Saturday, June 27, 2026

 That guy at the door talking to the cop is definitely Oswald, and no one should be swayed because the government said it was 1:30 or 2:00 or 2:30, and I've heard all those times. The government lies. It lies all the time. It lies about everything. If you haven't figured that out yet, you're living behind a veil.

The funny thing is that the company line is that that person is a woman. That is ridiculous too. One of the many differences between men and women, in case you don't know, is that men tend to have square, geometric shoulders, whereas women tend to have soft, gently sloping shoulders, which adds to their femininity and charm. That person hsa got the squarest shoulders I've ever seen.

Now, his image is distorted. If you look closely, you can see that his long neck is pixellated. That happens when you enlarge an image excessively. But, his image hasn't been enlarged. He is small in the picture because he is far from the camera. So, there is no excuse for that distortion, and I'm sure it was deliberate.

Just look at the likeness between the shape of the head, the lay of the hair, the length of the neck, the slenderness. What, do you think that we live in a world of coincidences? That is not Billy Lovelady, by the way. Lovelady was inside the building at the time. So, you think there was another guy besides him who looked and dressed like Oswald? No, no, no. The likeness that we see is due to the fact that that is Oswald.


The Dallas Police were inspecting the box cars even beforre the motorcade arrived. James Jarman said that when he and Harold Norman walked down Houston Street to reach the back door of the building, that they saw police swarming the box cars in the railway yard. That was at 12:20. So, Dallas Police having custody of these three tramps at 12:34 is not a stretch.


He does look eerily like Oswald. There were only 33 employees at the TSBD. That guy had to be one of them. Why else would he be up there? So, anyone who wants to fight this needs to get the list of 33 employees and go through it. See if you can find another employee who looked like him. There was only one: Lee Harvey Oswald.


Who are you going to believe? Officialdom, or your own eyes?

 Some people want to play hardball over when the Three Tramps were paraded at the top of Dealey Plaza. One guy said it was 1:30. Oh really? Well, one search engine said this: The Three Tramp photos were taken between 2:20 and 2:30 PM on November 22, 1963.  I asked Chat GPT, and it said that there is a discrepancy, that the Portal of Texas History says 2 pm, but the Sixth Floor Museum says 2:30. Why am I not surprised.

I tell you that there is a clock in the photo that was taken in front of the Texas Book Despository, and that clock is Lee Harvey Oswald, who is in the photo. If you look closely at the man talking to the Police Officer, you can see on his left wrist the ID bracelet that Oswald wore. That is Lee Harvey Oswald, and that means the photo was taken at 12:33 or 12:34. Oswald in the photo trumps all the lies. And there is nothing more lied about than the JFK assassination.



Friday, June 26, 2026

 I shall continue with what happened after Oswald got to the doorway. Of course, he went from the doorway to the 2nd floor lunch room, and I want to discuss how and why that happened. But first, it's unfortunate that many people deny that it happened. They think it's a fabrication, a lie, and that is ridiculous because Baker said it, Truly said it, and Oswald said it. It's in the Fritz Notes that Oswald said it. So, how could they all say it if it wasn't true? It's not like Baker, Truly, and Oswald had the opportunity to conspire together to tell a lie. In fact, even just Baker and Truly could not have conspired together to lie. They didn't know each other. They didn't refer to each other by name. It was the superintendent and the officer.


It takes a lot of trust to conspire to lie with someone. Strangers don't do that. And they were strangers.


And if Oswald didn't go to the lunchroom and back, where was he for about 3 minutes? We know he was in the doorway, and I am going to discuss exactly when he left the doorway for the lunch room. But, guess what he did after going to the lunch room? He returned to the doorway,. And we have a second image of Oswald in the doorway. It's in one of the Three Tramps photos. This is Oswald, back in the doorway, 3 minutes after the first time he was captured in the doorway.


So, we know what happened. Oswald went to the lunchroom, where he had his encounter with Baker and Truly. Then he walked back down to the doorway, taking the same route he took to reach it; he walked through the office area on the 2nd floor and then down the elegant stairs in the southeast corner of the building.


And when he got back to the 1st floor, he had an encounter with Robert MacNeil, the Candian journalist who eventually became an anchor on PBS News. MacNeil asked Oswald where the pay phone was, and Oswald told him. After that, Oswald exited the building, and that is when he was captured in the Three Tramps photo.




So, it's Oswald in the upper right corner. They distorted his image. You can see how pixelated it looks, and there's no valid reason for that. Another way they cope with is to mostly crop Oswald out of it. But, it is definitely Oswald. And that means that that photo had to have been taken in the 12:33 to 12:34 window.


I know that, officially, all the Backyard photos were taken after 2 pm, but no, this photo was taken betwen 12:33 and 12:34. And the Dallas Police were manning the freight cars looking for suspicious charact ers even before the motorcade.


And let's consider the story of that photo. You see Oswald talking to a Dallas cop. But, who started the conversation? Oswald did. How do I know? It's because the officer is mostly facing straight at the doorway, while Oswald is facing the officer squarely. So, Oswald walked up to the officer, not vice versa.


