Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Ralph Cinque:

Anthony Marsh

10:13 AM (1 hour ago)

On 10/29/2015 2:00 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> This is my response to Marsh.
>
> http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2015/10/anthony-marsh-oct-26-on-10252015-1033.html
>

Of course you are not brave enough to post that text here:

  Ralph Cinque:

I get it, Marsh. Now you're making it that Oswald was so paranoid that a
cop only had to blink at him, and he would open fire. But, what is that
based on? What is there in the record, and I mean the real record not the
lore they created about him that justifies that view of him? What is the
real evidence that he was paranoid? And what is the evidence that he
disliked cops?

Well, here is, apparently, an image of Oswald talking to a cop scant
minutes after the assassination:



Tippit did not wink. He talked to Oswald through the open window and then
started to get out of the police car to confront Oswald. He may already
have had his service revolver drawn by the time he got to the front of the
police car. He didn't just let Oswald go on his way.

FYI, Oswald pulled out his revolver and showed it to the KGB officers at
the Soviet embassy in Mexico City, telling them that he always carried it
because he was afraid that the authorities were out to get him. He did not
single out the DPD over the Sheriff's Department.

BTW, your photo is phony as usual. That is not Oswald. He was paranoid
because the government was opening his mail and trying to get him fired
and harassing him, questioning his wife. 

Ralph Cinque:

Brave enough? There are images in the article which I couldn't post here. Am I brave enough? Are you completely out of your mind? 

It's not a rhetorical question, Marsh. How can you possibly claim to divine all that about the Tippit shooting? What witness claimed to see Tippit draw his gun?   

For your information, Oswald didn't go to Mexico City. There is not a stitch of evidence that he did, and several images of impostors are part of the official record. Oswald repeatedly denied going to Mexico City, and he had no reason to lie about it because it wasn't a crime to go there, and he wasn't being accused of committing any crimes there. So, why would he lie about it?

And if my photo is phony I'm not the one who phonied it. And, why would they make a phony photo of Oswald with the Three Tramps?

You are completely hapless, Marsh, and you are the only person I know who disputes the official story but keeps Oswald as a maniacal killer.