Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Брайан Энтони Steve, I'm being purely objective here, and on this one topic only. The physiognomy of the face on these two photos are different. Yes, the angle and times are different, but, setting aside the brow ridge, the nose, the cheek bones and the forehead there is one inescapable difference. No two ears are alike....and these two most definitely are not.

9 hrs · Like

This is a guy whom I call Alias Man because I don't know who he is, but he made this comment about Gorilla Man not possibly being Billy Lovelady. But, I want him and others to think about the implications of it. If Gorilla Man is not Lovelady, then it means they, the conspirators, tried to foist a phony Lovelady on the public and into the story. Why would they do that? There can only be one reason. It's because Gorilla Man is wearing a plaid shirt, a long-sleeved plaid shirt. And really, the long sleeves are the thing because Doorman's shirt isn't plaid, but it is long-sleeved. But, after the fiasco of the FBI admitting that Lovelady said he wore a short-sleeved striped shirt and photographing him in it, they knew they needed to do more than flap their lips. They knew they had to come up with a visual. They didn't have one, so they went into the movie business to make one. And there first, though not their last, take on it was Gorilla Man. So, if it's a lie that Gorilla Man was Lovelady, then it also has to be a lie that Lovelady was Doorman. One follows from the other like night follows day. Just the fact that they would resort to subterfuge tells you that they were lying about the central issue of who was Doorman. And, Doorman was, of course, and by necessity, Lee Harvey Oswald.