Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Exactly, Backes. Therefore, where did this shit come from?

It was shit when it was uploaded to Youtube. You said so yourself. So, where did the shit come from?

Because, it's very different from this:

So, what do you figure, Backes? Do you think that one of the cameramen had his equipment focused properly so that it produced a clear picture while another had his settings so far off that it resulted in crap? Is that what you think? Because they both exist, Backes, and there has to be an explanation. 

Youtube has nothing to do with it, and you've admitted that. It all has to do with the quality of the image being uploaded. So, why the vast difference in quality of the same image? And if you want to say they were different images of the same scene taken by different cameramen, I still ask: why the vast difference? Because they were all professionals, Backes. There is no reason to think that some cameraman there would have produced footage as shitty as this:

So, go back to your statement and explain what happened in light of it. It was a shitty image when it was uploaded to Youtube. So, why was it such a shitty image? Who took such a shitty image?