What was Oswald saying to him? I can only speculate. Perhaps he was explaining why he was leaving; that it didn't look like they were going to resume working that day, so he was going to go home. I'm not even going to try to conjure up a response for the officer. The officer may have been Dallas Police Inspector J. Herbert Sawyer. Of course, he never admitted to talking to Oswald, but by the time he testified, he certainly knew what was expected of him.


And it was right after that that Oswald left Dealey Plaza on his trek back to his boarding house. Some people deny that he went there too, although he certainly did.


So, for years, I have shown you images of Oswald in the doorway during the assassination (Altgens and Wiegman) and now I have shown you an image of Oswald in the doorway a few minutes after that. Next time, I'll tell you what happened in the time between the two images.

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

 I know it is jolting to hear that Oswald didn’t own a rifle. But, he didn’t, and the evidence for it is strong and layered. I’m going to give you the list, and if you are an Oswald defender, it is very important that you get onboard with this.

First, Oswald said he didn’t. And if he did, and someone used his gun to shoot JFK, he would have put it that way to the police. “Yes, I own a rifle, but I didn’t shoot anyone with it. Someone else must have taken it and done it just to frame me.”  He wasn’t going to lie to the police.

Second, Marina, when first asked by Dallas Police if Oswald owned a rifle, she said that he used to but it got sold. If he currently owned one, she wouldn’t have said that. She would have referred to the rifle that he owned. But, since he didn’t own one, she wanted to give them something that pertained to a rifle.

Third, everything about the purchase of the rifle, and its odyssey afterwards, is riddled with incongruities. He supposedly played hooky from work to go to the Post Office to get the money order, but John Armstrong found his work ledger from Jaggars/Chiles/Stovall that day, and he completed 9 printing jobs during the time he was supposed to be away. The whole issue of a rifle for A. Hidell going to the P.O. Box of Lee Harvey Oswald has never been explained or resolved. Try to imagine it. He goes to the counter and says, “I’m here to get my rifle. I’m A. Hidell.”  Postal clerk: “Well, this box belongs to Lee Harvey Oswald, and you’re not listed.”  Oswald: “Well, that’s me too; it’s my other name.” And then what? He pulls out his military ID for LHO and his draft card for Alek Hidell? You think that would have resulted in them handing the rifle over to him?

I don’t believe Oswald had a P.O. Box. He never said he did. They cost money, and he was as poor as a church mouse. And he didn’t one. What for? Postal Inspector Harry Hines said that the only things that went to the P.O. Box were Russian and Socialist newspapers. Bull shit. Oswald didn’t spend money on that. And if he read Russian and Socialist newspapers, why weren’t any found in his boarding room? But, the kicker is that when he wrote his fail-safe letter to Marina, before he, supposedly, went out to shoot Walker, he told her, in Russian, that if the worst happens, she should do these 10 things right away. And first on the list was go to the P.O. Box. Why would that have been on the list at all, let alone be the first thing? The truth is that he never wrote that letter, and he never went out to shoot Walker. The plotters wrote the letter, and they put the P.O. Box first on the list to substantiate him having a P.O. Box.

The stuff that John Armstrong found about the claimed mail-order of the rifle is so wild, it’s comical. For instance, after sneaking away from work to go the post office, Oswald, for some reason, walked to a distant letter box to mail the letter. Then, the letter reached Kleine’s Sporting Goods in Chicago the very next day, even though at the time, the Post Office had no overnight delivery at any price. Read John Armstrong because it is one of the most brilliant pieces of research ever done. 

https://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html

Then, as I have told you, neither Ruth nor Marina claimed that Oswald took a rifle with him to New Orleans. Then, the rifle that never went to New Orleans could not have come back because the story that Oswald snuck it into Ruth Paine’s station wagon, just hoping that it would wind up in her garage and stay there is no credible because no one would do that. And when I say no one, I mean not one of the 8.3 billion people on Earth would do it. Nobody would do that. Oswald had friends in New Orleans. If he owned a rifle, he could have left it with one of them. And that’s what he would have done if he had owned one, which he didn’t. Ruth Paine was going to be housing and feeding his pregnant wife and his daughter. And some mother that Ruth was. She put her own two young kids in her car to sit through that long drive from Dallas to New Orleans. Then, as soon as they got there, they had to pack up the car with Marina’s stuff and drive back. What a cruel thing to do to her kids. Some people think Ruth had a sex thing for Marina, and maybe they’re right.

But, Marina must have appreciated what Ruth was doing for her. So, if Oswald said, “Let’s sneak my rifle into her car and then you sneak it in to her garage” Marina would have said Yebat tebya.  Look it up.

And what about the Michael Paine, who was the most accommodating ex-husband in the history of marriage. He let Ruth drag his kids to New Orleans and back, and return with two more mouths to feed. Can you name a single other estranged husband who let his estranged wife do that? And then the tales he told about the many times he moved the stuffed blanket around in the garage; always wondering what it was but never peeking. Was it tent poles? Other camping equipment?  A military shovel?  Who knows? His job was to pay the bills and keep everyone fed. He even did the shopping.

