Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is a new collage of Ruby and the Garage Shooter. 

On the left, it's Ruby from the next morning, when they were taking him to the County Jail, just as they were supposed to be doing with Oswald the day before, though that was just a ruse. Notice on the left how thin Ruby was at the time. His doctor in Dallas had put him on amphetamines as "diet pills," and I bet he was a CIA doctor. Why don't we know his name?  

On the right is the Garage Shooter, as per the Beers photo. Notice how pudgy he was. He had this small round head, a short neck, and burly body. One reporter in the garage, a French guy, described him as "strong and muscled" but really, he was just thick and burly. 

On the left, Ruby did not have such long strands of hair. That's how the photographic hair enhancement went that time. They did it routinely in his photos, and it looked different every time. They did it because of the thick mop of hair we see on the Garage Shooter, and it was a mop (a toupee').  Remember, this was 1963, pre-Beatles. The long hair trend hadn't begun yet. Few, if any, men had such a long, matted hair in back. It was a wig.  And no one who was practically bald on top would have such long hair at the bottom. So, they had to routinely give Ruby more hair in order the sell the idea that he was the Garage Shooter. 

The inset picture on the far left is from an Easter parade in Dallas in 1960, so 3 1/2 years before. Notice how bald he was on top, and you know that baldness only goes in one direction. A man can lose a lot of hair in 3 1/2 years. And that little tuft in front must surely be fake. Why? Because: Male Pattern Baldness doesn't go like that. And if it did happen, why would he keep it so short? If he actually did have hair in front, yes, he would let it grow long enough to provide some coverage. And there's proof that it's fake because it was a film, and in the film, Ruby takes his hat off and combs his hair. However, he only combs it on the sides. He never drags the comb across the top. Why? Because: he didn't have any hair there. As we look at it, he is holding the comb in his right hand and his hat in his left hand. In the film we see him comb the right side; then comb the left side; then put his hat back on. He never combs the top.