

“Oswald was in cell F-2 Friday, November 22nd, Saturday, November 23rd, and Sunday, November 24th, 1963, and after Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby,  Ruby was then placed in that same cell F-2 on Sunday, November 24, 1963.”

But, whether it was the same cell as Oswald or another one really doesn't matter because they were all the same. I have a picture of Oswald's cell. 

So, it had a sink and a commode but no mirror. And they all looked like that. Therefore, how did Ruby go from looking like he does on the left to looking like he does on the right?

 David Tarshis

 ·

Then why did Dorothy Kilgallen get murdered? She had an interview with Ruby, and she bragged about it. Big mistake. She was on What's My Line, and she was a journalist.

Reply

Share

Ralph Cinque

 ·

David Tarshis Dorothy Kilgallen had two private meetings with Ruby during recesses at the trial. The fact that there were two tells you that they must have gotten along. Nobody knows what was said. But, I tell you that she was definitely murdered, and it was because of those meetings. So, what did she glean from those meetings with Ruby? Being a smart woman, I think she gleaned several things; that he was not right in the head; that he had not the slightest bit of viciousness in him and did not seem capable of murder; and he may have said something that made her realize, or at least suspect, that he was innocent. And those who put the Dallas Police up to killing Oswald and framing Ruby for it (starting with LBJ) couldn't take the chance about what she learned and what she concluded. So, they killed her.

 This is a gif of the beginning of the NBC footage of the Oswald shooting in which Fritz, who was leading, turned around and nodded at the trio. He must have been signalling to them that he spotted James Bookhout, so it was go-time. 

 On the left, it's supposed to be Ruby when they were taking him up to the 5th floor jail for the first time after the Oswald shooting. On the right, it's him when they took him down to the 3rd floor for the first time to prance him in front of reporters.

What the mother-folk? Did they give him a makeover? There is nothing in the record about him getting a makeover. There's no book that says he got one. And let's face it: prisoners in jail don't get makeovers.

So, what should we make of this? It's just more vile evil from the JFK assassination, in which our government killed Kennedy, Tippit and then Oswald, and then framed poor, hapless, hopeless Jack Ruby.

 Now, we need to talk about Officer RC Nelson, Tippit's partner. They didn't ride together. They each had separate patrol cars. But, they worked the same area of Dallas, Oak Cliff.

Nelson was silent for 50 years. He made no public statements until 2013, the time of the 50th anniversary. And he said something startling: he said he was there in the basement on November 24, and that he was the one who handcuffed Ruby. What he said doesn't make sense. How could Ruby not have a gun?

“I grabbed for his hands and didn't find a gun, and then I managed to manhandle him into the basement jail house office and handcuffed him.”

Nelson isn't even in the films we have of the detectives pouncing on "Ruby" after the shot. The only uniformed officer we see, involved in that, was Sergeant Patrick Dean. And the WC testimonies make clear that it was Detective Thomas McMillan who handcuffed "Ruby." We don't see McMillan doing it because it reportedly happened in the Jail Office off-camera.

So, why Why WHY would Nelson say that he handcuffed Ruby, and that Ruby had no gun in his hand at the time?

It's because of what I've been telling you that there were two melees, an hour apart. The first involved the real Jack Ruby and was not televised or reported. The second involved FBI Agent James Bookhout masquerading as Ruby, and it was televised.

And of course the real Ruby didn't have a gun in his hand when Nelson cuffed him because Ruby did not shoot Oswald. So, where was Ruby's gun at the time? I presume it was still in his pocket.

But, in the frenzy of the fracas, as they were taking him uptstairs, somebody must have reached into Ruby's pocket and gotten his pistol. I say that because: how could they tell him that he shot Oswald if his gun was still in his pocket? What murderer shoots his victim and then puts his gun back in his pocket?

In the films that we have, particularly the KRLD film, we can see Detective LC Graves wrestling Ruby's gun out of his hand, and he held on to it. You can still see him later holding the gun.

So, what Nelson said in his 2013 interview conflicts with what we know happened on 11/24/63.

However, it doesn't mean that Nelson was necessarily lying. There were two events: the seizing of the real Ruby that happened an hour before, and then the televised spectacle that did not include the real Ruby, where James Bookhout played him, and they did the dog and pony show in the garage, that is part of JFK assassination lore.

So, maybe Nelson did handcuff Ruby at the first melee' with the real Ruby.

 It's nice when Artificial Intelligence agrees with you. This graphic was made by Chat GPT, and all the text is its, not mine. This hand of Oswald's from the Jackson photo is not a real hand. It is a freak hand. And they came up with it because Oswald wasn't really shot, and they had to cover the entire area of impact, since there was no trauma beneath it. THIS IS NOT AN ANATOMICAL HAND.