Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The most recent communication from the Architects and Engineers shed light on just how biased the judge was in the case they lost to NIST over the collapse of Building 7. 

In his decision, the judge put the assertions of AEfor911truth in quotes. You know how people do that when they want to ridicule someone's claims. The quotation marks indicate that the writer considers the statements ludicrous and deserving of scorn. 

But, in this case, the judge did that for claims that are not in dispute, that are not subject to ridicule because they are plainly factual. An example is that he put in quotes that "Building 7 was never hit by a plane." 

That was not contentious. It is absolutely indisputable that Building 7 was not hit by a plane. No one claims otherwise. By putting the statement in quotes, the judge was, in effect, saying, "These idiots actually believe that Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane."

It shows just how biased and close-minded the judge was, and really, it exposes his total unfitness to adjudicate the case. 

But, it shouldn't be surprising because it comes down to attitude, and that attitude is common, especially in politicians.  And to me, it demonstrates why the effort to establish 9/11 truth in the U.S. federal court system is a lost cause. Any such case is an attack on the federal government, and the judge works for the federal government. His contempt for the Architects and Engineers is obvious, although it is a contempt born of ignorance, stupidity, and wanton incompetence. Still, it was predictable, and they are not likely to fare better in the future.