Supposedly, Oswald did use the rifle when he was in Dallas. He repeatedly went to the shooting range to practice, and he sometimes shot diagonally at other people’s targets, just to be an asshole. But even among lone-nutters, there is a growing community of them who admit that that whole story is a lie. Davie Reitz, whom I have communicated with, is one of them. He has admitted that it’s a lie. After all, Oswald had no car. So, how did he get to Irving for that if the rifle was stored there? How did he get the rifle out of the garage? How did he get to the range? (This was before Uber.) How did he get back to the Paine house to sneak the rifle back in the garage? And then how did he get back to Oak Cliff? And remember: Oswald, at that time, had no friends. No friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends.

And Oswald did NOT own a rifle. He said he didn’t, and he didn’t. Every Oswald defender needs to know that and proclaim it.

Sunday, June 21, 2026

 I shall continue with what happened to Oswald on 11/22, but first, I want to clear things up about the claim of finding a fiber from the Oswald's blanket on the homemade bag. It is a moot question, a nonsense question, because Oswald owned no rifle. Therefore, there was no rifle to wrap in any blanket. And Oswald said he owned no rifle. And to everyone who believes in Oswald's innocence, you have to believe what he said because, being innocent, he had no reason to lie- about anything.

It is in the record that, when first asked by Dallas Police if Oswald owned a rifle, Marina said that he used to, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia to go rabbit-hunting. Obviously, she wouldn't have brought that up if he currently owned a rifle. So, she was tacitly saying the same thing that Oswald said, that he did not own a rifle in November 1963. And therefore, everything about the riffle story, including the blanket, the homemade bag, and everything else, has to be bogus.

The blanket story is preposterous even if Oswald had owned a rifle because not Oswald, and not anyone else, would sneak his rifle into the station wagon of a pacifist/gun-hater and just hope that it wound up in her garage. Oswald had friends in New Oreleans, and I am referring to Guy Bannister and his groupies. Oswald could have left the rifle with one of them- if he had one, which he didn't.

The whole story is a crock of lies and the blanket fiber fabrication is just one its many elements. Oswald had nothing to do with any rifle, with any paper, or with any blanket. It's all just a pack of lies concocted by Kennedy's real killers.

 You realize, there is no evidence that Oswald made a bag. Nobody at the TSBD saw him seizing or handling paper. Neither Frazier, nor Marina, nor Ruth saw him with any paper on Thursday night. And on Friday morning, Frazier claimed that Oswald had a grocery bag that was 2 feet long. He meant a literal grocery bag- not brown paper taped together. If you or I or anyone else had brown paper and wettable tape, no one is is going to take what we make from it for a grocery bag. The point is that no witnesses, not even Frazier, corroborated the brown paper story. Frazier did not say that the bag looked homemade, and he never said that Oswald was in possession of brown paper. So, it's just the government, in its fiat authority, claiming that Oswald built a bag from brown paper.

Frazier had to park at the distant parking lot that was several blocks away. He claimed to stay in the car for a while to run the engine to recharge the battery. So, Oswald got to and entered the building long before Frazier did. And he was seen right away by Jack Doughterty, who testified that Oswald had no long bag. Joseph Ball tried to hammer Dougherty about it, but he couldn't break him. Dougherty held firm. He was respectful, but he wouldn't budge.

But, I want to point out that paper bags fail sometimes. Even when they contain just groceries, they sometimes fail. But, jagged rifle parts? So they didn't tear the homemade bag? And when Oswald was ready to access the rifle parts, he didn't just tear the paper? Why wouldn't he? It was the most practical thing to do.

Oswald asked James Jarman about the crowd building up outside, and Jarman told him that the President was going to pass the building. So, Oswald didn't know, and that means two things: it means he could not have intended to shoot Kennedy, and it means that the people who were going to shoot Kennedy did not tell him anything about it. Oswald was completely in the dark.

When lunch time came, Oswald went to the 1st floor lunch room where he stored his lunch, and he ate there. Three of his questioners wrote that down, that he said he ate his lunch in the 1st floor lunch room, commonly known as the domino room. Those three questioners were Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty. That is where he ate his lunch, and there is no reason to doubt it. He did not eat his lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room. He never did that. That was where the office workers ate. Oswald was a warehouse worker, and the domino room is where they ate. There was also a newspaper there, which he liked to browse through as he ate.

Oswald said that Jarman and Norman were around when he was there eating, which Jarman confirmed. He said that he had bought a sandwich from a concession truck out front, and he put the sandwich on the counter in the domino room.

And then after eating his cheese sandwiches and apple, Oswald went outside to watch the motorcade. Two interrogators wrote it down: Fritz and Hosty, and we have a handwritten note by each of them. Here is Hosty's note. The note states plainly that Oswald said that after eating his lunch in the 1st floor lunch room that he went outside to watch the Presidential Parade.

And it's him in the Altgens doorway. Don't anybody spew that Lovelady shit here because I won't stand for it; I will ban you. The U.S. government killed Kennedy, and then they concocted the Lovelady story. That is the truth, and we are not debating it because it's past debating.


Thursday, June 18, 2026

 Let’s look at the Thursday and Friday in Oswald’s life. On Thursday, he rode with Frazier to Irving, and supposedly, he had a wad of brown wrapping paper with him. Frazier never claimed to see it, nor did Marina and Ruth. Did Oswald hide it? How and where? Did he stuff it in his pants? I don’t’ think so. And Troy West, the mailer, never saw Oswald milling around his mailing station. There is no evidence whatsoever that Oswald took any paper from the TSBD.

