You want more proof that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, long before he was shot in the throat? Then look at Jackie in the Croft photo. Supposedly, nothing has happened yet. But, look at Jackie. Is she smiling and waving? No. She looks glum. She looks distraught. She was! I know where they got that image. It was from a January 1964 television address in which she and Bobby and Teddy went on air to thank Americans for their cards and letters. They pasted her image from that in here. Why? Because JFK was already shot in the back in the Croft photo, and she was turned and looking at him, just as she was in the Zapruder film. They couldn't have that here because it looms large and people would notice it. So, they pasted her image from the television address in here.

And notice that her hair is all wrong. I put a frame of Jackie from 11/22 before anything happened, and you can see that she was smiling and looking glamorous and dazzling. You can see that her hair was coiffed and blow-dried and styled. Look how matted her hair looks on the left. It wasn't that way on 11/22.

And look how far she has her head turned on the left. I was a chiropractor for 40 years, and I can tell you that adults don't turn their head that far. That is beyond the comfortable range for rotation. One can do it, but you're not going to unless you have to. And you have other options. You can turn your whole torso. You don't have to turn just your head. And she didn't do that. Look at her on the right. How much rotation is she doing there? She's doing much less.

And look how unnatural and geometric her hair looks, with that sharp, jutting angle that it has. THEY did that. And what they were trying to do was cover up JFK's mouth. Because: he was in a startled state. He had been shot in the back. It was just a little ice dart, but still,l he felt it. He startled from it, and his mouth was open. They had to cover that up, so they used her hair.

I'm telling you: JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, long before he was shot in the throat, and it is one of the biggest secrets of the JFK assassination.

 The Zapruder film revealed the secret of what happened from the first time we saw it. They tried, with all their might, to obscure it, but they failed miserably. I am talking about the fact that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill.

Look at frame 188. Jackie is already turned and looking at JFK. Why is she doing that? She's doing it because she knows that something is wrong with me. She isn't waving, and she NEVER resumes waving.

According to Officialdom, nothing has happened yet, but her focus is on him, and it remains on him. She has already withdrawn from the intended purpose of this political trip. She's finished with it, even though, supposedly, nothing has happened.

He supposedly, is waving, but was he? Notice that we don't see any of his facial features. His face is jsut a brown canvas. And his hand is arched way back. Try doing that. It's uncomfortable. It's not how people wave. That is an extreme motion to have your hand flexed back like that. You wouldn't do that when waving. You would just wave your hand without doing anything with your wrist. In other words, you would just relax. And why is the palm of his hand glistening white? He would have his hand turned towards the people he was waving at.

Then, in 190, Jackie is turned even more towards him. She is facing him squarely. And his hand looks like some weird claw. He isn't waving with it. He is just covering his face with it. That is, they were covering his face with it. He was shot in the back, and he was reacting to it. I'm sure his face showed it, so they covered up his face. And Jackie is totally focused on him. According to Officialdom, nothing happened before he disappeared behind the sign. But, this tells us that something happened, that he was shot in the back, and it was high on the hill .

And it took them years to get to this. The film-editing technology to do this did not exist in 1963. It didn't get developed until the 1970s. The Z-film was shown to the public in 1975, so 12 years later. It took almost that whole time to get the Zapruder film altered.

 When W.C. Attorney David Belin was asked where Oswald was going when he was stopped by Tippit at 10th and Patton, Belin said that he was going to Mexico. How did he know that? He didn't know it He just made it up. It wasn't based on anything but his imagination.

And when people pointed out to Belin that Oswald had only $14 on him, so how was he going to get to Mexico on that, Belin said that Oswald had his pistol, and he was just going to use it to rob people. How did he know that? Again, he didn't. He just made it up.

And he never really answered the question because what does 10th and Patton have to do with going to Mexico? Was there a bus station nearby there? What was his exact walking destination, and how did it relate to Mexico?

