I know that when you first hear that JFK was hit with an ice dart that contained a nerve agent that it's hard to believe. So, I am writing this concise statement about it. 

First, I already proved that the freeway sign in the Zapruder film is bogus, and if you haven't seen my video about it, here is the link. You can watch it afterwards. Finish reading this first. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiJMrM_QKyc

So, the "story" of the Zapruder film is that JFK was fine and dandy until he disappeared behind the enormous and very concealing freeway sign, and he was shot behind the sign, and when he emerged his mind was gone; he was mute; he was totally helpless; and his muscles were acting very weirdly as they spasmed and the spasming spread. 

So, that much we can see. But, what happened to him behind that sign to cause all those effects. Exactly what trauma did he receive? 

Well, the official story, of course, has it that he received the Single Bullet that went through him. But, that story is a lie. I'm not going to go into here, but if the Single Bullet Theory is a lie, then the default is that JFK experienced just what Dr. Humes and the Bethesda doctors found and described: a very shallow wound in his back. And he also experienced the wound in his throat that Dr. Perry found at Parkland Hospital in Dallas. And he also experienced the massive head wound that was described very differently by the Bethesda doctors than it was described by the Parkland doctors. I won't go into that because that came later. So, at the time that JFK emerged from behind the freeway sign with all his weirdness, he had just experienced the shallow back wound that damaged no vital tissue, and the throat wound of Dr. Perry, and that is all.  

Those wounds could not have destroyed JFK's mind, as seen in the Zapruder film, nor could they have caused the bizarre neuro-muscular manifestations that he exhibited in the Zapruder film. 

So, physical trauma did not cause the effects on him that we see in the Z-film. 

But, let's return to the back wound. If it was as shallow as the Bethesda doctors reported, the missile could not have been a metal bullet because a metal bullet could not have stopped that short. When you consider the velocity and momentum of the bullet, and the amount of resistance needed to dissipiate all its energy in order to stop it, an inch and a half of soft tissue in JFK's back was not enough to do that; to stop it. But, if the missile were ice, ice is unstable, and it bursts easily. So, it could stop that short, not because of resistance acting on the bullet, in the classical physics sense, but because the ice burst and was instantly gone. 

But, the bottom line is that we know that in the 1950s, the CIA developed such a gun that could do that: deliver an ice dart containing one or more toxins, and causing a very shallow wound. It was called the CIA heart attack gun:

https://www.maloriesadventures.com/blog/the-c-i-a-heart-attack-gun-the-weapon-that-leaves-no-trace

Not only was the gun found, but stockpiles of shellfish toxin (a neurotoxin) and cobra venom (another neurotoxin) were found. CIA director William Colby answered questions about it to the Church Committee, and when asked if the gun was ever used on anyone, Colby said no. He actually had the nerve to claim that it was intended as a suicide weapon that agents could use to off themselves- if necessary. And that is ridiculous. Weren't potassium cyanide tablets better and more efficient for that purpose? But, Colby was no fool. He certainly wasn't going to say that the CIA shot people with it, including JFK. He'd have been killed if he said that, and I believe he was killed anyway.  

So, the ice gun with intoxicants was definitely in the possession of the CIA in 1963, and they had developed it.

All that's left is to present the evidence for JFK's intoxication, which comes mainly from what we see in the Zapruder film. First: his weird muscular dyskinesia that could only have been drug-induced, not trauma-induced. 

Then, there was also the testimonial evidence, particularly from Jackie Kennedy that JFK never spoke. The last thing he said in his life was in response to Nellie Connally before anything happened. She said to him that you certainly can't say that the people of Dallas didn't turn out for you, and he said, "I certanily can't." That was on Elm Street shortly before he was shot, and he never said anything after he was shot. His muteness was NOT due to the throat shot. It damaged coils on the left side of his trachea, but it did not damage his larynx. His voice would have sounded different, but he could have spoken. But, he did not speak, nor did he attempt to speak, and it was due to his complete mental collapse. 

Again: JFK's complete mental collapse cannot be ascribed to his physical trauma to that point. And his neuromuscular derangement, so apparent in the Zapruder film, cannot be attributed to physical trauma either. And that leaves poisoning as the only plausible explanation for those phenomena. And the means to shoot those toxins into him definitely existed in 1963, and with direct ties to the CIA. 

I am going to walk you through it, one step at a time. First, observe that JFK's fist is under his face. It looks more like a hoof than a hand, but we'll put that aside.