That’s a problem, but claiming that he made a bag? That’s just plain stupid. I am 75 years, and I have never in my life made a bag. I’ve never had the slightest notion to make a bag. I’ve never met anyone who told me they made bag. Making bags is not something that people do, nor do they know how. What they do is wrap things in paper, and that they do often. Surely, Oswald, had he sought to contain rifle parts in paper, would have stretched out the paper, but the rifle parts on it, and then wrapped it all together. Saying that “Oswald made a bag” is just another way of saying the U.S. government killed Kennedy.

I’ve been debating this with Chat GPT, and what it tries to do is back off the “make a bag” claim as much as possible, saying that he just folded the paper in half once, put the rifle parts within and started taping. It does not refrain from denying the obvious, such as that Detective Montgomery’s bag was a manufactured one and not just paper and tape. Then, it’s preposterous that rifle parts didn’t tear the paper, and it’s equally preposterous that Oswald didn’t tear the paper deliberately to access the parts when he was ready.  Everything about the bag story is goofy.

So, why did Oswald go to Irving? That’s the wrong question. The right question is: How did he come to have $68? He hadn’t worked since July, and he was poor and struggling even when he was working. He started at the TSBD on October 16 after being unemployed for 3 months. He made $1.11/ hour, and he had to pay his living expenses and give money to Marina. So, where did he get that $68? It is mathematically impossible that he saved it up from working. He didn’t steal it, so somebody must have given it to him.  That money was central to him going to Irving. He showed it to Marina and told her that he wanted to get an apartment for the four of them. She told him she wasn’t ready. She didn’t say that she never would or that she wanted a divorce. She just said she wasn’t ready. Then, they spent the night together.

Supposedly, Oswald got up in the middle of the night to go to the garage to look for the rifle. I repeat that you can’t get the rifle to that house from New Orleans, and you can’t get the rifle from Dallas to New Orleans in the first place. But, in addition to that, you have to recognize how much noise registers at night. Floors squeak; faucets squeal; doors rattle. And we’re talking about a project, starting with finding the rifle, making the bag, and getting it all ready.

But, let’s look further at Oswald imploring Marina to move back in with him in an apartment he would get for them. Marina attested to it, and there’s no reason to doubt her. But, how do you reconcile it with him intending to kill Kennedy? In other words, how can you have both on the table? It seems like it would have to be one or the other. How could he expect to kill Kennedy and establish a new domicile for his family? He couldn’t. Oswald’s appeal to his wife, and reported by her, defies that he had any thought of killing Kennedy. And of course, he surely had no thought of shooting Kennedy because he didn’t own a rifle. He had nothing with which to shoot him.

Frazier said that he and Oswald never discussed Kennedy’s visit to Dallas. But, Oswald and Marina discussed it. She said that she told him that she wished very much that she could see the President and First Lady. You’d think that at that moment, he would have piped in the President would be passing his building. But, he didn’t, and that’s because he didn’t know. The next morning at work, when he saw people congregating on the sidewalk, he did not know why they were doing it. So, he asked James Jarman, and Jarman told him about the motorcade passing by. And that’s when Oswald found out about it. It is yet another reason why there is no way Oswald ever had any thought of shooting Kennedy. That testimony of Jarman’s is one of the most powerful in the Warren Commission, and it exonerates Oswald. Of course, the Warren Commission ignored it. To be continued.  

Saturday, June 13, 2026

 What about the story that Ruth and Marina went into the garage with the Police and saw the empty blanket on the floor? It is complete bull shit. It could not possibly have happened. For one thing: there was no rifle, and therefore, there no rifle was ever wrapped in a blanket.

I explained that Ruth and Marina drove Oswald to the bus station when he moved to New Orleans, and neither said anything about him taking a rifle with him. The WC interrogator tried to get Ruth Paine to admit to a long, pole-like object that was 40 inches long, but she refused to do it. She was quite adamant. And the same goes for what was transported back to Irving from New Orleans.

Mr. JENNER - Was there a rifle packed in the back of the car?

Mrs. PAINE - No.

Mr. JENNER - You didn't see any kind of weapon?
Mrs. PAINE - No.
Mr. JENNER - Firearm, rifle, pistol, or otherwise?
Mrs. PAINE - No; I saw nothing of that nature.
Mr. JENNER - Did you drive them to your home?
Mrs. PAINE - Yes.

So, you don't have a rifle going to New Orleans, and you don't have one coming back from New Orleans. Therefore, there was no rifle in Ruth Paine's garage.

And, the very idea that Oswald would sneak his rifle into Ruth Paine's car and hope that it wound up in her garage is ridiculous. It is preposterous. Nobody would do that. He had friends in New Orleans, the Guy Bannister groupies. He could have left the rifle with one of them- or with Guy Bannister himself. Nobody would do what Oswald supposedly did.

It is widely acknowledged that when first asked if Oswald owned a rifle, Marina said that he used to, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia. Months later, when testifying to the WC, she waxed on and on about him owning a rifle, but that was after she was MK-ULTRA'd by the feds. She was brainwashed, and I can just imagine how they went about doing it, telling her that she was traumatized, and that her mind was playinf tricks on her, suppressing her memory of what happened, but they were going to help her get her memories back. And lo and behold, she eventually remembered him getting a rifle, going to Mexico City, trying to shoot General Walker, etc, and all those things being completely bogus.

