Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Anyone who claims that Oswald was innocent. HAS to be a JFK photo-alterationist. That's because Oswald was a JFK photo-alterationist. He was shown the Backyard Photo, and he said it was fake, that he never posed for it. He said that his face was imposed over the body of another man. He said he knew how it was done from having worked in a photo lab, and that he could show them.

Now, you can't assume that Oswald was lying about that. He was being accused of killing the President of the United States and a police officer. So, why the heck would he lie about posing for a photo? That wasn't a crime. And even if you think it looks bad that he was posing with the alleged murder weapon, so what? How hard is it to say, "Yeah, that's me posing with my rifle, but I didn't shoot anybody. Someone must have stolen my rifle, from where it was stored, and done the shooting. I didn't kill anybody." 

How hard is it to say that? It's not hard to say that at all, and it's exactly what you or I would say in that situation. If you knew you were innocent, and Oswald certainly did, you're not going to start lying to the police- about anything- and least of all an innocent, harmless act such as posing for a photo. 

So, if you believe in Oswald's innocence, you have to believe he was telling the truth about that.  

And consider something else: Oswald offered to show them how the image was falsified. Now, if he knew that that it wasn't false, that he did pose, that it was really him, then he wouldn't have offered to show them how a picture of himself wasn't  a picture of himself. If he was going to lie, he would just lie. He wouldn't offer to prove the lie. How can anyone prove a lie?  

If someone showed you a photo of yourself, and you knew it was real, are you going to show them how it was faked? Of course not. And neither would Oswald. Give him some credit. So, we need to believe him. 

And the Backyard photos really are fake. Very cleverly, they installed Oswald's face but not his chin. They left the chin of the original guy who actually posed, and he had an anvil-like chin. 

That is NOT Oswald's chin on the right. It was the other guy's chin.

Notice that Oswald's chin was not only narrower, but it had a dimple. The other didn't. 

And what it means is that criminal photo alteration was being done even BEFORE the assassination, since they had that photo on the day of the assassination. So, if they had the means and the mindset to do photo alteration BEFORE the assassination, you know darn well that they had the means and the mindset to do photo alteration AFTER the assassination. 

And they did a hell of a lot of it. The JFK assassination is the most photographically altered event in the history of Mankind.