Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

To rebut Hondo, I will post my view stats for my blog.

That's not bad. It's been higher, but it's also been lower. It's about average. And it's much higher than any of the Facebook pages. 

But, Hondo is really being ridiculous. He assumes that just because he can take Jack Ruby out of the Altgens photo with the greatest of ease today using Photoshop or similar software, that they could do it in 1963. Talk about a misrepresentation. 

But, Hondo is thoroughly deluded because his problems in defending the women and children in Altgens and Towner are much greater than any problems I have. In one, the child is an infant in swaddling cothes, and in the other the child is a little boy in a denim jacket.  In one, the woman's clothes are white or at least light, and in the other, her clothes are black. In one, the woman's hair is pulled back; in the other, her hair is draping her shoulders. In the one with the infant, the head is way too small in proportion to the body. In that one, the mother is holding the infant but without doing so with her arms, since her left arm is waving at the President constantly, and her right arm is missing from action. In the one with the boy, he is standing erect, definitely standing upright and not being held, and yet, there is nothing he could have been standing on. In fact, he couldn't have stood that straight on anything except solid ground because he wouldn't. And that's because one can easily fall off of any perch except solid ground, and that affects the way you stand.

Making these two sets of Madonna and Child equal each other is an impossible task. You lost before you even got started, Hondo. You're just too stupid to know it.