But you know, that if his fist is under his face, the farthest his arm can extend out is to the side is his elbow. Here I am doing it, and there is no alternative to this.

So, what is happening in the Altgens photo? What is Jackie grasping? How could his arm be extending all the way out to where her hands are? It's impossible.

What do you think would happen if you put a man and woman in the back of a car and tried to duplicate this? It wouldn't look like this. He would have his elbow bent, as I did, and she would have to be much closer to hiim. She would have to be right next to him. She couldn't be so far away from him that all we could see is her hands. Where is the rest of her? I inserted an image of her to show you how ridiculous it is to think that it looked like this.

 When I first started studying the Altgens photo, I was so focused on the doorway, that I didn’t notice that the whole photo was temporally altered. It is time-shifted and space-shifted. The “story” of the Altgens photo is that it was taken after JFK was shot in the throat, which means that it was taken when the limo was across from the pergola. But, that isn’t true. It was taken before he was shot in the throat, when the limo was still high on the hill, across from the TSBD, just 30 yards from the intersection.

But, the photo shows him reacting to the throat shot, and I tell you that that imagery is fake. And I can prove it.

So, where on Elm Street was JFK when the photo was taken? Well, we’ve got the lineup of cars to use as a measuring stick. There are just 3 cars behind Kenndy, and then you’re in the intersection. They’re all close together except for the distance between the Queen Mary and LBJ’s car, and I suspect that’s because LBJ told the driver to stay back, knowing that bullets were going to be flying.

So, JFK’s distance from the intersection was the length of the trunk of the limo, the length of the Queen Mary, the gap to LBJ’s car, the length of LBJ’s car (which was a compact) and then the length of the VEEP SS car, which was also rather small. Add that up, and that’s how far JFK was from Houston St. And that means that he wasn’t far from the intersection.  And it means that he wasn’t shot in the throat yet.

Also, notice how curved the road is. Look on the right at the angle of the curb. It’s round. That is a lot of curve. Doesn’t that have to be the curve from Houston St.? What else could it be?

Then, right there on the curve, there is a guy clapping. That’s supposed to be Charles Brehm, except the road wasn’t curved where he was. It was straight. And he wasn’t up by the intersection across from the TSBD. He was down the hill across from the pergola. He was in the country; not in the city. That’s how I like to put it. So, they just installed those clapping hands there to represent him; to tell the story that this was all happening much lower on Elm and much farther on the intersection.

Now, Altgens said in his testimony that he pressed the shudder to take his picture right when he heard the first shot. The throat shot was NOT the first shot. And even it were, the photo shows JFK and Jackie after the shot, when he was in a panic and she was attending to him. The first shot was the back shot, and it did strike him high on the hill, just a little past the intersection. And, as I have told you, it wasn’t a bullet. It was an ice flechette containing a toxic payload, including a nerve agent.

Now, if you haven’t been following me, and you are hearing it for the first time, I get it that it sounds looney. But, it is not looney. The Zapruder film shows us that JFK suffered a complete mental collapse, including the inability to speak. His muteness was not due to the throat shot because it didn’t hit his larynx. It was due to his mental collapse. And his bizarre muscle spasms, seen in the Zapruder film, were due to nerve agent toxicity. Moreover, once you dismiss the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory, you realize that he had only a very shallow wound in his back. A metal bullet could not have stopped that short, but an ice bullet could because ice is unstable and bursts easily.

Notice that none of the spectators in the Altgens photo seem to be aware that anything is wrong. They are smiling.  That’s because the photo was taken very early and long before JFK was shot in the throat.

Now, look at Clint Hil on the standing board. Notice how relaxed he looks. He is NOT poised to act. He is not about to go into motion. He is not about to jump off and catch up with the limo. He is totally planted there like he doesn’t have a care in the world. He is not aware of anything, and he is not going anywhere. It hasn’t reached that point yet. It’s far from it.

Now, let’s consider the imagery of JFK and Jackie. His left hand is too big, and his right hand is shriveled. His arm is extending out like a vacuum wand, way past the limit of his body. Where she is grasping it is way beyond him. His elbow was bent. That long thing can’t possibly be his arm.  She might as well be a mile away from him.  It is a bogus image that replaced whatever was there. And what was there was JFK reacting to having been shot in the back.

