I just came across some very interesting information about the Dal-Tex building. I have known for a long time that the TSBD occupied the first floor of it until the summer of 1963, when they moved into the 411 Elm, which is the building we know as the TSBD. What I just learned is that the first floor of theo Dal-Tex was unoccupied in November 1963 , and so was the second floor.

The third floor had garment manufacturers. The 4th and 5th floor had Abraham Zapruder's company Jennifer Junior. The 6th floor had Dallas Uranium and Oil, an attorney, and a belt manufacturer. And the 7th floor had various miscellaneous professional offices.

But, the point is that if the 1st and 2nd floors were unoccupied, it means that placing a shooter at a 2nd floor window should not have been a problem.

Still, somebody had to own the building. I found out that the Dal-Tex building got sold on November 1, 1963. The person who bought it was a woman. Her name was Sylvia Golden Russ. Actually, she already owned half of it. She was the widow of Morris Russ, who had died at the young age of 56 in 1955. The cause of his death is unknown. He had owned it with a business partner whose name was David Weisblat.

So, in late October, Russ's widow Sylvia bought out Weisblat's half of the Dal-Tex building, and on November 1, 1963, she became the sole owner of it. We're talking about a 7 story professoinal office bulding in downtown Dallas owned by one person.

The most important thing to me is that the 1st and 2nd floors were unoccupied, which made a 2nd floor window available and accessible to a shooter. And it supports my theory that the CIA "heart attack" gun was the gun used because it was very quiet. Look at this testimony from the Church Committee:

Sen. Frank Church: "So that when it fires, it fires silently?"

William Colby: "Almost silently; yes."

That's what you want in a situation like that, so that you could fire it on the 2nd floor and not disturb or alert anyone on the 3rd floor or higher.

 So, when did Jackie turn to her husband and remain focused on him for the duration? I can tell you. First, here is frame 168 in which you can see that she was doing her job, engaging with the spectators on her side of the street. Then, if we jump to frame 175, which is supposed to be about a third of a second later, she has turned to where she is facing straight ahead. Then by frame 185, which is like half a second later, she is about 45 degree to JFK. Then at frame 190, she is facing him squarely and looking at him.

From that point on, she ceased doing her politiking, and she was focused exclusively on him. She never waved again. But, according to the official story, nothing happened to JFK until he was shot about 223. Why then did she start focusing on him so early? It's because he was shot in the back; that's why. I'm not saying she knew that at the time, but she knew that something was wrong; that he was in trouble. And that's why she stayed focused on him.

The official story, that JFK wasn't hit until he was hit with the Single bullet when he was behind the sign and out of view, is a lie. He was hit in the back high on the hill, and it was a very unusual shot. It was not a kill shot. And it wouldn't be very smart to shoot someone on the right side of their back if you were out to kill them. Connally got hit on the right side of his back, and he survived. If you were trying to kill him, wouldn't you shoot him on the left side where the heart is?

But, they weren't trying to kill hiim. They didn't want to kill him high on the hill. They absolutely wanted to wait until he got to the lower part where there were few spectators. They didn't want a lot of eyes on it.

The fact that Jackie started turning to her husband in the 170s and had her eyes squarely on him by the late 180s tells us something. It tell us that he was in trouble then, and she knew it. And when I say he was in trouble, I mean that he was shot.

 The official story of the JFK assassination is not just wrong; it is ludicrous and preposterously wrong. Oswald did not even own a rifle, and other researchers have said so, such as John Armstrong and Gil Jesus. John Armstrong did the definitive work on it.

https://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html

Oswald said he didn't own a rifle. And if you claim to be an Oswald defender, you have to believe him. You can't call him a liar. If he didn't commit any crime (and he didn't) then it would have been VERY stupid to lie to the Police about anything. And Oswald wasn't stupid.

