The whole book distributing business at the TSBD was just a front, as the TSBD was a CIA front company. If you haven't read The Spider's Web: the TSBD and the Dallas Plot by William Weston, you should.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/6017-spiders-web/

Let's look specifically at how they operated. Remember that they did not sell books to consumers. It was a wholesale operation, selling books to schools for classes. But, there is no evidence whatsoever they were wholesaling books. You know what wholesale means, which is buying in bulk or in volume.

What we know is that fulfillment at the TSBD involved "order-fillers" (including Oswald) going through the stacks of boxes of books to fulfill orders. There is no evidence that boxes were being sold.

Order-fillers were given invoices which had the titles they were to gather. And they were given a clipboard, although I don't know why they needed one. They were not given carts or wagons. And we don't see any carts or wagons. We see boxes of books with mostly illegible writing. Occasionally, you can make out a few words, such as Mathematics. Boxes of books are heavy, and it's hard to imagine skinny guy slike Oswald and Bonnie Ray Williams just carrying them by hand. Don't you think that if they were doing that, that it would have been established? We have been led to believe that what they were handling were units of books, and a number that could easily handled by hand. And they took the books down to the guy who did the shipping on the 1st floor: Troy West.

Now, there were quite a few order-fillers. Oswald, Frazier, Jaman, Norman, Williams- they were all order-fillers, and there were more. The only one we have ever heard about who did the shipping is Troy. But, he didn't call himself the shipper. He called himself the mailer. And the way he mailed things was to wrap them in brown paper using a Pitney Bowes wrapping machine.

But,, you wouldn't wrap a big box of books in brown paper. And those boxes presumably were shipped to the TSBD without being wrapped in brown paper. So, why would they have to be shipped out in brown paper?

But, what Troy West revealed to his questioner David Belin (who is the guy who, when asked, said that what Oswald was doing at 10th and Patton was going to Mexico. Ole'!) was that he didn't even work in the building. Troy West, the face of shipping at the TSBD, said that he didn't even work in the building.

Don't take my word for it. Read it yourself. So, Belin was trying to determine where exactly in the building Troy worked.

Mr. BELIN - Well I have a first floor map here of the Texas School Book Depository. Here is Elm Street and here is the front entrance. Here is Mr. Truly's office, and Here is Mr. Shelley's office. There is the stairway down to the basement, and there are the elevators and the back stairway. There are the toilets there. About where would you wrap mail there?
Mr. WEST - Well, my place was in the west side of the other building.

Now, you would think that when Belin heard that, that he would have stopped and said, "You mean, you didn't even work in this building?" But, Belin didn't do that. He just ignored and kept going.

Mr. BELIN - Was it near the stairway?
Mr. WEST - No; it wasn't close to the stairway.
Mr. BELIN - Was it closer to the Elm Street side of the building?
Mr. WEST - No, sir.
Mr. BELIN - What was it close to? The west side is the side near the railroad tracks and the triple underpass. Is that what you think is the west side?

You see what I mean? So, Troy West didn't work in that building. Thern, who did the shipping in that building? We don't know. And again, no one would wrap a big box of books in brown paper. There would be no need to because the heavy cardboard box was sufficient to endure the rigors of shipping. Putting brown paper over it wasn't going to be helpful, and it wasn't necessary.

We know that the "order-fillers" worked all morning. So, if they were bringing stock down to be shipped, why was there no stack of parcels ready to go out the door?

And who would run a business that way, with boxes of books stacked as high as 9 high? I wonder how that was accomplished because we don't see any fork-lifts, and there no ladders. What if you needed books that were in that 9th box on top? How would you get to it? And look at that mess on the 6th floor. Look at all the open boxes. Were they really supplying schools? And considering it was a very old warehouse, what about vermin and cockroaches? Wouldn't they keep the boxes sealed up? How come we never saw any stock that was readu to go out the door? Who was their shipper? We don't know. All we know about is Troy West, who called himself the mailer. You can't tell me they used the Post Office to ship boxes of books to schools. And Troy West didn't even work in that building. What he did, in whatever building he worked, was wrap small parcels in brown paper, so that they could be mailed. You don't ship books to schools that way.

The TSBD had 33 employees, not counting the higher-ups. Do you think one guy, Troy West, could wraps and mail enough parcels every day that the profit generated could pay the salares of all those people, plus that of the executives, plus all the other expeneses. How much did it cost to heat that building in the winter and cool it in the summer?

