Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No, Unger. Lance is being stupid. It's shades of this crap, where he's got Doorman's shoulders leaning sharply while his head remains vertical. When you lean, you lean with your whole spine. You don't do anything with your shoulders; they just go along for the ride. And the spinal leaning takes the head along too since the neck is part of the spine. It doesn't leave the head behind. This is gargoyle stuff here: 

Now, in this Moorman case, Lance's diagram is all wrong, and you can tell at first glance that it is wrong. Look where JFK is. I have it circled.

Both Mary Moorman and Babushka Lady were trying to shoot the President, right? So, each of them would point her camera at him. So, Babushka Lady was certainly turned towards Kennedy and shooting at a sharp angle compared to Mary Moorman. 

That is when the Moorman photo was taken by BL, but Mary had already taken her picture. And why would Mary Moorman, who was poised and ready to shoot from the moment the limo appeared at the top of the hill, let Kennedy reach her and pass her without taking his picture? No one would do that. And when I say no one, I mean nobody.

The mistake that Jack White's team made was, first of all, fussing about Mary being in the street. She wasn't in the street. It would have been extremely brazen for her to do that, and she wasn't a brazen person. She wasn't a paparazzo, and she wasn't a professional photo-journalist. Of course, she stayed on the grass, and it's a darn shame anyone ever doubted it. 

But, the second mistake they made was to accept that the Moorman photo was taken from Mary's location and from her angle. It was taken from farther east, and it was taken at a steeper angle. 

Notice that the recreation shot was less angular. The photographer was not turned as much. By being turned, the taker of the Moorman photo captured a shot in which the right side of the picture was more compressed, and the left side was more expanded, opened up. She was turned left, so it opened up the left side of her picture. I circled the end of the wall in each picture, and you see that it was farther to the left in the recreation and shifted right in the Moorman photo. Also, I drew a line that is perpendicular to the steps, and there is a much greater expanse in the Moorman photo than in the recreation. 

So, the truth is that the recreation wasn't close to duplicating the Moorman photo because the photographer was in the wrong spot and shooting from the wrong angle. 

Jack White and his team did not consider that the Moorman photo was not taken by Mary Moorman, and that was their biggest mistake. 

If you compare them again, you can see that if you just move yourself farther up the street (to the east) and increase the angle by turning yourself to your left (to the west), you'll get the right perspective. 

The Moorman photo was not originally a Polaroid. They took a Polaroid of Babushka Lady's picture, but first, they undoubtedly cropped it. 

And, Babushka Lady undoubtedly captured Hargis and Martin from her perspective.

So, they had to get rid of Martin and his motorcycle. You can plainly see that the tool box behind Hargis is much deeper in the picture than the front wheel of the motorcycle, which was Martin's. In fact, I'll dumb it down for you.

 You see the two arrows, right? You see the difference in the length of those arrows? The short arrow means the object was shallow. The long arrow means the object was deep. The tool box was deeper than the front wheel, and that's because it was the front wheel of Martin's bike and the tool box of Hargis' bike, which was deeper. 

Now, when I go to Dallas to prove that this capture of BJ Martin was impossible:

I am definitely going to shoot from Mary's position and not Babushka Lady's. That's because they are claiming that Mary Moorman took the photo. 

So, I shall stand in Mary's location on Elm St., which was a yard or two east of Zapruder's location on the pedestal. 

But, it's not going to duplicate the parameters of the Moorman photo exactly because that's impossible, as it's not the location from which it was taken nor will the angle be the same. The Moorman photo was taken at a steep angle, as the physics professor showed us scientifically and mathematically. But regardless, I will prove that the capture of BJ Martin's right arm alone was impossible by anyone from that side of the street. You can't not photograph something that is in your visual field.