The idiot actually thinks that because the image of Prayer Man is highly blurred, we should use similarly blurred images of Oswald with which to compare.
It's about information, Backes. It's about data. And the more data you have the better.
It's one thing to use a blurred image when that's all you have. But, to use a blurred image when you have better images is just plain stupid.
Why would you use the former when you could use the latter? Although, there is nothing about either one that suggests that he's Prayer Man.
If you blur up Oswald's image enough, you could probably say he was a match to Queen Elizabeth if she's equally as blurred.
The really ridiculous thing is that Backes doesn't really care about defending Prayer Man. He just knows that his friends support it and it's anti-Cinque. If he really believed it, don't you think he would have announced it on his (In)Justice for Kennedy blog?
Oswald's location during the assassination found
Finally, after 52 years, we have discovered Oswald's location during the shooting. He was standing in the doorway and can be seen as Prayer Man in the Darnell clip. It's a very blurry, low-detail image, but if you make a similarly compromised image of Oswald, they kinda/sorta look alike. It works for me. It speaks to me.
Backes has never put up anything like that. So, why is he defending it here?
He is just arguing for the sake of arguing. He doesn't believe what he's saying. He doesn't care about Prayer Man. He couldn't care less. He's really not interested. It's the war he's interested in. The war against me is the only thing that drives him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.