I stated in my last post that John Armstrong believes Oswald was driven to the theater, and I agree with him. John says it's because Oswald could not have walked to the theater and gotten there as early as he did. For me, that's true, but it's not the only reason.

I tell you that Oswald was being tracked and monitored the whole time. They never lost sight of him. Oswald was being controlled by his handlers. And they were not going to let him walk 1.1 miles in broad daylight. Consider how easy it would have been for people to have seen him and remembered him and reported it. Obviously, he couldn't be walking down Beckley Street towards Jefferson and be at 10th and Patton at the same time.

Remember also that city walking isn't like walking around a track. On the street, you have corners and traffic lights. And if there is no traffic light, you still have to wait until traffic clears. You can't just walk non-stop without being interrupted. It was 1.1 miles from his boarding room to the theater. A brisk walking pace is 15 minutes per mile. But, because of what I just said, it might take 20 minutes to walk a mile in the city. So, Oswald could never have reached the theater as early as he did.

The official story has it that the Oswald of fame snuck into the theater, and that makes no sense. He hadn't shot anyone. And if you don't agree with that, you shouldn't be here because you are not welcome here. I only want to interact with people who know he was innocent. There are plenty of other JFK groups, so LNs: go to them.

But, when you remove Oswald having committed two murders from the picture, it makes no sense for him to sneak in. He had $14 and change in his pocket, and a ticket cost less than a dollar. Plus, with everything going on, and him being worried (because he had lived in the Soviet Union and married a Soviet woman) what would drive him to sneak in? And you mustn't assume that he had ever been there before. There is no basis to claim that he was a movie buff. So, he's walking to the theater entrance, and he passes a door and thinks, "Maybe I can sneak in here and avoid paying"? You think that that would have been on his mind at a time like that?

My father was a policeman his whole adult life, and he used to joke to us, his sons: "If you're going to steal something, make it something big and valuable because it's just as criminal to steal something small and trivial. It's just not worth it if it's some piddly thing." And you can't say Oswald was concerned about being recognized by the ticket person because Oswald hadn't done anything. He had committed no crime. So, if you believe that, you have no reason to think that he snuck in.

One guy tried to make a big deal out of the fact that Johnny Brewer said that the guy who snuck in wore a "brown sport shirt". First, I can't see calling Oswald's arrest shirt a sport shirt. There was nothing sporty about it. And Brewer also said that it was mostly buttoned up, and Oswald's arrest shirt had almost all its buttons missing. There were just one or two left at the bottom. So, citing that is weak, and it is not bankable.

The fact is that it would have been very risky for the plotters if Oswald had walked 1.1 miles to the theater in broad daylight. Someone easily could have seen him and remembered him. So, they were not going to let him do that. They were calling the shots, and they must have arranged the ride for him.

And if Oswald had said that he walked to the theater, why not report it? But, they didn't report it, nor did they report anything he said about it. Nor did the Warren Commission ask any witness what Oswald said about it. Nor did the HSCA. Nor did the ARRB. It has been systematically dodged since Day 1.

Then, we have Earlene Roberts saying that a police car showed up at the boarding house and tapped its horn twice. And that is all we have. There is no basis to claim Oswald took a bus or cab to the theater. I have already explained why him walking there is untenable. I consider the police car being Oswald's transporation to the theater to be a strong contention, whether it was Tippit or Westbrook of someone else.

 Do you realize that Dallas Police never told us what Oswald said about what he did when he left his boarding room? They told us what he said about how he got to his room, but nothing after that. They must have asked him why he went to the theater, and he must have told them something, but they never told us. He must have told them how he got to the theater, and what time he got there, but they never told us. It's just a big void in the police record.

And then, when Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty were questioned by the Warren Commission, they were never asked what Oswald said about those things. Are you OK with that? Because: I am not OK with it. I smell a rat. I think that whatever Oswald told them must have been VERY exonerating.

First, let's consider what my friend John Armstrong says about it. He says that Oswald was driven to the theater. He says that because he talked to Butch Burroughs, the Popcorn Man, and he told John that Oswald was in the theater by 1:07. Oswald could not possibly have walked there in that amount of time. And John points out that if Oswald had walked that 1.1 miles from his boarding house to the theater, it's likely that somebody would have saw him and reported it to the Police.

