Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

tims...@gmail.com

Jul 27 (8 hours ago)

On Monday, 27 July 2015 12:23:37 UTC+10, Ralph Cinque  wrote:
> Brennan, lip-flapping is like hen-pecking. It goes on. It makes a lot of
> noise. But not a whole lot gets accomplished.
>
> But, if you want to claim that Mary Moorman was turned towards Kennedy at
> the time of the Moorman photo, you have to post such an image of her.
>
> It just so happens I have done that. The Moorman photo was taken at Z-315
> in the Zapruder film. Your old pal Vince Bugliosi said so, and I presume
> that's good enough for you.
>
> But, it turns out that MM was NOT turned towards the Kennedys at that
> time. Look and learn:
>
> http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2015/07/this-is-frame-of-z-315-that-robin-unger.html

Coupla things here, Ralph. First, if you use the Costella Combined Edit of
the Z film frames it shows that Mary Moorman first appears at frame 290,
not 292 as you and your physics expert claim:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

Second, throughout the entirety of her appearance, Mary Moorman appears to
be tracking the figues of JFK and Jackie through the viewfinder of her
camera, preparing to take a photo of them. Just click the frames in order,
Cinque. It's really not that hard.

Third, here is a PRIME example of Mary Moorman NOT turned towards the
Kennedys, according to YOU, as she is preparing to take a photo of them,
Cinque:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z298.jpg

She's pointing her camera right AT them, Cinque! She is facing them!

Here is ANOTHER prime example of Mary Moorman NOT facing towards the
Kennedys as she is about to take a photo of them, according to Ralph
Cinque:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z300.jpg

She is pointing her camera right AT them Cinque! At the Kennedys! About to
take a photo!

Do you and the physics expert even KNOW where to find Mary Moorman in the
Zapruder film, Cinque?

It sure doesn't look like it to me.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia 

Ralph Cinque:

No, Brennan. You are so unequipped and unprepared to deal with this that it's like lions and lambs, and I shouldn't have to tell you who the lion is here.

First, look at the numbers put up. You put up Z-298 and Z-300. I've been saying all along that the tracking is fine up to 300. After that, starting with 301, Mary Moorman is not pointing her camera at the Kennedys, but rather remains frozen in the same position she was in 300. And that's the problem. That's where the lack of tracking comes in. 

I usually speak of 292 because you can't see her camera in 290, and 291 is rather blurry. But, w could go with 291. So, let's make it 291. Happy?

So, from 291 to 300, she is trained on the Kennedys, and I have no doubt that she took her picture somewhere in there. And it makes sense that she would because it's much better to catch someone's face in a picture rather than the back of his head. The idea that she would have stood there since 10  AM to do this, only to have him ride by, ever so slowly, with her all ready to take his picture, and then she lets him pass by her before actually hitting the shutter and without even aiming her camera at him properly is quite preposterous.  

Here is Z-309 as an example of a completely dissociated frame. This is the Bizarro world of JFK. 

You can make excuses for this but not without spreading a lot of blood around.