To those who support me that the man who was talking to the cop who was guarding the door appears to be Oswald, think about this: What was Oswald saying to him? He had nothing he could tell the cop about the murder because he didn't know anything. Oswald must have been talking about himself, saying that he was going to leave because they weren't going back to work. And the next thing he did was walk down the steps and walk away- right before the cop's eyes. Apparently, the cop didn't have a problem with it.

So, the whole story that Oswald snuck away is a lie. It is very likely that Oswald told the cop he was leaving.

And the whole "roll call" story is a lie too. There was never a formal roll call. This is from Chat GPT: "There was no formal TSBD roll call. Roy Truly noticed Oswald was absent from the group of warehouse employees gathered or being questioned on the first floor. That observation became the basis for telling Captain Fritz that Oswald was missing."

I think all honest persons will agree that this was no basis to conclude that Oswald was the murderer. And Oswald was not the only employee missing. Charles Givens also wasn't there. He had left. And Frazier said that he after the shooting, he went down to the basement to eat his lunch. And the cop who intereacted with Oswald at the door could have cleared the whole matter up in a jiffy.

It was just minutes before that Truly had brushed off Oswald to Baker. So, why suspect him of murder just because he wasn't observed with other workers a few minutes later?

The story stinks, and you know it. Roy Truly was CIA. The reason he brushed Oswald off to Baker is because they didn't want Oswald to be arrested at the TSBD. They wanted to get him armed and get him into the theater, where hopefully he would die in a shootout with Police. It didn't work out that way, but it almost did. It certainly could have. So, how did they get him armed and into the theater? I can partially explain that, and I will.

 This group is growing leaps and bounds, and I thank all the people who have been supporting me. But, I have also been banning people left and right because I'm not going to debate the JFK assassination with people who support the official story. If that's your spin, just go away. There are plenty of other JFK groups you can join, but you are not welcome here.

Now, I am going to talk about the Dave Wiegman film, which is the one that Congresswoman Luna has been talking about to the Media. Dave Wiegman worked for NBC, and he was in the first camera car, which was 6 vehicles behind the Presidential limo.

The first camera car was a 1964 Chevrolet Impala convertible. So, in November 1963, they had the latest model Chevy Impala., the 1964. It was provided by a Dallas Chevy dealer, Earl Hayes Chevrolet.

We know that he shot 16 mm film that was 24 frames per second, but we don't know the make and model of his camera.

But, I'll point out that there was nothing wrong with cameras then. They didn't shoot blurry footage. They had great film cameras in 1939, which was the year that The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind came out. The Dave Wiegman film is EXTREMELY blurry, and it was deliberately blurred; not while filming, but afterwards.

So, who blurred it? Our government did. I certainly don't think that NBC took it on themselves to blur it. And prior to the age of internet and Youtube, what means did people have to watch the Wiegman film? I honestly don't know.

Congresswoman Luna kept saying that NBC has the Dave Wiegman film that shows Oswald outside. But, the Dave Wiegman film is streaming on Youtube today. So, what's the difference? The difference, I presume, is that she thinks NBC has the Dave Wiegman film unblurred, which we don't have; not on Youtube or anywhere else.

The next thing is to watch at the Dave Wiegman film. There are several postings of it on Youtube. I suggest you watch this one because it is in slow-motion. However, it was put up by the Prayermanites, and I want you to know that I denounce them vociferously because they insist that Oswald WAS in the doorway but not as the Altgens Doorman or even the Wiegman Doorman. Rather, they point to a fictitious figure whom they call Prayer Man, and they say Oswald was him. I tell you that Prayer Man is fictitious, that he was nobody.

The Prayermanites are propagandists. They are noise-makers. Their mission is to make noise to distract from the fact that Oswald was the Altgens Doorman by making a preposterous counter-claim that he was somebody else who wasn't anybody. So, I denounce the Evil Prayermanites, and I ask you to shun them. However, this slow-motion video of the Dave Wiegman film, which they put up, is useful, which is why I am using it.

So, watch this extremely blurry clip from the Dave Wiegman film. What I want you to notice is that Wiegman captured the doorway when his press made the turn from Houston to Elm. At the time, Wiegman was not trying to capture the doorway. He wasn't even thinking about it. He was just riding in the car and capturing the view; whatever was in front of him.