Before anything was done to her, when she was first asked, she said that Oswald currently owned no rifle. Period. End of sentence. And that settles it. You can't reconcile that with what followed, the wild stories she told. Those stories were planted in her by the FBI. Her brainwashing involved drugs, sex, you do realize she got emaciated during her "protective custody." Look at the collage.

Here is their attempt to pressure Ruth Paine about the rifle coming back with her from New Orleans.


Mr. JENNER - Now, was there a separate long package of any kind?
Mrs. PAINE - I do not recall such a package.
Mr. JENNER - Was there a separate package of any character wrapped in a blanket?
Mrs. PAINE - No. There was a basket such as you use for hanging your clothes. It carried exactly that, clothes and diapers, and they weren't as neat as being in suitcases and duffels would imply. There was leftovers stuffed in the corner, clothes and things, but rather open.
Mr. JENNER - So you saw no long rectangular package of any kind or character loaded in or placed in your station wagon?
Mrs. PAINE - No, it doesn't mean it wasn't there, but I saw nothing of that nature.
Mr. JENNER - You saw nothing?
Mrs. PAINE - I saw nothing.
Mr. JENNER - When you arrived in Irving, Tex., were you present when your station wagon was unpacked?
Mrs. PAINE - Marina and I did that with the exception of the duffels.
Mr. JENNER - You did it all yourself and you took out of the station wagon everything in it other than the two duffel bags?
Mrs. PAINE - Yes.
Mr. JENNER - Now, in the process of removing everything other than the two duffel bags-on the occasion on the 24th of September 1963 when you reached Irving, Tex., did you find or see any long rectangular package?
Mrs. PAINE - I recall no such package.
Mr. JENNER - Did you see any kind of a package wrapped in the blanket?
Mrs. PAINE - Not to my recollection.
Mr. JENNER - Did you see any package
Mrs. PAINE - I don't recall seeing the blanket either.

They eventually showed her the blanket, but Ruth wouldn't budge.

Mr. JENNER - And you are certain that you did not see the blanket in your station wagon when you arrived in Irving?

Mrs. PAINE - I do not recall seeing the blanket in my station wagon.

I tell you again that when Marina was first asked about Oswald owning a rifle before anything was done to her mind, she tacitly denied that he currently owned a rifle. All subsequent revisions to that have to be lies. Oswald said that he didn't own a rifle. So, he said it, and Marina said it. They both said it.

To all Americans: your government killed Kennedy. And your government is who wove all the friggin' lies about it that plague us to this day. This is what they did to Marina.



Wednesday, June 10, 2026

 Let's talk about the curtain rods. Oswald denied ever telling Frazier anything about curtain rods, and I believe him, And if you believe Frazier, you better stick around to the end because that man is not right in the head and never was.

The curtain rod story is stupid. How can you compare a flimsy pair of curtain rods to a military rifle that was scoped and 42 inches long? And you don't need a bag for curtain rods. They fit right in your hand. It would be less convenient to carry them in a bag than to just carry them. And why would Oswald go to Irving for that? They weren't his curtain rods. So what, is he a thief now besides being a murderer? He had $68 in cash, which was equivalent to over $740 today. And he lived in a boarding room which had curtains. I realize that, supposedly, it was a lie, but if Oswald were going to lie, I don't think his mind would even go to that.


The whole point is moot anyway since Oswald did not own a rifle. He said he didn't, and he wasn't lying. I have explained why you can't get the rifle to Ruth Paine's garage, but you also can't get it to New Orleans. Ruth and Marina drove Oswald to the bus station when he moved to New Orleans, and they both told WC interrogators what he brought with him, and neither of them claimed that he had a rifle. The interrogators didn't even recognize the significance of it. But, if Oswald didn't take a rifle to New Orleans, then he couldn't have brought one back from New Orleans, in any way, shape, or form.

Oswald did say that he brought a bag with him on Friday morning, and it contained his lunch: cheese sandwiches and an apple. And he stated where he ate it, in the domino room. If a man is going to shoot the President of the United States at 12:30, does he enjoy a leisurely lunch at 12? I would consider that a very strange behavior.

But, just think: the Dallas Police could have checked the trash can in the domino room for the refuse from the lunch Oswald said he ate. If they didn't find it, it would have proved that he lied. Of course, they never said anything about it, but if I could think of it, and I'm no Columbo, don't you think they could? So, maybe they did check, and if so, I assume they found that refuse. But then, they said nothing about it publicly, which I consider an obstruction of justice. The American people deserved to know about it if it happened.

Frazier is a mental case and always has been. In his WC testimony, he told Joseph Ball that he watched the motorcade from the steps, standing one step down from the top, next to the handrail. But, later in the questioning, Ball asked him why he isn't seen in the Altgens photo, and Frazier said it was because he was standing way up and back in the shadows. I'm sure he was oblivious to the fact that he contradicted himself, but what about Joseph Ball? Well, he didn't put Frazier on the spot about it, and I know why. It was because Frazier was his witness; saying the things that he wanted to hear.