So, they developed the Altgens photo and saw right away that it contained Oswald in the doorway, and it also showed JFK reacting to being shot in the back high on the hill, which no one was supposed to know about, let alone see.  They should have destroyed it instantly. But, those brazen, reckless operatives, drunk with arrogance and power, cock-sure they could get away with anything, decided to fix it.  And they blew it big-time. And they even added the hole in the windshield. They must have heard about it, and they wanted to link this photo to it. Why? Because it came later. They didn't care about the implications. If people wanted to think that JFK was shot through the windshield, they didn't care. They knew it wasn't going to go anywhere.

Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady both said they left the entrance immediately after the shooting and joined the throng of people who poured into the railway yard. This is them as seen in the Couch film. They were walking down the sidewalk on the utility road in front of the building.

Now, there’s no doubt that it’s them. They were both the same height, 5’8”. Shelley was slender and had pompadour hair. He wore a jacket. And Lovelady is wearing the clothes that he told the FBI he wore. They both said that they were there doing that.

Now, if that’s not them, it means that they still have to be there, that there has to be another couple of men there like those two. But, there aren’t. There is just those two. And that means that those two are them, Shelley and Lovelady.

 So, there is Billy Lovelady on 11/22/63 alongside Doorman and Oswald. You can see that Oswald and Doorman are wearing the exact same clothes, and Lovelady is wearing very different clothes.

What I have been telling you is the truth: Billy Lovelady did not wear a plaid shirt. That was a lie that they concocted. He wore a short sleeved striped shirt. And he looked nothing like Oswald or Doorman.

The truth is that Doorman was Oswald, and your government has not only been lying to you about it; but they are the ones who killed Kennedy and Oswald.

Lovelady did NOT wear a plaid shirt, and Doorman’s shirt isn’t plaid anyway. It’s true that Lovelady posed in a plaid shirt, but he feared for his life. He knew they’d kill him if he didn’t. And they killed him anyway, unless you think they just got lucky that he died of a fatal first heart attack at the age of 41 right when the HSCA Final Report was coming out.

I was not the one who discovered the images of Shelley and Lovelady in the Couch film. That was Gerda Dunkel, and it was about 15 years ago.  And her discovery of them is surely the most important discovery in JFK assassination research in the 21^st century.

 Congresswoman Luna, I'm sure that what NBC has is the unaltered Dave Wiegman film. He was an NBC photographer, and he was in the 7th car in the motorcade, which was the first camera car, a convertible. He captured Oswald in the doorway as he rounded the corner. But, the film was deliberately blurred to obscure Oswald. This is it. And as in the Altgens photo, Oswald was clasping his hands in front, which was his habit. Ralph Cinque

 There was no Prayer Man. He was nobody. He was invented. He was concocted. And when he was first introduced in 1991 in Oliver Stone’s film JFK, there was no claim that he was Oswald.

It’s claimed that the Prayer Man clip came from the Darnell film, although most renderings don’t show it. For a long time, no versions showed it.

What happened was that the beginning of the Darnell film was cut from it.  Apparently, it showed something that they didn’t want us to see. It was finally shown in 1991, 28 years later, and it was in Oliver Stone’s movie JFK, but it was heavily altered. Oliver Stone was bamboozled. They had 28 years to do it.  And when they showed it then, there was no claim that Prayer Man was Oswald. The purpose of showing it then was to show Officer Marrion Baker running to the entrance. Except it doesn’t do that. The running cop was not Baker. He was another officer.

There is an excellent presentation about it by a guy who used to go by the name Saintly Oswald.  The gist of it is that the running cop came from a different location than Baker parked his bike. And it’s at the end of the clip that the real Baker arrived, pulling up and parking his bike on the island with the traffic light, which was directly across from the doorway, and they inserted a walking man in a suit to cover him up. Watch this video and you’ll see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFMQl61nx-U

So, why do I say that Prayer Man didn’t exist? It’s because none of the people in the Darnell doorway existed. It was just 10 seconds after the shots, so the same people should be there who were there before. But, we don’t recognize any of them. You can click on the picture to blow it up.

None of these people can be correlated with any of the people who were known to be there. None of them match any of the other images of the doorway. And what it shows, which is people flocking into the TSBD right after the shots, didn’t happen. Who are those people? You can’t identify a single one of them.

Some people have tried to claim that the guy at the top of the steps in the white pajama top was Frazier, but that is ridiculous. Frazier wore a black jacket. I don’t mean a suit jacket. It was a short jacket, and it looked like something from school. It had lettering on the back of it. He wasn’t in white. But furthermore, and more important is the fact that that guy at the top of the steps is a freak. He isn’t human. No human could be built like that. No human could stand like that. He is a freak. Everything about his shape and his angles is cartoonish. He is art; very bad, crappy art.

