What's wrong with this picture of the Marguerite Oswald of fame? And I mean besides the fact that she's at home, and she's got a small framed picture of herself on a shelf.
Are you ready? Do you need more time? Take all the time you need. Study it closely.
Well, did you figure it out? I hope so. If not, I shall now tell you:
She has got a framed picture of Lee on the shelf, and when I say "Lee" I mean "Lee" as in the "Lee" of John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee.
It's not a baby picture of her son. She didn't actually have a son, as far as we know. But, she had, in effect, an adopted son who was the Lee Harvey Oswald of fame. But, that's not him as a baby. That's the other Oswald as a baby.
So, how did she get that picture? Did Robert Oswald give it to her? If so, when? Don't you think a mother would be able to recognize her own child and be able to distinguish him from all others?
The picture of her collusion with Robert Oswald to fake her identity as his mother and that of his brother Lee is getting uglier and uglier, and I have a feeling that there is more ugly to come as we uncover more.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.