At one of the mock trials, Frazier said that Lovelady was very short, just 5'2'. In reality, he was 5'8". The FBI measured him. Frazier also said that Lovelady watched the motorcade from the bottom of the steps; his mind not registering on the fact that it meant he couldn't be Doorman. In reality, Lovelady was standing right next to Oswald at the top of the steps. He was the guy visoring his eyes with his hands.

Wesley Buell Frazier, Billy Nolan Lovelady, Lee Harvey Oswald. Do you notice a pattern? The use of three names, it's a lone nuts assassin thing. Larry Rivera was the first to suggest that both Frazier and Lovelady were alternate patsies, in case things didn't work out with Oswald. And I believe Larry is right. And all three were in the doorway.

But, the big mystery is: How did Frazier come to say what he did about the curtain rods? Did his interrogators give it to him? I think there is a good chance that they did. As for Oswald, he certainly didn't go to Irving to get curtain rods or a non-existent rifle. He went there to leave most of that cash with his wife (again: it was equivalent to over $1800 today, and I bet even Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos don't walk around with that much cash on them). He was also hoping that she would agree to move back in with him, now that they had that money with which to get them an apartment. Unfortunately for him, she said she wasn't ready. Still, she let him spend the night with her. And no, he didn't get up to search for a non-existent rifle and make a bag out of paper and tape. The official story of the JFK assassination is not only wrong; it's stupid,

Another big question is: how did he accumulate that $68? He hadn't worked since July, and he only started at the TSBD a month before. He made $1.11/hr, and he had to support himself and give money to Marina. So, unless he stole it, and I'm sure he didn't,, it means that somebody must have given it to him. But who? I don't know.


Friday, June 5, 2026

The official story of the JFK assassination, in all its elements, is ridiculous. It is preposterous. It has stood only because of the fiat power of the U.S. government and the subservience of the U.S. Media.

The same goes for the U.S. educational establishment. You realize that education at the college level, and even at the primary and secondary levels, depends on the federal government. And by that I mean government money. Even private svchools are dependent on government money. And adhering to the government's version of history is part of the deal.

An example of the ridiculousness is the paper bag, the one that Oswald supposedly made. And just as the Mauser rifle quickly got replaced with a Carcano, the manufactured paper bag that Detective Montgomery marched around Dealey Plaza with quickly got replaced with a weird oblong thing that looks nothing like a commercial paper bag.

This bag is obviously not just brown paper that was taped together. It is a real paper bag that was manufactured. There is no way Oswald made it. But, the whole idea of him making a paper bag is stupid. It is totally unnecessary. If he wanted to wrap the rifle parts in brown paper, he would have spread the paper open somewhere, put the rifle parts on it, and then fold it up and tape it. In other words, you would wrap it like you would wrap a gift. You wouldn't start by making a bag.

And then, according to the official story, when he was ready to assemble the rifle at the TSBD, he preserved the bag. He didn't just tear it open; he poured the parts out of it to leave the bag intact. Notice how perfectly intact the bag was. There's not a rip, tear, or hole in it. And that's ridiculous because Oswald, supposedly, had to walk several blocks carrying the bag. The hard , jagged parts of a rifle are going to rip brown paper very easily, and especially if you have to walk with the package for several blocks, as Oswald supposedly did. The claim that the parts of a 42 inch rifle were carried for several blocks in this bag is just plain stupid.

And that goes for the whole official story of the JFK assassination; it is just plain stupid. And anyone who is a proponent of it needs to get the hell out of here. If you start piping your b.s. here, I will ban you in a New York second. I am 75 years old, and I am not wasting any of my remaining time talking to idiots.



Wednesday, May 27, 2026

 Some guy tried to make little of the idea that Oswald ordered the rifle as A. Hidell and had it sent to his P.O. Box, that of Lee Harvey Oswald. I asked at the post office and was told that if they notice it, they will definitely question the owner and ask who A. Hidell is. But, they admitted that, no infrequently, it goes unnoticed.


But, it's not going to go unnoticed when it's a rifle. A rifle doesn't fit in a P.O. Box. All they can do is put a notice in the box saying that there's something being held for you, and you need to go to the counter.


So, what was going to happen when Oswald went to the counter? He would have said he was here to pick up the rifle, and he would have showed the clerk the notice. And the notice would have said that the package was for A. Hidell. So, the clerk would have asked, "Are you A. Hidell?" And Oswald would have said that he was Lee Harvey Oswald, but that A. Hidell is an alias he uses. And the clerk would have said,


"How do we know that? Maybe A. Hidell is someone else, and you're just saying that to get his rifle. It's not like we can take your word for it. And why do you need an alias? Why didn't you order it under your own name? So, I'll tell you what we're going to do: We're going to return this rifle to Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago, and you can order it again, except this time, do it as Lee Harvey Oswald. Now: get the Hell out of here."


Now, that last line is more a Ralph Cinque thing. I doubt the postal clerk would have said that. But, the rest of it, he or she would have said, or something like it.


And why should we believe that Oswald had a P.O. Box? Postal Inspector Harry Hines said that the only thing Oswald got in his P.O. Box were Russian and Socialist newspapers. Do you really think Oswald subscribed to Russian and Socialist newspapers? And why would he need a P.O. Box for that? Why not have them sent to his home? Hines, by the way, was evil. He is also the one who lied saying that Oswald reversed his denial about not having gone to Mexico City at the Sunday morning interrogation. That is absurd, And why was a Postal Inspector invited to an Oswald interrogation? What's up with that?


