Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

How can this possibly be Bookhout when the ears don't match and the nose doesn't match?

I said: How can this possibly be Bookhout when the ears don't match and the nose doesn't match? Do you think you get to just ignore things at will? And isn't it obvious that the man on the right doesn't have eyebrows like the man on the left? And that no man on Earth has eyebrows like the man on the left? And that means that the eyebrows on the left are false. Therefore, the primary image of James Bookhout from before the JFK assassination, which required going back to 1937, just happens to be an altered and deliberately falsified image.  

My suspicion of James Bookhout being the Garage Shooter arose from realizing that OSWALD KNEW THE SHOOTER. This is not the glance of a stranger.

So, I asked myself: WHO COULD OSWALD HAVE KNOWN? In that situation, it could only be someone from law enforcement, which means a DPD detective or FBI agent. I BEGAN TO SUSPECT JAMES BOOKHOUT PRECISELY BECAUSE NO IMAGE OF HIM COULD BE FOUND. And then when I read his alibi for not attending the jail transfer, I found it had no credibility. And then when I found out that he attended all the Oswald interrogations, I realized that James Bookhout spent more time with Oswald than anybody. 

But obviously, all of it was completely moot until I found an image of Bookhout. He was either compatible with the Garage Shooter or he wasn't. And I do want to stress that it was I who found the yearbook images of Bookhout. And until I did, there were no images of him whatsoever.  

So, when I finally discovered this image and recognized immediately from the phony eyebrows that it was altered, I realized that a devious and malicious cover-up was going on concerning Bookhout's looks. 

 So, let's look at the comparison to the newly found 1968 photo again, and remember that we already know that the 1937 image was altered because it is not possible that James Bookhout had those eyebrows. 

If the starting image was altered, and it was, how likely is it that the matching image is also altered? Extremely likely. Granted, those hairlines look similar, but how likely is it that a 23 year old man who was already showing signs of significant recession had the same hairline at age 67? Extremely unlikely. If you look at the lips on the right, they don't even look photographic. They look like stripes from a felt pen. So, there is dissimilarity with the ears, nose, mouth, and eyebrows. What matches? Only one thing: the puffiness of the face. Young Bookhout has puffy, bulging cheeks, and so does the man on the right. But, it was precisely to match those bulging cheeks on the left that the image on the right was manipulated as we see. But, when could that have been done? I'm the one who brought the image on the left into the light; into awareness. I discovered it. It didn't exist in the discussion before that. It would have been pointless to do it before that. You can't match something unless the other thing is present. So, the image on the right must have been altered after I bought out the image on the left. I'll say it again: The image on the right must have been altered after I brought attention to the image on the left. It was about a year ago that I discovered the image on the left. But, if they altered the image on the right to match it, why would they wait to bring it out? They wouldn't. They couldn't. They didn't. Therefore, the image on the right must have been altered very recently. 

So, what this shows is that photographic altering for the 1963 JFK assassination is going on in 2017. And that's a chilling thought. They are working the JFK cover-up and re-working the JFK lie as earnestly and aggressively today as ever before. And what I keep wondering is: will they kill again?