 |
I think the evidence and corroborated testimony would have destroyed
Oswald in a courtroom setting in a trial that probably wouldn't have
lasted one week.
The fact that President Kennedy was shot from the 6th floor of Oswald's
place of employment, by a weapon that belonged to Oswald that had Oswald's
prints on it, from a sniper's nest that had Oswald's prints all around it,
and the gunman was seen by a witness who gave a description of an
individual looking like Oswald ... would beg the question: If that wasn't
Oswald shooting from that location - then who could it possibly have been?
Then you couple Oswald's consciousness-of-guilt behavior to the above
evidence and it's - game, set, match!
He left work immediately. He kills a police officer. He resists arrest. He
is uncooperative when asked about the fake "Alek Hidell" fake ID. Then he
tells provable lies. He claims he has never owned a rifle. He claims he
was on the 1st floor lunchroom with "Junior". He claims to have never seen
a photograph of him holding a rifle and that it is probably fake.
If Oswald was in the doorway - then why didn't he tell Capt. Fritz that he
was in the doorway?
If Oswald was being framed for the shooting, ostensibly by a group of very
sophisticated conspirators - how could the architects of this complex
conspiracy leave it to chance that Oswald would be seen during the
shooting, innocently standing there?
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Oswald in a courtroom setting in a trial that probably wouldn't have
lasted one week.
The fact that President Kennedy was shot from the 6th floor of Oswald's
place of employment, by a weapon that belonged to Oswald that had Oswald's
prints on it, from a sniper's nest that had Oswald's prints all around it,
and the gunman was seen by a witness who gave a description of an
individual looking like Oswald ... would beg the question: If that wasn't
Oswald shooting from that location - then who could it possibly have been?
Then you couple Oswald's consciousness-of-guilt behavior to the above
evidence and it's - game, set, match!
He left work immediately. He kills a police officer. He resists arrest. He
is uncooperative when asked about the fake "Alek Hidell" fake ID. Then he
tells provable lies. He claims he has never owned a rifle. He claims he
was on the 1st floor lunchroom with "Junior". He claims to have never seen
a photograph of him holding a rifle and that it is probably fake.
If Oswald was in the doorway - then why didn't he tell Capt. Fritz that he
was in the doorway?
If Oswald was being framed for the shooting, ostensibly by a group of very
sophisticated conspirators - how could the architects of this complex
conspiracy leave it to chance that Oswald would be seen during the
shooting, innocently standing there?
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Ralph Cinque:
You know, Emerling, in court, you wouldn't get to say those things unchallenged and uncontested. The fact is that President Kennedy was shot from multiple locations, and most ballistic experts don't think any of the known shots came from the 6th floor window of the TSBD. You saying it doesn't make it so, and it doesn't make it legal currency for you to spend.
And, the rifle did NOT have Oswald's fingerprints on it. His palm print was found only after he was dead, with all that that implies. No nitrates were found on his face, which is inexplicable if he shot that rifle.
And haven't you heard? Oswald denied owning that rifle or any rifle, and there is proof that he didn't. Listen to Jesus:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15318
And there was definitely someone in the Sniper's Nest, and that person may have resembled Oswald. But, he wasn't Oswald because Oswald was in the doorway at the time; and we have images that would be submitted as evidence in court, and they would hold up. The jury would see that it was him.
And nobody reported seeing the person at the 6th floor window shooting. Again: there is no ballistic evidence and no other evidence that any of the known shots came from the 6th floor.
And Oswald showed no consciousness of guilt. He didn't leave work immediately. He was in no hurry to leave. He gave two people directions to the pay phone. It appears that he even talked to a police officer before he left. He offered to let an older woman have his cab. Where's the consciousness of guilt?
He kills a police officer? You figure you just have the right to assume that one too, to play it like a card, do you? Nobody even reported any stink from his revolver. Nor did anyone report finding gunshot residue in the chambers of it. We have a witness, Butch Burroughs, the popcorn man at the theater who sold popcorn to Oswald, who placed Oswald in the theater at 1:07. Tippit wasn't killed until 1:15.
And the problems with the rifle are much greater for you than they are for Oswald. If he stored it at Ruth Paine's house, without her knowing it, how did he move it in and out of there for all those supposed practice sessions at the Sports Drome Firing Range? And if he kept it in his room for any amount of time, don't you think his landlady, who cleaned his room, would know it. 17 people lived there, so don't you think somebody would have seen him with it? And since his last supposed practice sesssion was on February 17, and he didn't go to Irving between the 17th and 21st, how did it wind up in Ruth Paine's garage?
And no, Emerling. Oswald did not claim that he was on the first floor with "Junior" during the shooting, and "Junior" wasn't on the first floor during the shooting. "Junior" was at the 5th floor window below the Sniper's Nest during the shooting. Oswald's encounter with "Junior" came earlier than 12:30, and by 12:30, Oswald was "out with Bill Shelley in front" in the doorway. And we have two images of him there: from the Altgens photo and the Wiegman film which include the identification of his shirt and his t-shirt. We also have the original testimony of Carolyn Arnold who said that she saw him between the double doors (at the doorway) after she had gone outside.
And yes, the Backyard photos were faked. The man in the picture was shorter than Oswald and was probably Roscoe White, who had an anvil-like chin like the man in the picture. They superimposed Oswald's face (but not his chin) over the body of the other man. See the work of Jack White.
Oswald DID tell Fritz that he was in the doorway. This is 2015, Emerling, and if the words "out with Bill Shelley in front" don't mean anything to you by this late date, then you should get the hell off the case.
And as to why the conspirators allowed Oswald to go outside during the shooting only to be photographed, how were they supposed to prevent it? By ordering him not to go out? By giving him a reason why he shouldn't go out? Such as what? And no matter what they told him, he could then repeat it to police. "So and so told me not to go outside." That wouldn't look good. The police would want to talk to that person, don't you think? That person would then become a "person of interest" don't you think? So, they took a chance on that. They took a chance on a lot of things. It was a very brazen act on the part of Bush and company, and you could even say reckless. What they were counting on was a compliant news media and a cooperative successor to JFK. That's what gave them their confidence.
The photographic evidence alone is conclusive that Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting, including his facial features, his build, his stance, and most important, his clothes, his very unique clothes, including a deformed t-shirt which he himself deformed through habit. It is Lee Harvey Oswald in the doorway, and it can't be denied. And it would hold up in court. It would win the case for him.
So you're wrong, Emerling. Deluded and wrong. And by the way, I'm making you famous.
Ralph Cinque
Buda, TX
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.