Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It turns out that they really are sunglasses on the Ruby impostor. And I'm not the one who found out. My mystery friend, who has been helping me all along, he saw it and alerted me. And no, Backes: I don't mean Larry Rivera. Larry has done colossal work, but he's not the one I am referring to. You don't know this other guy, and you can't figure out who he is. 

Can you, or can you not, see that he is wearing sunglasses? 

You can see the frame of the glasses, and you can see the arm or "temple" of the glasses going back to his ear. Here is the link so that you can see it in the film. It's in the CNN version of the Oswald shooting, and it occurs at the 14 second mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6PcVCqg3tg

So, does that settle it? Or does anyone besides Joseph Backes want to keep arguing about it?

OK, so he was wearing sunglasses, which means he's not Jack Ruby since Ruby didn't have sunglasses. And he's not the garage shooter either because the garage shooter had regular glasses.

Those are clear glasses in his pocket, not sunglasses.

So, this guy below was not Jack Ruby, though they've been lying about it for decades. But really, it's just one teensy-weensy lie in the cavalcade of lies that is the official story of the Oswald assassination. But, why would they need such a lie if Ruby was really there?