Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I have got something now that proves beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt that Jack Ruby was innocent: his shoes. 

Ruby, on the left, in his mug shot, is wearing high rise shoes with a thick waffled sole and a complex pattern. The Shooter on the right is wearing low rise shoes, that were dressier, with a thin sole, and a more subtle pattern. They are definitely and absolutely not the same shoes. Now, Ruby was not issued regulation shoes. His shoes were not confiscated, and we know that because there are no shoes on his property invoice. It includes "1 set underwear" which they added to account for the light/dark socks discrepancy in this collage. But, they overlooked the shoe discrepancy. So, Ruby wore the shoes we see on the left, while Bookhout wore the shoe we see on the right. And that explains the difference.

JACK RUBY WAS INNOCENT! STOP SUPPORTING THE LIE THAT HE SHOT OSWALD! EVERYONE WHO DISPUTES THE OFFICIAL STORY OF THE JFK ASSASSINATION AND DEFENDS OSWALD NEEDS TO START DEFENDING JACK RUBY AS WELL. I MEAN IT. NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE, I AM TALKING TO YOU.