I do NOT believe that Oswald had a P.O. Box. I think it's a lie, and to help sell the lie, the phony note from Oswald to his wife, written in perfect Russian, which was a to-do list, started with "Better go to the Post Office." Why was that important? She certainly had no interest in Russian and Socialist newspapers.


I tell you again that the U.S. government killed Kennedy, and Judgement Day is coming.


Tuesday, May 26, 2026

 

Bravo, Bill Binnie, for this brilliant piece on the Backyard Photos, which surely are bogus. To everyone, this is brilliant. Ralph Cinque 

The Backyard Photos are another topic that people discuss despite knowing a fraction of what they should know- This might help: March 31, 1963- LHO- Backyard Pictures- Oswald appeared to have posed for two pictures taken by Marina in the backyard of the Neely Street apartment in which he held his rifle and copies of the Worker and the Militant with his revolver tucked in his belt. He supposedly gave one of the pictures to his wife and asked her to keep it for June.
Two pictures were obtained from the garage of the Paines house on the afternoon of November 23, 1963. The Dallas Police found and marked those photographs as 133A and 133B, as well as a negative for 133B. Eventually there were seven total photographs in the series. 133C and 133D were provided by the widow of Dallas Police Officer Roscoe White. 133A Stovall and 133C Stovall were provided by Officer Stovall. 133A de Mohrenschildt was provided by George’s widow, Jean. On the back of 133A de Mohrenschildt was inscribed To My Friend George from Lee Oswald, 5463. In darker ink another transcription reads in Russian acrylic Hunter of Fascists, ha ha ha. HSCA handwriting expert Joesph McNally and two other experts said that the first inscription was Oswald’s handwriting. The Hunter of Fascists writing was found to not match Lee, Marina or George de Mohrenschildt. McNally said the Hunter phrase was written by one person and then retraced by someone unfamiliar with Russian acrylic. de Mohrenschildt testified that his wife found this picture in a vinyl record sleeve from his storage unit after they returned from Haiti. Michael Paine had dropped off the records at Everett Glovers house. de Mohrenschildt had let Marina borrow some of his English language records to help her learn English was the explanation. The Dallas Police had inventoried the vinyl records at the Paine house exhaustively as they did with the entire contents so 133A de Mohrenschildt was somehow missed or it was put in the record sleeve after the records had been returned by the investigators.
The 133B negative was found to have come from the Oswald Reflex camera, which Marina eventually said Oswald owned. Three weeks after the assassination, Robert Oswald went to the Paine house to pick up items Ruth Paine said belonged to Oswald. On February 24,1964 Robert gave the camera to the FBI. Robert said Lee bought the Imperial Reflex camera in 1957 and left it with Robert when Lee went to Russia. When Lee returned from Russia in 1962, Lee reacquired the camera from Robert. But the Dallas Police inventory of Oswald’s belongings did not list the Reflex camera. The Police did inventory a Russian Quera 2 camera and Stereo Realist camera. When shown a picture of the Reflex camera all four officers who did the inventory were certain it was not among the Oswald possessions found at the Paine house. A fifth officer Detective John McCabe told the FBI that he saw a light gray box camera in the Paines garage, but did not consider the Reflex camera to have evidentiary value to list it.
The Reflex camera was difficult to use and pictures were taken by holding it at waist height and looking down onto a view finder. Marina said initially that the camera she used was a point and click type. On January 29, 1964, Marina said Oswald’s owned two cameras. The Russian Quera 2 and the Stereo Realist which was consistent with what the Police inventoried. On February 19 th Marina indicated that the Stereo Realist camera did not look familiar. On February 25 th Marina said the Reflex camera was the one Oswald owned and was the camera Marina used to take the backyard photographs. On August 12 th 1964, the Stereo Realist camera was returned to Ruth Paine who said it was hers.
Based on Marina’s testimony, the only picture she took was the backyard picture. But there were eleven pictures taken with the Reflex camera mostly of Marina and June taken in New Orleans. A letter from Marina to Ruth indicates that it was Ruth who took the other eleven pictures. Marina indicated that Oswald developed the backyard photographs but the HSCA photo panel determined that both of the 133A and 133B photographs found in the Paines garage were developed in a drug store. The 133A de Mohrenschildt was developed non- commercially. When Oswald was shown the backyard picture by Fritz, he did not want to discuss it and then indicated he understood photography very well and would prove the picture was a fake.
The black polo style shirt and black pants worn in the photographs were not among Oswald’s belongings and there is no evidence Oswald owned such clothes. Being a frugal man with limited means, it would be very unlikely Oswald would have purchased expensive clothes and disposed of them. The rifle sling in the pictures was not the sling that was on the TSBD Carcano. The sling in the picture was confirmed by the FBI expert Lindahl Schoenfeld to be a piece of rope and the TSBD sling was a strap. The gun owner could have upgraded the strap but it hard to believe the very frugal Oswald with minimal funds would have made this cosmetic investment. There is strong debate about shadows below the chin being inconsistent with those from the rest of the body. The FBI went to great lengths to prove the shadows were compatible and then undermined their work by printing a reproduction that removed the image of the face. Differences in the jaw bone and chin structure between the person in the backyard picture and the historical Oswald are cited. Another issue was the 1993 discovery of a ghost photograph in which the person is carefully cutout of the backyard picture and only the background remained. A photograph in which Police Officer Bobby Brown replicated the backyard photograph was also found. Brown claimed that the Secret Service asked him to take the picture a few days after the assassination. Brown said he cut his image out of the ghost photograph because he didn’t want to be identified with it. A short examination shows that the ghost photograph is instead an exact match for Oswald in image 133C. When confronted with the proof, Brown changed his testimony and said he had cut out the Oswald image because the FBI wanted to have Oswald’s image on a white background. There was never an explanation as to why.