So, his car completed the 120 degree turn from Houston to Elm and then continued down Elm. Then, Wiegman did something very signifcaint: With his camera, he swung around to his right to do a second pan of the doorway. The first pan was just incidental, but the second pan was deliberate. He made the conscious, focused decision to film that doorway a second time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Q88vpIsp4

I'm going to quit now because I want to go about this very slowly. But, I leave you with a question: Why did Wiegman shoot the doorway a second time? The answer is that he must have seen something through the corner of his eye, or heard something, or both, that propelled him to do it. And we'll talk about that next time.

 Roy Truly was in on the murder of Kennedy and the framing of Oswald. When Officer Marrion Baker (who was not in on anything) stopped Oswald in the lunch room, it was Truly who reassurred him that Oswald worked for him and couldn't be the killer. I'm sure it was the words he said and the way that he said them. Truly must have brushed Oswald off as harmless.

But then, less than half an hour later, Truly went to the Police with the information that Oswald wasn't there for the roll call. And that is insane to jump from him not being present at a roll call to being the murderer. And I'm thinking that Truly must have said more than that. He probably told Police the whole story about Oswald renouncing his American citizenship and living in the Soviet Union and marrying a Soviet woman. He must have said something to that effect because it would be insane to suspect him of murder just because he wasn't present for a roll call.

But, it shows you how corrupt Truly was, that he went from brushing Oswald off as "no way it was him" to 20 minutes later, "issue the BOLO."

 Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna of Florida is the head of the committee Trump appointed to re-examine the JFK assassination. She has been going on television, particularly Fox News, to say that NBC has got the Dave Wiegman film in a condition that shows that Oswald was standing outside during the shooting.

She is certainly right that the Wiegman film shows Oswald standing in the doorway. But, they blurred it to hell in order to obscure him. That NBC still has the unblurred version, I couldn't say. But, this is definitely Oswald in the doorway.

Even when they created the phony footage of Lovelady in a plaid shirt, which involved an imposter, not the real Lovelady, the guy did not have his shirt gaped open like Oswald, and like we see here. The only person the Wiegman Doorman can be is Oswald. And you can plainly see that there was nothing plaid about Oswald's shirt above. It was just a fine grain. It wasn't checkered like the shirt below.

And there is more of great significance about the Wiegman film that I am going to share shortly. It's the Wiegman film that tells us what exactly happened in that doorway.

 That guy at the door talking to the cop is definitely Oswald, and no one should be swayed because the government said it was 1:30 or 2:00 or 2:30, and I've heard all those times. The government lies. It lies all the time. It lies about everything. If you haven't figured that out yet, you're living behind a veil.

The funny thing is that the company line is that that person is a woman. That is ridiculous too. One of the many differences between men and women, in case you don't know, is that men tend to have square, geometric shoulders, whereas women tend to have soft, gently sloping shoulders, which adds to their femininity and charm. That person hsa got the squarest shoulders I've ever seen.

Now, his image is distorted. If you look closely, you can see that his long neck is pixellated. That happens when you enlarge an image excessively. But, his image hasn't been enlarged. He is small in the picture because he is far from the camera. So, there is no excuse for that distortion, and I'm sure it was deliberate.

Just look at the likeness between the shape of the head, the lay of the hair, the length of the neck, the slenderness. What, do you think that we live in a world of coincidences? That is not Billy Lovelady, by the way. Lovelady was inside the building at the time. So, you think there was another guy besides him who looked and dressed like Oswald? No, no, no. The likeness that we see is due to the fact that that is Oswald.

The Dallas Police were inspecting the box cars even beforre the motorcade arrived. James Jarman said that when he and Harold Norman walked down Houston Street to reach the back door of the building, that they saw police swarming the box cars in the railway yard. That was at 12:20. So, Dallas Police having custody of these three tramps at 12:34 is not a stretch.

He does look eerily like Oswald. There were only 33 employees at the TSBD. That guy had to be one of them. Why else would he be up there? So, anyone who wants to fight this needs to get the list of 33 employees and go through it. See if you can find another employee who looked like him. There was only one: Lee Harvey Oswald.