And why Mexico? Oswald denied going to Mexico when they asked him if he ever went to Mexico City. So, if he didn't go to Mexico then, why assume he would go to Mexico now?

And what was he going to do when he got to Mexico? And how was he going to live there? Was he just going to rob people indefinitely?

We know what Oswald's top priority was at that time. It was to get his family back under his roof again. We know he asked Marina about it on Thursday night. He showed her the $168 he had, which, at the time, was enough to rent a nice apartment. Marina said she told him she wasn't ready. But, she didn't rule it out. And they did spend the night together.

What Belin said is so ridiculous, so completely unfounded, that it deserves no further analysis. Belin was just spewing evil, and it's ironic because he was trying to paint a picture of Oswald as evil, but he really just demonostrated his own evil.

Oswald denied shooting Tippit, and it is impossible that he was at 10th and Patton. Oswald was in the Texas Theater by 1:07 accordding to Butch Burroughs, the popcorn man. Tippit wasn't shot until 1:15. Oswald was definitely in the theater at that time. Ipso facto, he could not have shot Tippit.

But, how did Oswald get to the theater? Someone must have driven him. It was 1.1 miles from his boarding room to the theater. He didn't get to his boarding house until 1. He sspent several minutes there. So, if it was 1:03 when he left, how did he get to the theater by 1:07? He couldn't have done it. He couldn't even have gotten to the theater by 1:15 . A fifteen minute mile is a fast walking pace. But, when you're in the city, you've got streets to cross, red lights to wait for, traffic to wait for, and people in your way, And why assume he would walk at anything but an ordinary pace?

So, what did Oswald say about how he got to the theater? We don't know. There isn't a word about it in any of the notes or reports. Didn't the police ask him? They must have. It is inconceivable that they didn't. The question of how Oswald got to the theater is integral to the question of whether he shot Tippit. Their not saying what he said about how he got to the theater tells me that whatever he said must have been extremely exonerating. And in all probability , what he said was that somebody drove him there. And if anybody drove him there, it destroys the lone gunman hypothesis. And if a policeman drove him there, that is 10x worse. And it probably was a policeman. His landlady Earlene Roberts said that a police car pulled up, and its horn was tapped twice. The most likely thing is that Oswald was driven to the Texas Theater in a police car. Who was the policeman? It could have been Tippit. He could have driven Oswald to the theater and then gone on to his destiny of being shot at approximately 1:15 at 10th and Patton. John Armstrong is also open to the possibility that it was Captain Westbrook and Lt. Croy who drove Oswald to the theater.

 In the Jackie Chan movie Dragons Forever, a character gets injected with a nerve agent during a fight. For a few seconds, he seems to be OK, but then his muscles start seizing up, as you see on the left.

That's what happened to JFK, except it was injected by way of an ice dart rather than a needle. There is absolutely nothing else that can explain JFK's muscular spasm and rigidity. It was NOT due to trauma. The only trauma he had, to that point, was a shallow wound in his back, affecting only soft, non-vital tissue, and a shallow wound in his throat, that damaged tracheal coils on his left side and caused a mild contusion in the apex of his right lung. That's it. We are seeing the effect of a nerve agent in JFK.

 So, Lovelady wore a short-sleeved striped shirt on 11/22/63, and there is no doubt about it. The Couch film proves it. But, never underestimate the resourcefulness of moden-day Kennedy-killers. In the image on the right, the evil Praymanites tried to make his shirt look plaid. But, what difference does it make? It's still short-sleeved, and no one ever claimed that Doorman's shirt was short-sleeved.

That shirt, on the left, is the same one that Lovelady wore to his FBI photo-shoot on 2/29/64, where they photographed him with the shirt unbuttoned. Those stupid FBI agents surely had the Altgens photo, and they thought all they had to do was unbutton Lovelady's short-sleeved striped shirt, and it would turn him into Doorman. It was mindless stupidity, one of the worst cases I've seen. And they put it in writing twice that Lovelady said he wore that shirt on 11/22. They tried to retract it later, but there's no retracting it. They reported it becausae he said it. And he wore it.

