Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The Shooter's left leg is cut off in the Beers photo.

But, that can't be right. His left leg is too long. And Beers was way back by the wall up on a ladder, so there's no way the camera's location caused this. To show you what I mean, I drew in the missing part of the leg.

So, according to the Beers photo, that was the Shooter's position when he shot Oswald. But, it's ridiculous because his feet weren't that far apart. Look at him in the Jackson photo.

So, his left foot is right below him there. But, look again at Beers, which was supposedly taken half a second before. 

And nobody ever said that the Shooter stopped short of Oswald and leaned in to close the distance. He wouldn't do that. He would just rush in and shoot him without doing any gymnastic stretch. 

From where Beers was, there is no way the leg would have been cut off. It had to be in his camera field. So, what were they trying to accomplish with that? What were they trying to hide? 

They were trying to hide how short the Shooter was. If they just had his foot down beneath him, you'd see how short he was. He was too short to be Jack Ruby who was the same height as Oswald 5'9". That is another dealbreaker about the Garage Shooter, that he was too short to be Jack Ruby. 

5'9 was and is the average height of a man. How could this guy be 5'9?

He wasn't 5'9", and he couldn't be Jack Ruby. He was too damn short.