So, who could have driven Oswald to the theater? John thinks it was the cop who pulled up and tapped his horn a couple times outside the boarding house, and that was according to his landlady, Earlene Roberts. And that cop may have been Tippit. And if it wasn't Tippit, maybe it was Captain Westbrook, whom John suspects was involved in the Tippit murder. The fact is: we don't have anyone else to go to but these guys. Oswald had no friends. No friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends. We can't make one up. It most likely was that cop who went to Oswald's boarding house.

Now obviously, if a cop- any cop- drove Oswald to the theater, the entire lone gunman thesis is destroyed. It means that individuals within the Dallas Police Department were involved in the plot to kill Kennedy and frame Oswald. And it explains why law enforcement dodged this whole subject.

And it makes it absolutely certain that Oswald did not shoot Tippit. If he was driven from his boarding room to the theater, then he wasn't at 10th and Patton at 1:15.

And nobody has ever provided a reason why Oswald would have been at 10th and Patton. WC Attorney David Belin was asked where Oswald was going when he was at 10th and Patton, and he said, "Mexico." The arrogance and hubris of that is amazing. Belin just pulled it from out his ass and plopped it down. That's the kind of people who comprised the Warren Commission. There is 4-letter word for them: EVIL.

This is a graphic from John Armstrong's website. At that time, there was a walkway between two of the buildings, and behind the buildings was an alley. John believes that the cop drove into the alley and let Oswald out of the police car there. Then, Oswald used the walkway between the buildings to reach Jefferson Blvd. Then, he turned right and went to the theater entrance.

This graphic from John's website I made for him. He told me waht he wanted, and I made it for him.

I don't consider myself the most knowledgable person about the Tippit shooting, but I do know that Oswald didn't kill him, and Oswald wasn't there. Oswald was never at 10th and Patton, and he had no reason to go there. Oswald was definitely in the theater when Tippit was shot. Whatever Oswald told Police about how he got from his boarding room to the theater must have completely vindicated him.

 Let's be crystal about something: the things that Marina went on to tell the Warren Commisison, after months in "protective custody" she did NOT say at the time of the assassination.

When first asked if Oswald owned a rifle, she said he used to, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia to go rabbit-hunting. Now, if she knew that he currently owned a rifle, why would she bring that up? So, it was really just another way of her saying that he didn't currently own a rifle.

When first asked if Oswald went to Mexico City, she said no, not that she was aware. But, by the time she testified to the WC, she cited things that Oswald supposedly told her about his trip to Mexico City.

When first asked about the Backyard Photos, she denied taking them. But, to the WC, she said that she did, but she was way off on the date. She said it was in February, even though the photos obvously were not taken in winter, and supposedly, Oswald didn't even order the rifle until March.

So, what is the explanation for all that? The explanation is that Marina Oswald was MK-ULTRA'd. They brainwashed her. They rehearsed her to answer the questions the way she did, and it most certainly involved mind control techniques.

The process began by severing her connection to everyone she was involved with during her time living with Oswald. And I mean everyone, including Ruth Paine. I have explained how they very cunningly took her away from Ruth Paine, by getting LIFE magazine reporters to offer to take her to Dallas on Saturday to visit Oswald at the Dallas PD. And then, without any guidance from her, instead of returning her to Ruth Paine's house WHERE SHE LIVED, they checked her into a hotel on the outskirts of Dallas, the Executor Inn. Then, they laid $200 in cash on her, and think about what that is equivalent to today. And from that point on, the Secret Service took over. You can be absolutely certain that they guarded her door all night long. Then, in the morning, they knocked. They took her and her kids out to breakfast. And they told her, point blank, that she wasn't going back to Ruth Paine's house. OSWALD WAS STILL ALIVE! Think about that. They confiscated Oswald's wife before he was even dead. How did they expect to get away with that? Because: they knew that soon he was going to be dead. The Dallas Police and the FBI killed Oswald, but the Secret Service's job was to secure Marina.

So, they sent agents to Ruth Paine's house to gather up Marina's stuff. Marina never went back there again and never laid eyes on Ruth Paine again. And I mean that over the decades that followed, they had no contact whatsoever- ever again.