And when first asked about it on November 22, Marina said that Lee used to own a rifle, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia to go rabbit-hunting. The mail-order rifle story was concocted by the FBI, and they knew that it would NEVER hold up in court. The situation was so bad for them that they couldn't let Oswald talk to a lawyer because they knew he would tell the lawyer that he didn't own a rifle. And then, with the greatest of ease, the lawyer would have confirmed that it was true, and then, he or she would have realized that the FBI were the bad guys. You can be sure it was FBI Agent James W. Bookhout who ordered Fritz not to let Oswald have a lawyer.

So, since Oswald did not own or order a rifle, he could not possibly have shot Kennedy. But, it gets worse than that. There is solid evidence that the bogus rifle that Oswald didn't own never made it to New Orleans. Both Ruth Panie and Marina testified that it was not among his possessions when he moved to New Orleans. And then after that, the bogus rifle that never made it to New Orleans, it never mde it back to Irving. The story that Oswald snuck his rifle into Ruth Paine's station wagon and just hoped that, somehow, it would wind up in her garage without her knowing, and just remain there, is preposterous. Nobody would do that. And when I say nobody, I mean that not one of the 8 1/2 billion people on Earth would do that.

The story of the paper bag is preposterous. The first bag they showed us was obviously not just paper and tape; it was a real manufactured paper bag. Neither Frazier, Ruth, nor Marina reported seeing Oswald with any paper. Troy West said he never saw Oswald milling around the mailing area. And the whole idea that he would "make a bag " is preposterous. Nobody would do that either. Nobody makes bags. If anything, he would have just laid the paper out, and put the rifle parts on it, and wrapped and taped it until it was some kind of package. But no, the damn idiots made it that he started out by making a bag, the dumb plucks.

And then, when he was ready to access the rifle parts, instead of tearing the paper, he preserved the bag. He opened the bag and poured the contents out, so that the bag would remain intact. And it wasn't even torn. We're talking about jagged rifle parts in paper, and him walking several blocks with it. Yet, with all that jostling, the paper never tore, and that is amazing- that they would make up such a story.

Now, since Oswald didn't own a rifle, he wasn't shooting at Kennedy from the 6th floor, and there wasn't anything else he was donig on the 6th floor. Therefore, he wasn't on the 6th floor during the motorcade. Where was he? He was in the doorway, AND THAT IS THE ONLY PLACE HE COULD HAVE BEEN. Nothing else works. He wasn't working filling book orders. He wasn't eating because he said he ate early in the lunch break in the first floor lunch room, and that after he was done eating, he went outside to watch the Presidential Parade. We have it written down in James Hosty's own handwriting. What the hell more do you need?

So no, Oswald was NOT in the 2nd floor lunch room eating during the motorcade, even though that is what Oliver Stone depicted in the movie JFK, regrettably. There is NO CHANCE that Oswald was there. And that's because he just got to the second floor lunch room at 12:31+ when Officer Baker first saw him. Oswald was on the move just entering the lunch room when Baker first saw him. And since he just got there at 12:31+, it means he wasn't there at 12:30. You can't claim that he was there, and then left, and then came back. That goes way beyond reasonable speculation.

He wasn't on the phone during the motorcade. He wasn't reading a book. He wasn't writing a love letter to Marina or to Judyth Baker, if you buy her story, which I don't. You can't suggest that he was in the bathroom sitting on the throne with a belly ache because you don't know that, and you can't just make something up. He was in the doorway during the motorcade, just as he said. And that runs the gamut. There is no place else he could have been.

From the beginning, the whole Lovelady story was a lie that our government told, and I mean our FBI, which told it, and our CIA, which helped by providing the photo-alterers to alter the Altgens photo, trying to turn Oswald into Lovelady, and also blacking out the face of the real Lovelady, since they couldn't have two Loveladys.

And the truth is that Oswald citing Bill Shelley in the doorway is strong evidence that he, Oswald, was there himself because how else could he know that Shelley was there? And no, he didn't just gamble and say it without knowing. Remember: Oswald hadn't done anything. So, he had no reason to lie and no reason to make anything up. He said he was "out with Bill Shelley in front" because he was.

