 |
No, you don't get it, Von Pein. Why wouldn't Jim Bookhout straighten me
out about the short shooter by the elevator with the detectives not being
his father? Some have suggested that he might sue me, but how? How can he
sue me if he hasn't even ordered me to cease and desist? His silence does
speak volumes. He is refusing to confirm the recent claims of new images
of his father. And he is refusing to denounce my claims. Why wouldn't he
if my claims are false? The only reason he wouldn't is because my claims
are true.
And I sent him a lot more than $25. (response to Pink O'Blazney who suggested that I sent Jim Bookhout's charity $25)
out about the short shooter by the elevator with the detectives not being
his father? Some have suggested that he might sue me, but how? How can he
sue me if he hasn't even ordered me to cease and desist? His silence does
speak volumes. He is refusing to confirm the recent claims of new images
of his father. And he is refusing to denounce my claims. Why wouldn't he
if my claims are false? The only reason he wouldn't is because my claims
are true.
And I sent him a lot more than $25. (response to Pink O'Blazney who suggested that I sent Jim Bookhout's charity $25)
Now, here is David Von Pein's reply, and I want you to notice that he didn't reply at all. He just blathered.
 |
- show quoted text -
What is it called when a person is totally oblivious to the fact he is
constantly making a fool out of himself by spouting things that everybody
knows are ridiculous? There's a technical term for that, isn't there?
Maybe we can call it a Ralph-ism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.