Detectives Amadic and Rose were asked how they found the pictures. Both said the pictures were among a packet of 47 photographs they found. Adamic said he numbered and initialed each photograph which was evident in the Warren Commission evidence. But Rose said he and McCabe found the photographs, which is demonstrably untrue. The pamphlets were incongruous since the Militant had a Troskyite message in favor of an international communist revolutions versus The Worker which was aligned with the Soviet Union. Also three people claimed to have seen the backyard photographs before they were found in the Paine’s garage on the afternoon of November 23. Reporter Jerry O’Leary confirmed to the FBI that he was shown one of the backyard photographs the evening of November 22 or the morning of November 23 at the Dallas Police Station. Michael Paine told the Warren Commission that on the night of the assassination the police asked him where Oswald was standing when he was holding the rifle in the picture that ended up on the cover of Life Magazine. Paine told the police he thought it was taken in the back of the Neely Street apartment because of the clapboard, although Paine had never seen the back of the Neely Street residence. Fritz describes asking Oswald late in the morning of November 23 or the early afternoon about the backyard photographs. Fritz said Oswald was evasive about the location and told Oswald that Mr. Paine mentioned the Neely Street residence. Michael Paine was at the Police station on Friday night and not Saturday morning or afternoon, so it appears that the backyard photograph was being discussed among O’Leary, Paine and Fritz before they had been found.
A core concern about the backyard photographs were the Roscoe White 133C and D versions. White began working with Dallas Police on October 7 th 1963, in the photographic department. White also served in the Marines and was at the Atsugi Japan base at the same time as Oswald. White’s wife Geneva worked in some capacity at Ruby’s Carousel Club. White’s wife and son believe that White was involved in the assassination. It was asserted that the subject of the backyard photograph was White and Oswald’s face was superimposed as Oswald claimed, based on a deformation of the right wrist that White suffered. One important piece of evidence that was not present during the initial searches of the property, but turned up at a later date, was the Imperial Reflex duo-lens camera. This inexpensive, gray metal body camera was proven by FBI photographic expert Lyndal Shaneyfelt to have taken the Backyard Photos. Marina stated that she had taken the photos with an American-made box camera gray made of aluminum. She eventually indicated that she had to look down into the viewfinder located on the top of the camera while holding the camera at chest level. A problem is that the persons wedding ring changes fingers depending on which picture is viewed-
April 5, 1963- LHO- Backyard Photographs- de Mohrenschildt said he was in Haiti so this could not be the date referenced in the Hunter of Fascists in the 133A de Mohrenschildt photograph because he would not have seen Oswald at that date. But this was untrue as de Mohrenschildt did not go to Haiti until April 13 or 14-
November 23, 1963- LHO- Backyard Photographs- The infamous Oswald backyard photographs were initially obtained from a search of the Paine garage in the afternoon. The Dallas Police found 133A and 133B and the negative for 133B. These pictures were turned over to the FBI and later reviewed by the Warren Commission-
February 21, 1964- LHO- Backyard Pictures- Life Magazine printed a highly incriminating cover picture of Oswald that was believed to have been taken late March 1963. The Warren Commission Report had not been issued and Life Magazine was read by half of the US population-
3.00.00 PM- LHO- Minox Camera- At least two cameras were found at the Paines’ on November 22. Numerous inventories kept by the Dallas Police listed a third camera: Item 375 “Minox” camera, or “small German camera and black case on chain.” And item 377, four rolls of Minox film. Minox was smaller than a cigar and weighed less than a cigarette lighter, featuring an excellent lens. A costly item far beyond Oswald’s budget, the Minox camera gained notoriety as a spy camera.
Detective Rose testified “A couple of FBI agents made three different trips to our office to talk to me about this camera. After they had received all the property they found that I had made a mistake, and that that really wasn’t a camera, it was a Minox light meter. However, as I told them at the time, I was sure that I had not made a mistake; it definitely was a camera and definitely did have film in it. However, they wanted me to change that in our property invoice to read Minox light meter and not read Minox camera. We never did change it.”
By January 30, according to the FBI, there never was a Minox camera at the Paine home and later that day, Ruth Paine stepped forward to claim ownership of a Minox on behalf of her husband. A Minox camera with serial number 27259, was turned into the FBI by Michael Paine on January 31, and returned to him shortly thereafter. However, according to researcher John Armstrong, another Minox camera is still housed in the National Archives and has been altered to prevent its serial number from being retrieved. It was speculated that Oswald may have received a Minox camera as part of his military training-