Oswald never shot at Walker. Since he didn't own a rifle, he couldn't have. But, witnesses at the scene said that there were two assailants, and they each drove off in separate cars. Well, Oswald had no gun, no car, no driver's license, no ability to drive, and he didn't have any friends either. And the bullet they dug out of Walker's window frame wasn't consistent with the Carcano bullets.

But, the story went on to include him leaving a fail-safe note for Marina, in case he got killed or apprehended. This was her emergency to-do list. The very first thing on the list was to go to the P.O. Box. But, why the heck would he have put that in? The only thing that came to the P.O. Box, according to Postal Inspector Harry Hines, were Russian and Socialist newspapers. I'm sure that that was a lie. Oswald was not spending money on Russian and Socialist newspapers. They barely had enough money for food.

But, why at a time like that would he fuss about the P.O. Box? He wouldn't. He couldn't. He didn't. The whole letter was bogus, but, the reason the plotters put the P.O. Box at the top of the list was to sell the idea that Oswald confirmed that he had a P.O. Box. He didn't have one, and they never even asked him if he had one. They didn't need to ask him beccause they knew he didn't have one.

Getting back to the 6th floor, Oswald wasn't on it during the motorcade, but do you know who was? Bobbie Ray Williams. He ate his lunch up there alone: some fried chicken and a Dr. Pepper. There is a photograph that shows the bottle he left behind and the empty carton. So, if he was up there eating (and he was), how could Oswald have been assembling the Sniper's Nest without encountering Bobbie Ray?

Oswald supposedly brought the rifle he didn't own unassembled. And he brought no tools, such as a screwdriver, with which to assemble it. And there was no screwdriver found up there. So, the Warren Commission helped themselves to the conclusion that he used a dime as a screwdriver to assemble the rifle.

Well, in that scenario, Oswald had a heck of a lot to do. He had to retrieve his non-existent rifle from wherever he hid it. He had to assemble it using a dime as a screwdriver. He had to decide which window he was going to shoot from. And he had to assemble the boxes of books to create an enclosure and a perch for himself.

So, if he had to do all that, wouldn't he have gotten started ASAP? But, Oswald started by eating his lunch in the first floor lunch room.

Now, I like to eat as much as the next guy, but if I knew I was going to be shooting the President of the United States, that would put me off my lunch. I couldn't eat under that situation. I would have no appetite at all But, even if he had a roaring appetite and an iron stomach, Oswald would have had no time to eat. So, how could he calmly eat his cheese sandwiches and an apple in the domino room, knowing that he had all that to do?

And then, his first sighting after the assassination proves that he didn't come down from the 6th floor. Officer Baker saw him moving through the anteroom of the lunch room, but if he had gone through the door that Baker saw him through (which had a glass window) that door would have still been moving. It was a tiny little room, no bigger than a closet. And if Oswald had come down from the 6th floor on the same stairs that Baker and Truly were on, they surely would have heard him, and probably seen him. Oswald would surelry have run into Truly because Truly was well ahead of Baker. Since Oswald only got to the lunch room a little ahead of Baker, he surely came from the office side of the second floor. And that means that he used the elegant stairs in the southeast corner of the building that were next to the doorway, and then he walked across the great expanse of the 2nd floor to get to the lunch room in the northwest corner. So, Oswald went from the doorway to the 2nd floor lunch room in that way, and when he was finished, he went back down the same way he went up. And then, he went outside and got photographed a second time in the doorway talking to the cop who was guarding the entrance.