We can’t identify any of those people. This is all fabrication, including Prayer Man. His problem is that his head is way too small in proportion to his massive body. If he were real, he would be a case of microcephaly. And to claim that he is Oswald is totally absurd. Oswald was 5’9” 131 pounds. The Dallas Police weighed and measured him. He was skinny. If he were any skinnier, he’d have been emaciated. How could that fat tub be Oswald?

The Prayer Man myth started in the UK.  Why are so many Brits obsessed with the JFK assassination? It’s because they are recruited to do social media JFKing.  Why Brits? It’s because they speak English, yet, they are far removed. And the same goes for Aussies. There are a lot of them in the Prayer Man Cult too.

Oswald was the Altgens Doorman, and the Prayer Man cult was started to muddy the waters.  Pay no attention to the evil Prayermanites.  They are up to no good, and they are part of the whole evil world of JFKing.  And there is something else that they did that I will show you next time, and it’s quite shocking.

 Now, I am going to discuss the situational evidence that supports the photographic evidence that Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting. And it’s not that the photographic evidence needs help. The photographic evidence is conclusive. It’s like in fingerprint matching. Once they get up to, say, 14 matching points between two fingerprints, that’s it. It’s the same guy. And the matching points between Oswald and Doorman are easily that high.

But, I want you to understand the situational evidence because it will show you just how disingenuous and bankrupt the Lovelady talking heads are.

The first is that Oswald told investigators that he was out in front, and he named someone who was there: Bill Shelley. How did Oswald know that Shelley was there?  And of course, Shelley was there? Oswald knew it because he was also there. He even parsed it that way. He said that he was out in front with Bill Shelley. To me it implies that there was some interaction between the two of them; that they had an exchange. And I do believe they did. I believe that Shelley ordered Oswald to go to the lunchroom. And that’s why Oswald did it; not to get a Coke.

But, the bottom line is that the ONLY way Oswald could have known that Shelley was out in front was by being there himself.

The second point takes us to the 2^nd  floor lunchroom and what happened there. We know, for an absolute fact, that at 12:31, plus some seconds, Oswald was spotted by Officer Marrion Baker, and Oswald was on the move. Oswald was moving through the vestibule of the lunchroom and into the lunchroom. In other words, Oswald was just getting to the lunchroom. So, what does that mean?

Well, first, since he was just getting there at 12:31+, it means that he wasn’t there at 12:30. It means that he was somewhere else at 12:30. Is it possible that he was there at 12:30, but then got up and left, heading somewhere else for 30 seconds or so, and then changed his mind, and went back to the lunchroom? It was physically possible, theoretically, yes. But, no one has the right to assume it. It is not a card in anyone’s hand. There is no basis to go there, mentally. If it looked like Oswald was just getting to the lunchroom at 12:31+, then by all outward appearances, he came from somewhere else to get there. There is no reason, no basis, and no intellectual right to assume anything else. I am not making the rules here, but I am enforcing them.

So, where was Oswald before he went to the lunchroom? To answer that, you have to understand the mechanics of the maze. One thing is certain: Oswald got into the vestibule of the lunchroom either by going through the door on the office side, or by going through the door on the stairwell side, through which Baker was looking. We can answer that question. The vestibule was so small, that if Oswald had gone through the door on the stairwell side, then that door would have still been open. It was a spring door. When you let it go, it slowly closed. It didn’t slam shut. It had a spring that slowly closed it. It was such a tiny little room that there is no way that door could have closed at all if Oswald was still in the room-had he gone through it. But, he didn’t. Oswald went through the door on the office side, and that’s why there was no movement in the door through which Baker was looking. And when he say he was looking through the door, I mean through the glass in the door.

But, there’s more because Oswald and Baker got to the lunch room at essentially the same time. Oswald was a little bit ahead of him. When Baker saw Oswald in the vestibule, they were probably no more than 15 feet apart. Knowing how massive the building was, 15 feet wasn’t much.

So, if Oswald had come down from the 6^th floor, Baker would have seen him and heard him before he entered the vestibule. And forget about Baker because Truly was well ahead of Baker. Do you remember what I said about them looking for an armed killer, and Truly having no qualms about leading the way?

So, how could Oswald have come down from the 6^th floor without running into Truly? He couldn’t have because he surely would have. So, that is more proof that Oswald did not come down from the 6^th floor. So, how did he reach the office side of the vestibule?

