There isn't one bit of writing attributed to Oswald that can be trusted. Some of it is patently bogus. Oswald, obviously, did not write the fail-safe letter to Marina about what to do if he got killed or captured after shooting at Walker. That's because he didn't shoot at Walker, and it was physically impossible for him to do so, since he didn't own a rifle.
And note that that bogus letter started with a plea for her to go to the P.O. Box. Why on Earth would he want her to do that? According to Harry Holmes, the Postal Inspector, the only thing that came to that P.O. Box were Russian and Socialist newspapers. And that was surely a lie. If Oswald was getting Russian and Socialist newspapers, wouldn't his room have been filled with them? Oswald was dirt-poor. You have to pay a subscription fee to get newspapers mailed to you, and you have to pay postage. You think he was doing that when he could barely feed his family?
It's likely that Oswald didn't even have a P.O. Box, which is why they led with it in the fail-safe letter. They were getting him to confirm their phony claim. He didn't need a P.O. Box, and he didn't get one to order the rifle, since he didn't order one. Note that the interrogators did not ask him about the P.O. Box. Nor did they ask him about ordering a rifle. They simply asked him if he owned one, and he said he didn't. So, why didn't they follow-up with, "Look, we tracked your order to Chicago for the rifle, and we know it was delivered to your P.O. Box." Why didn't they checkmate him with that? It's because they knew it was bogus. Even though they supposedly discovered the Chicago connection in the wee hours of Saturday morning and could have told him about it at the first interrogation on Saturday, they didn't say a word. And we didn't hear a word about it until after Oswald was dead.
And when Marina was first asked on Friday afternoon if Oswald owned a rifle, she said that he used to own one (in Russia) but it got sold. Why would she refer to that if she knew he currently owned a rifle? She wouldn't. She couldn't. She didn't. Months later, after she became the Stepford Wife of the FBI, she waxed on and on about Oswald and his rifle and his insane doings with it, but you need to realize that she was MK-ULTRA'd. It was a brainwashing, where through intense indoctrination, hypnosis, and drug-saddling, they got her to spew the narrative they wanted. And that's true pertaining to the rifle, to the trip to Mexico City, and to other things that Oswald did not do.
But, getting back to Harry Holmes, he was the ultimate liar. Besides lying about the P.O. Box, he lied in saying that at the Sunday morning interrogation, Oswald admitted going to Mexico City and waxed on about it at length. Nobody else who claimed to be at that interrogation said any such thing. And Oswald certainly didn't say it. He was asked at the first interrogation if he went to Mexico City, and he said that the only place in Mexico he ever went was Tijuana. And that made sense because he was a Marine stationed in Southern California, and going down to Tijuana is something Marines did when they were on liberty.
So, that story that Holmes told about Oswald waxing on about Mexico City was surely a lie. And for that matter, the whole Sunday interrogation was a lie. They were done talking to Oswald about his life. On Sunday morning, they were involved in getting ready for the spectacle that was to come, and one of the things they did was go to the basement and shoot the Jackson photo in advance. The Jackson Photo was NOT shot during the Garage Spectacle. It was shot beforehand. There is absolutely no correspondence between the Jackson photo and video images from the films of the Oswald shooting. It was taken an hour or so beforehand, and note that there is testimonial evidence that they cleared the basement at 9:45. Dr. Fred Bieberdorf said so. They only allowed reporters and cameramen to reenter the garage about 10 minutes before the shooting.
And then they had the spectacle, which was pure theater. Oswald was not shot in the garage. He was shot afterwards in the jail office.
And here's another interesting tidbit. FBI Agent James Bookhout (who played Ruby during the Spectacle) was asked what was discussed at the final interrogation. He hesitated a moment, and then he said that he didn't know because he got there late, and he didn't want to cause a disturbance, so he just watched it through the glass in the Homicide Bureau. But, he said that afterwards, he asked Fritz if anything important came out, and Fritz said no. Well, don't you think that if Fritz had heard Oswald admit that he went to Mexico City that he would have considered that important?
So, why did Bookhout tell that lie? His story made no sense. Bookhout was the real head of the interrogations, and Fritz did his bidding. The top man wasn't really Fritz; it was Bookhout. So, he surely would have entered the room even if he was late. He told that fake story because he knew very well that there was no interrogation, that neither him nor anyone else had anything truthful to say about it. So, by saying that he wasn't there, it got him off the hook to reveal what Oswald said. Here are the Fritz Notes about the final interrogation.
They are devoid of any content because there was no content. Do you see anything there about Mexico City?
But, getting back to Oswald's writings, besides the totally bogus writings, such as the fail-safe letter to Marina, it may be that some of them did originate with him, but were heavily edited. And I mean edited to make him look bad, including the outlandish spelling errors. It was recently brought to my attention that Oswald spelled Moscow "Moccow" in one of those letters. And this person pointed out that in the Cyrillic alphabet, the letter "c" represents the sound of our "s". So, if Oswald was a native Russian speaker, as John Armstrong contends and I agree with, then it's reasonable that "Mos" would come out "Moc". But, if that's true, why would the hard k sound of "kow" also be spelled with a c? It isn't Mos-sow.
If you listen to Oswald speaking- on the radio in New Orleans and at the Dallas PD- you can tell that he had excellent command of English, and he spoke it better than most native-born Americans. I'd be willing to bet any amount of money that "Harvey" spoke English better, and I mean much better, than the native born "Lee" who must have sounded like a hick. Just compare Oswald's voice to that of Robert Oswald, who had a strong Texas/Louisiana accent, which Oswald didn't have. How come? If they grew up in the same household, why were their voices and accents so different? Answer: they didn't grow up in the same household.
Remember that there was nothing broken about Oswald's English. He did NOT sound like a foreigner. He did not speak English with a Russian accent. His command and control of his English was excellent, and there is no way he would have written "Moccow." It's just the relentless manipulation of our minds.
The official story of the JFK assassination is so preposterous, it is truly evil to espouse it. The JFK debauchery goes to the deepest, darkest, foulest underbelly of the American cesspool. There are things that are as bad, but there is nothing worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.