You see that, bpete. Your homey Clark Rob says it wasn't Oswald's rifle. You know what that means? It means that Oswald never had the rifle up against his shirt. He never handled the rifle, and therefore at no time did any fibers from any shirt of his get on the butt of that rifle.
Now you can take the butt of that rifle and shove it the same place Joseph Backes shoves his proscenium arches because you're just as stupid as he is.
How many researchers are talking about Oswald having worn his arrest shirt on a previous day and gotten fibers on it from having handled the rifle which lingered until the day they tested it? Well, let's check on Education Forum. Looks to me like the answer is: none.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=18218
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.