Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpunk posted this:

Thanks for pointing out how meaningless the Dislikes are, punk, issued by people who haven't even watched the video. 

And you are not only juvenile, as I have said before many times, but you are also incredibly stupid for someone who is so juvenile. 

How would anyone know? (In this context, it is definitely one word, you illiterate moron.) Well, I would know because I would be the one deleting the negative comments. Furthermore, I already said that I would leave up any negative contents that were specific and substantive, and there haven't been any. Further-erther-more, (to coin a term), one can easily do a screen-save of any frame from the video to attack elsewhere, such as on your page. But, you haven't done that, and nobody else has either. 

In fact, why hasn't there been a whole new site started to debunk Ralph Cinque's JFK in 3 Minutes video, frame by frame? Let's duke it out, claim by claim. I'm ready. 

Take the first frame that follows the cover collage of JFK and Oswald. It's this one, which was described by Judyth Baker as the "definitive" comparison, which generated a torrent of Likes. 

How likely is it that that much matching, in the man and the clothing, could have occurred that day between Oswald and Lovelady? And let's remember that at the time, Lovelady, who was shorter, weighed at least 170 pounds, and Oswald, who was taller, weighed 131. Look at how those right collars are a perfect, spot-on match. Look how sunken the t-shirt is on both- something that was never true on Lovelady at any time in his life, even when he was posing as Doorman. You can even see how well the right ears match. Of course, the left ear of Doorman is all deformed, but that's another story. But still, he can only be Oswald and certainly not Lovelady.  Yes, it's definitive. It's also very powerful. And you are a stupid mother pluck.