Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This compares the Shooter in the Beers photo with the Shooter in the KRLD film. It's the same time; the time of the shot.

Notice that in Beers, the Shooter is stretching, with a great distance between his two feet. (Since his leg was cut off, I added in the part that was missing.) It's very different in KRLD, where his feet are closer together. You can't reconcile these two images. So, what is the explanation for the discrepancy?

I think the arrangement in Beers is phony. I think his left foot was planted much closer to his right foot. But, the problem was that his short stature stood out; he was too short to be Ruby, who was 5'9".

So, they took out their paint, and they lengthened his left leg. In fact, they made it too long. The photographer, Jack Beers, was back by the rear wall, standing on a ladder. So, his position would not have made the left leg loom so large. He wasn't to the right behind the leg; he was back with us. But, by lengthening his leg and making it look like the Shooter lowered himself, it created the illusion that he was taller. Note that the bullet was shot at a downward angle. The bullet entered Oswald at the level of the 7th rib, and it settled under the skin at the level of the 11th rib. You just have to read the Surgeon's Report to know that. So, it was shot downward not upward. But, the shooting was done later. They weren't going to shoot Oswald in the garage. They needed complete control to place that bullet with exact surgical precision. They certainly were not going to do it in the garage.

This is just one more visual contradiction in a sea of them. The official story of the Oswald shooting is a complete lie. Ruby wasn't even there. He was already tucked away on the 5th floor, waiting to be slipped into the story- not that he was aware of it. Ruby was gone mentally. It was the Dallas Police and FBI who did it.