We live in a Bizarro World that anybody takes the official story of the JFK assassination seriously. The story is and was so preposterous, so non-credible, that there wasn't a snowball's chance in Hell that they were going to try Oswald. They had kill Oswald, and they knew that beforehand, and from the very beginning. They hoped some cop would take him out in the theater, but that didn't happen. Then, they hoped they'd have a chance to kill him at the Midnight Press Conference, but that didn't work out either. And before you object, think about how abnormal it was to give him a press conference. And then, they finally got it done (his killing) on Sunday morning. But, they actually confiscated his wife on Saturday evening. They got her out of Ruth Paine's house, never to return, and she spent the night at the Executor Inn being guarded by the Secret Service, who took control of her on Sunday morning before Oswald was killed. But, when you are charging a man with double murder in a death penalty case, you can't confiscate his wife. But, they knew that he was a dead man walking, and they just jumped the gun a little, taking custody of her a little too soon.

Our government did this. It was the CIA, the FBI, the Vice President, and with involvement from other players from within the government. They killed Kennedy, and they killed Tippit and Oswald too. And they have been lying to us about it for 63 years. Well, they are not getting away with it. The truth is coming out. And there will be a reckoning. That is an unstoppable fate; there is nothing the government shills and lapdogs can do to stop it.

 This gif shows Jackie pressing down on JFK's arm trying to get him to relax it and put it down. She did get it lower, but it was mainly by tipping him. He did not relax. He was unable to. 

 I've been having an interesting private conversation with Shaun Horrigan, who agrees with me that Umbrella Man took the throat shot. And we both think that there must have been a homing device that sent the dart exactly where it needed to go.

As you know, the projectile struck JFK in the lower throat, and not for one second do I think it was an accident; a miss. That was the target, and no one has any basis to assume otherwise.

So, not only did it hit the target, but it hit it right in the center. The throat wound was described by several Parkland doctors as being "in the midline." And that includes Malcolm Perry. There's no way anyone could have accomplished that by sighting down an umbrella. Sprague and Cutler said that the dart was like a guided missile. It did not involve any great marksmanship by Umbrella Man.

So, what guided it? It must have been a homing device. But, where was the homing device?

Shaun Horrigan suggested that perhaps his tie was the homing device. And that makes sense because we know that the tie got nicked.

So, I have looked into it, and what I found out is that JFK changed his tie shortly before the motorcade began. He was wearing one tie in Ft. Worth, at his address outside the hotel and at the breakfast they had for him, and also on the plane. But, either on the plane, or after he deboarded, he changed his tie. And that is NOT subject to debate. The White House Historical Association says that he did that. And the two ties had very different outcomes. The first tie, which he put in his jacket pocket, was later give to a family friend, Preston Bruce, by Jackie. The second tie got nicked in the shooting, and it went to the National Archives, which still has it. And they have never displayed it publicly.

But, here is where it gets even weirder: the two ties look about the same. I can't see any visual difference between them. SO, WHY WOULD HE CHANGE FROM ONE TIE TO ANOTHER TIE THAT WAS IDENTICAL OR NEARLY SO?

I don't think that his mind would have been on his tie at all. So, I don't think it was his idea. I think that someone on his staff must have given him a reason why he really should change his tie. And when I say his staff, I mean his Secret Service agents.

So, I am very open to the posssibility that the second tie had the homing device that would guide the dart to his throat. So, I think Shaun Horrigan got it right, that it was the tie.

And to the naysayers, I ask: Why then did he change his tie? You think he got some egg on it at the Ft. Worth breakfast? It's not part of the record, and you can't make it up.

And I find it very strange that he would have two such identical ties. If you look at men's tie racks, no two ties are the same, and that's true of me too, although I hardly ever wear ties any more.

I think we uncovered history today. How many JFKers knew before today that JFK changed his tie between Ft. Worth to Dallas? But, now you know, and you know that the ties were very similar, which makes the whole thing even more suspicious. And remember how it started, with Shaun Horrigan wondering if JFK's tie was the homing device that guided the dart from the umbrella gun to his throat. Good thinking, Shaun.

 I am having trouble buying this. I'm one of those people who thinks that aging only goes in one direction. You've heard of the movie The Curious Case of Benjamin Buttons? Well, this is the curious case of Benjamin Netanyahu.

 They swiftly covered James Bookhout's head when his hat fell off during melee' because he was maquerading as Jack Ruby.