And Lovelady NEVER said that he as Doorman. The FBI said that he said it. But, think about it: if Lovelady could say it, wouldn't they have put him behind a sea of cameras and microphones to say it? And, if he could say it, wouldn't the HSCA have ordered him to come in and say it to them? Why would they bypass him? Why did they bypass him? It was because Lovelady was a terrible liar. Even if they threatened to kill him and his family, and they probably did, that doesn't turn him into a good actor. And it doesn't turn him into a good liar.

And then, he just happened to die, suddenly and unexpectedly, at the tender age of 41 right right when the HSCA Final Report came out? I don't believe in coincidences when it comes to the JFK assassination. I believe that Lovelady was murdered. Maybe they used the heart attack gun on him, as they used on Kennedy. But, if so, they used it differently on each of them. On Kennedy, they plied it with a nerve agent, the effects of which we can see in the Zapruder film. But, with Lovelady, they must have plied it with the heart attack-mimetic drugs. Do you realize that sudden and unexpected heart attacks were rather common in the world of JFK persons of interest? Billy Lovelady, David Sanchez Morales, and Richard Case Nagell are three.

Billy Lovelady was a tragic figure. He died a wealthy man, with vast real estate holdings across the state of Colorado. At the TSBD, he worked for $1.11/hour. But, what good did all that money do him? He lived a miserable life, and they snuffed him out at the end. They did to him what they do to male chicks at an egg fctory.

The JFK assassination involved three murders that weekend, but it was just the beginning of the killling. Many more were killed over the years that followed to preserve the Big Lie that Oswald did it- and did it alone. But, that story is going to die. The assassination of JFK was a banana republic style coup d'etat. Awareness of that is going to become universal, not just in the U.S. but around the world. And what life is going to be like after that is anyone's guess.

 Above in this collage is Shelley and Lovelady walking to the railroad yard among the throng of people who did that after the shooting. It's from the Malcolm Couch film. Skinny Shelley, with his pompadore hair, wore a jacket. Lovelady, who was stocky at the time, wore a shrt-sleeved striped shirt. Below are other images of them: Shelley getting into a police car on 11/22; and Lovelady on 2/29/64 posing as Doorman for the FBI. You can see that it's them, wearing those clothes.

Now, that is them, and it can't not be them. You can't deny it because if that's not them, if that's two other guys who just happened to look like them and dress like them, then they still have to be there because that is where they said they were. In other words, you need two sets, not just one. But, this is the only set; so it must be them. And you can see that Lovelady's shirt was short-sleeved. You can see bare skin above his elbow.

So, Lovelady did NOT wear a long-sleeved plaid shirt on 11/22/63. He wore a short-sleeved striped shirt, just as he told the FBI, and which they put in writing twice.

Don't anyone spout the Lovelady claim here again. It is a lie, and I won't tolerate it.

 Donnie Mykenzie

The doorway man is Oswald. There is no doubt it is Oswald. First thing. Look at how high the hair curl is on the doorway man. Just look. Lovelady has no hair . Oswald has lots of hair , just like the doorman. You just have to look. It's hard to tell because of the black background but if you really look , you will see that the image is Oswald. Second. What i did was put The doorman photo in an Ai program with Lovelady and Oswald. You can go and do this yourself. But do not be bias. The Ai program gave me a list of reasons why this picture of the doorman is Oswald and not Lovelady. It looked through their features , their clothes , their hair and everything else it could pick up and the Ai program said it was 100% Oswald. That's not me saying this , it's an Ai computer program and not just some cheap one you get online. So , just check yourself so you can be sure.

• 5m
• Reply
• Share

Ralph Cinque

Donnie Mykenzie Thank you, Donnie. I am going to share this. You just made an impact.