Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Unfortunate? True, but not for me. And I assure you that I have never maintained that Lovelady was Oswald. 

But, let's think about what it means if Prayer Man was Oswald. It means that Oswald was framed. It means that the Dallas Police and the FBI set him up. It means that any and all hope of depicting law enforcement as innocent that day and thereafter are forever dashed.  
If Oswald was Prayer Man, how could the rifle have been his? How could he have brought it to work? Why would he have brought it to work? Is the punk going to argue that it was Oswald's rifle and he did bring it to work but he decided at the last minute not to use it? How likely is that? Is he going to argue that somebody told Oswald to bring it to work so that he could be framed? In that case, why didn't Oswald explain what happened? "So and so told me to bring my rifle to work."   

If Oswald was Prayer Man and since Kennedy was indeed shot, it means that somebody else had to do it. And is there any reason to retain the Single Bullet Theory without Oswald? Why would they frame Oswald to protect another lone gunman? Why not just go after him? Obviously, there HAD to be a conspiracy if they framed Oswald at all. Is someone going to argue that there were no bad intentions, that law enforcement just got it wrong that day in blaming Oswald and thinking that he alone did it? Then how could they keep getting it wrong for 51 years? 

If Oswald was Prayer Man then it means that Warren Report defenders such as Vince Bugliosi, Gerald Posner, John McAdams, Max Holland, etc. are utterly and completely wrong and are either evil con-men or stupid shills and need to be denounced rapidly.   

If Oswald was Prayer Man, then how did fibers from his shirt get on the butt of the rifle? Once you admit that Oswald was in the doorway, don't you have to give up the rifle? 

If Oswald was Prayer Man, then he was innocent of shooting Kennedy, so why on Earth would he have shot Tippit? Shall we all sink into the stupidity of Anthony Marsh?

If Oswald was Prayer Man, then obviously the Warren Report was completely wrong, so who was the Warren Commission protecting in coming up with all their crap?

If Oswald was Prayer Man, then why did Buell Frazier, in denying that Oswald was Doorman, not add that Oswald was a just a little further west on the landing? Didn't he see him? And why didn't Lovelady? And why didn't Shelley? They were all asked. Did they all just innocently fail to notice Oswald there, even though he remained there until Baker arrived?  Doesn't it make them all liars if Oswald was Prayer Man? 

And to those who think that Doorman was Lovelady, then there was nobody between Lovelady and Oswald on that landing if Oswald was Prayer Man. So, how could Lovelady, in particular, notice him? Why did Lovelady specifically say that he didn't see Oswald again that day from the time they broke for lunch at 11:45? 

And remember that the action was to the west which was to Doorman's right, so he had to have been turned in the direction that Prayer Man was. So, how could Lovelady not have seen Oswald if Oswald was Prayer Man?   

If Oswald was Prayer Man then how did Howard Brennan identify Oswald as the man in the 6th floor window? Doesn't it mean that they must have had an Oswald double up there at the window? Or do you think the real lone gunman just happened to look like Oswald by coincidence? 

If Oswald was Prayer Man doesn't it destroy just about every claim of the official story? 

For someone in your position, punk, isn't it rather unthinking and stupid of you to grant any plausibility whatsoever to the Prayer Man hypothesis? 

I know you're wanting to make a coalition with anyone who is anti-Cinque, whether they are lone-nut or CT, but don't you think you pushed it too far this time? Your hypocrisy and deceitfulness are showing.