Who are you going to believe? Officialdom, or your own eyes?

 Some people want to play hardball over when the Three Tramps were paraded at the top of Dealey Plaza. One guy said it was 1:30. Oh really? Well, one search engine said this: The Three Tramp photos were taken between 2:20 and 2:30 PM on November 22, 1963.  I asked Chat GPT, and it said that there is a discrepancy, that the Portal of Texas History says 2 pm, but the Sixth Floor Museum says 2:30. Why am I not surprised.

I tell you that there is a clock in the photo that was taken in front of the Texas Book Despository, and that clock is Lee Harvey Oswald, who is in the photo. If you look closely at the man talking to the Police Officer, you can see on his left wrist the ID bracelet that Oswald wore. That is Lee Harvey Oswald, and that means the photo was taken at 12:33 or 12:34. Oswald in the photo trumps all the lies. And there is nothing more lied about than the JFK assassination.

 I shall continue with what happened after Oswald got to the doorway. Of course, he went from the doorway to the 2nd floor lunch room, and I want to discuss how and why that happened. But first, it's unfortunate that many people deny that it happened. They think it's a fabrication, a lie, and that is ridiculous because Baker said it, Truly said it, and Oswald said it. It's in the Fritz Notes that Oswald said it. So, how could they all say it if it wasn't true? It's not like Baker, Truly, and Oswald had the opportunity to conspire together to tell a lie. In fact, even just Baker and Truly could not have conspired together to lie. They didn't know each other. They didn't refer to each other by name. It was the superintendent and the officer.

It takes a lot of trust to conspire to lie with someone. Strangers don't do that. And they were strangers.

And if Oswald didn't go to the lunchroom and back, where was he for about 3 minutes? We know he was in the doorway, and I am going to discuss exactly when he left the doorway for the lunch room. But, guess what he did after going to the lunch room? He returned to the doorway,. And we have a second image of Oswald in the doorway. It's in one of the Three Tramps photos. This is Oswald, back in the doorway, 3 minutes after the first time he was captured in the doorway.

So, we know what happened. Oswald went to the lunchroom, where he had his encounter with Baker and Truly. Then he walked back down to the doorway, taking the same route he took to reach it; he walked through the office area on the 2nd floor and then down the elegant stairs in the southeast corner of the building.

And when he got back to the 1st floor, he had an encounter with Robert MacNeil, the Candian journalist who eventually became an anchor on PBS News. MacNeil asked Oswald where the pay phone was, and Oswald told him. After that, Oswald exited the building, and that is when he was captured in the Three Tramps photo.

So, it's Oswald in the upper right corner. They distorted his image. You can see how pixelated it looks, and there's no valid reason for that. Another way they cope with is to mostly crop Oswald out of it. But, it is definitely Oswald. And that means that that photo had to have been taken in the 12:33 to 12:34 window.

I know that, officially, all the Backyard photos were taken after 2 pm, but no, this photo was taken betwen 12:33 and 12:34. And the Dallas Police were manning the freight cars looking for suspicious charact ers even before the motorcade.

And let's consider the story of that photo. You see Oswald talking to a Dallas cop. But, who started the conversation? Oswald did. How do I know? It's because the officer is mostly facing straight at the doorway, while Oswald is facing the officer squarely. So, Oswald walked up to the officer, not vice versa.

What was Oswald saying to him? I can only speculate. Perhaps he was explaining why he was leaving; that it didn't look like they were going to resume working that day, so he was going to go home. I'm not even going to try to conjure up a response for the officer. The officer may have been Dallas Police Inspector J. Herbert Sawyer. Of course, he never admitted to talking to Oswald, but by the time he testified, he certainly knew what was expected of him.

And it was right after that that Oswald left Dealey Plaza on his trek back to his boarding house. Some people deny that he went there too, although he certainly did.

So, for years, I have shown you images of Oswald in the doorway during the assassination (Altgens and Wiegman) and now I have shown you an image of Oswald in the doorway a few minutes after that. Next time, I'll tell you what happened in the time between the two images.