I'm not talking about that other version, Backass. I am talking about the Groden scan that Robert Unger put up:
What is it that we're seeing there, Backes? It doesn't matter that you don't see it in the other one because we see it in this one. And this one is much more widely circulated.
What is it? Why is it there? Why is it so much different than the other one? It needs to be explained, Backes. You, being soaked in blood, don't care, but I do. Any honest person would. But, you are so filthily corrupt that the truth means nothing to you. You would destroy evidence if it conflicted with your established paradigm. That's how corrupt and wicked you are.
Why does this look the way it does? Count your blue and your red here:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.