Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 Pete Souza, who was Obama's and Reagan's White House photographer, posted this image of Trump sans the bandage, pointing out that his ear looks like it was never traumatized. 

However, when you zoom in, you do see a little bruise. 

Do you see the red just inside the helix, which is the cartilaginous rim that goes around the ear? I presume it's a scab. That's what's left of the wound. But, how could he have been struck by a bullet there? If he was struck at all by a bullet, it would have had to do more damage than that. This is what we're talking about:

I don't see how that bullet could have caused such a small, localized wound without damaging the helix at all. It makes me think that FBI Director Christopher Wray was right that Trump was hit with shrapnel or a flying glass particle. I don't see how how an AR-15 bullet could cause such a tiny, localized, and slight wound. No way.  And frankly, that redness could just be makeup. I'm not saying that it is, or that it probably is, but I am saying that he definitely was not hit by a bullet.