There is only one way, and that is, that he climbed the one flight of stairs in the southeast corner of the building. There is simply no other way he could have gotten there. But, where was he before he got to the stairs? Well, the stairs were right next to the doorway. All you had to do was go through the double doors and then turn right. There was a stairwell there for that one flight of stairs. So, the situation proves that Oswald went from the doorway to the 2^nd floor lunch room.

And another thing that works is the timeline. I told you that Oswald’s departure from the doorway happened right when Dave Wiegman was passing the building. I told you that there must have been a commotion over it that caused Wiegman to do a second pan of the doorway- which he did. All you have to do is watch the Wiegman film, and you’ll see that Wiegman captured the doorway spontaneously the first time, but the second time, he did it deliberately. He actually swung around to his right to pan the doorway a second time. It is 2026, but we can see that in the film as through we were there in 1963. And then, as I told you, Oswald had gone, and so they replaced him with a still image, so that there would be a Doorman there.

But, think about the time. It was close to the time of the fatal head shot, but I think it was  a little bit before it.  Do you realize that Baker parked his bike right on the Elm Street island? In other words, he parked right directly across from the doorway. And all he had to do was run across that utility street in front of the building, and he was at the doorway. So, he did that, and Truly offered to help him. They ran to the back of the building. They tried to secure an elevator, but when they realized they were not working, they went to the stairs in the northwest corner, with Truly leading. And that is some weird shit, that Truly wanted to lead the way in search of a ruthless killer.

But, the difference was that Truly and Baker were scurrying. I don’t know that you could say they were running, but they were certainly moving fast.  But, Oswald who left the doorway before they did, was surely only walking. I assume he walked at his normal pace. So, Oswald started first, but he was just walking. Baker and Truly started some seconds later, but they were moving faster. And the result was that even though they covered the same distance going different paths, they got to the lunch room about the same time.

And actually, Truly was ahead of Oswald, because Truly would have seen him in the vestibule, just as Baker did, but he didn’t because Oswald hadn’t gotten there yet.

So, what we can conclude is that Truly got there first; Oswald got there second; and Baker got there third.

But, knowing the trek that Oswald took to get to the lunchroom tells us that his starting point must have been the doorway.

Remember too that Carolyn Arnold said that she saw Oswald at the doorway shortly before the shooting. She told that to FBI Agent Richard Emberling on Monday, November 26. By “at the doorway” I mean that the entrance to the building was glass: clear glass. The door and the whole wall were glass. So, she saw Oswald peering through the glass from the inside. So, he was at the doorway. She put the time at 12:25. Emberling wrote down 12:15, thinking that that would have left Oswald enough time to get upstairs to shoot Kennedy.  But, higher-ups at the FBI, upon seeing it, realized that it was no good. They stormed back there, like the Gestapo, in March and demanded that she sign a statement saying that she didn’t see Oswald at all that day.  And she did. She was a pregnant 19 year old girl. She wasn’t going to mess with the FBI.

Then, 15 years later, in 1978, the story got published that Carolyn Arnold had recently revised her story and said that she saw Oswald eating in the 2^nd floor lunch room at 12:25 when she was heading downstairs. You know that can’t be true from what I’ve told you. Since Oswald was just getting to the lunch room at 12:31, he could not have been there at 12:30.

I don't know what to make of the Carolyn Arnold revision. Was she threatened? Was she bribed? Was it even her? I'm not sure it was. The whole thing may have been a ruse.

The best treatment of the Carolyn Arnold affair was by Professor Gerald McKnight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission failed the nation and why.  I had the privilege of knowing him. I never met him in person, but I talked to him on the phone, quite a few times. He was on hospice at the time, but he was still mentally sound. And I really think he enjoyed our conversations. It was from Dr. McKnight that I learned that the Dallas Police weighed Oswald, and he was only 131 pounds, and he was 5’9”.  That is really skinny. I’m 5’6” and I weight 145.  Lovelady was 5’8” 170, but that was 3 months later. I’d bet you dimes to dollars he was more like 180 on 11/22/63. So, the claim that Oswald and Lovelady looked alike is poppycock.

Folks, there is no doubt that the Altgens Doorman was Oswald, and the fight over it is the Armageddon of the JFK world.  It is the ultimate battle between Good and Evil.

I have shown you that the situational evidence fully supports the photographic evidence for Oswald in the doorway.  There is going to be a reckoning.  I say we tear down the whole stinking edifice of lies, and we do it over this. Stop the lies. Oswald outside.