So, why did they want Ruth Paine out of Marina's life? It was because even Ruth Paine grounded Marina to reality, and they didn't want Marina grounded to reality. They wanted her to live in their fantasy world with their fictitious memories of her past that they wanted to plant in her head.

The process invovled more than just psychological manipulation and indoctrination. It involved drugs. MK-ULTRA always did involve drugs:: amphetamines, LSD, mescaline, and more. And these kind of drugs often cause loss of appetite and weight loss. Here is Marina on 11/22/63 and then in February 1964 when she testified to the Warren Commission. What, did they not feed her when she was in "protective custody?" What kind of "protection" is that?

 Robert MacNeil ran into Osawld in the TSBD. MacNeil had just entered the building in search of a phone. He said it was 4 minutes after the shooting. He said he asked a young man where the phone was; the young man told him, and MacNeil raced off to use it. It was William Manchester, author of Death of a President, who found the record that Oswald said that as he was leaving the building, a blond Secret Service agent asked him for directions to the phone. MacNeil was blond, and he wore a press badge. Oswald probably mistook him for a Secret Service agent.

The stairs to the second floor were right inside the entrance to the right. Oswald used those stairs to go to and come from the 2nd loor lunchroom. So, from the doorway, he went through the double doors, then he turned right and entered the stairwell; he went up the one flight of stairs, and then he walked acorss the 2nd floor from the southeast corner to the northwest corner, where the lunch room was. He did the exact same thing in reverse going down. It must have been when he came out of the stairwell that he encountered MacNeil. And after that, he went out the door and talked to the cop who was guarding the entrance, and we see them both in the Three Tramps photo. It was 12:34 PM.

What I have been telling you is the truth: Oswald was in the doorway. Bill Shelley must have barked at him to go back inside, and Oswald must have protested. It was a commotion, and it's the reason why Dave Wiegman did his second pan of the doorway. But, Oswald did go inside; he began his trek to the lunch room. So, when Wiegman's camera captured the doorway the second time, there was no Doorman there because Oswald had left. And that's why they installed the image of the bald guy , who was as stiff and motionless as a Cigar Store Indian, in there. That is the truth.

 This one relatively clear frame from the WIegman film proves that they had the film unblurred. Remember what a film is: just a series of still frames that are sequenced rapidly. So, why is it that all of the postings of the Wiegman film are severely blurred? Such as this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAd_1X7DVso

I have made a collage, comparing the the one clear still-frame from the fllm (right) to the its counterpart in the film (left). So, why is the film so bad? They could not have made the clear still-frame unless they had a clear version of the film.

And right now, in 2026, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna is saying on television that NBC has a clear version of this film that shows that Oswald was standing outside during the shooting. GOOD FOR HER! Now, there's a politician I could vote for.

The perps had a problem with the Wiegman film: it showed Oswald standing in the doorway when he was supposed to be up on the 6th floor. And that was the primary, if not sole reason, for blurring the film.

I have been informed that the controversial documentary THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY includes an interview of Dave Wiegman. I will have to try to find it and watch it because if they included it, they must have thought it supported the "coup d'etat" thesis.

What Congresswoman Luna and I have been telling you is the truth: the Dave Wiegman film captured Oswald outside. And there is no doubt about it.

 No matter who you think Doorman was, he wasn't that cherubic bald 2nd Wiegman Doorman. He's obviously not skinny Oswald on the left, but he isn't Lovelady either.

And that vertically striped, short-sleeved shirt is what Lovelady said he wore that day, and he posed in it for the FBI, as you can see on the right. Next to him is him from the Couch film when he was walking with Shelley to the railroad yard to look around. And it's something that he said he did. It's in his testimony. Read it:

Mr. BALL - First of all, let's get you to tell us whom you left the steps with.
Mr. LOVELADY - Mr. Shelley.
Mr. BALL - Shelley and you went down how far?
Mr. LOVELADY - Well, I would say a good 75, between 75 to 100 yards to the first tracks. See how those tracks goes---
Mr. BALL - You went down the dead end on Elm?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - And down to the first tracks?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Did you see anything there?
Mr. LOVELADY - No, sir; well, just people running.
Mr. BALL - That's all?
Mr. LOVELADY - And hollerin.
Mr. BALL - How did you happen to go down there?
Mr. LOVELADY - I don't know, because everybody was running from that way and naturally, I guess---
Mr. BALL - They were running from that way or toward that way?
Mr. LOVELADY - Toward that way; everybody thought it was coming from that direction.
Mr. BALL - By the time you left the steps had Mr. Truly entered the building?
Mr. LOVELADY - As we left the steps I would say we were at least 15. maybe 25. steps away from the building. I looked back and I saw him and the policeman running into the building.
Mr. BALL - How many steps?
Mr. LOVELADY - Twenty, 25.
Mr. BALL - Steps away and you looked back and saw him enter the building?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Then you came back. How long did you stay around the railroad tracks?
Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, just a minute, maybe minute and a half.
Mr. BALL - Then what did you do?
Mr. LOVELADY - Came back right through that part where Mr. Campbell, Mr. Truly, and Mr. Shelley park their cars and I came back inside the building.
Mr. BALL - And enter from the rear?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir; sure did.
Mr. BALL - You heard the shots. And how long after that was it before Gloria Calvary came up?
Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, approximately 3 minutes, I would say.
Mr. BALL - Three minutes is a long time.
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, it's---I say approximately; I can't say because I don't have a watch; it could.
Mr. BALL - Had people started to run?
Mr. LOVELADY - Well, I couldn't say because she came up to us and we was talking to her, wasn't looking that direction at that time, but when we came off the steps--see, that entrance, you have a blind side when you go down the steps.
Mr. BALL - Right after you talked to Gloria, did you leave the steps and go toward the tracks?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - Did you run or walk?
Mr. LOVELADY - Medium trotting or fast walk.
Mr. BALL - A fast walk?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - How did you happen to turn around and see Truly and the policeman go into the building?
Mr. LOVELADY - Somebody hollered and I looked.
Mr. BALL - You turned around and looked?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes.
Mr. BALL - After you ran to the railroad tracks you came back and went in the back door of the building?
Mr. LOVELADY - Right.
Mr. BALL - Did you go in through the docks, the wide open door or did you go in the ordinary Small door?
Mr. LOVELADY - You know where we park our trucks--that door; we have a little door.
Mr. BALL - That is where you went in, that little door?
Mr. LOVELADY - That's right.

So, the two on the right are Lovelady wearing the same shirt. It's Oswald on the left. And the remaining guy, the 2nd Wiegman Doorman, is nobody. He was just put in there because Oswald left for the lunch room on Shelley's order.

 Now, I am going to show you what the Wiegman film reveals to us about what happened in that doorway. Wiegman did a second pan of the doorway, even though there was a lot happening of major consequence right ahead of him on Elm Streeet. He did that second pan because he heard or saw, through the corner of his eye, a commotion in the doorway. So, what was the commotion.

The commotion was between Bill Shelley and Oswald. Shelley placed himself in the doorway to guard it- to guard it from Oswald coming out and going out into Dealey Plaza. And Oswald did come out. It was about 12:25. Was it his decision to remain on the top platform, or did he want to venture down to the street? We don't know, but if he did try to exit the building completely, Shelley was there to stop him and did stop him.

But then, the press car came, the one with Wiegman and the other photographers, and Shelley freaked out. He could see what was happening, that Oswald was being filmed. So, he must have gone to Oswald and told him to go back inside. He probably ordered him to go to the lunch room, and that was the real reason why Oswald did it. But, Oswald must have put up some resistance. After all, he was on his lunch break. Shelley was his boss, but he had no right to tell him what to do on his off-time. So, there was a disruption in the doorway over that, and Wiegman got wind of it.

So, Wiegman did his second pan of the doorway, and by the time his camera got there, Oswald was gone. Shelley had prevailed. And be aware that this scenario I am describing fits perfectly with the timeline of Oswald and Officer Marrion Baker getting to the lunch room at about the same time. Oswald got there a few seconds before Baker. They came using completely different routes. Baker entered the building and ran to the back and took the northwest stairs up to the second floor, where he saw Oswald pass through the anteroom of the lunch room. Oswald took the elegant stairs in the southeast corner and walked across the second floor to get to the lunch room in the northwest corner.

I can't tell you the exact time that Oswald left the doorway, but it may have been before the fatal head shot. If so, it was just slightly before it. And if it wasn't slightly before it, it was slightly after it. Baker parked his motorcycle on the island which had the traffic signal at the top of Elm. He ran directly across the street, up the stairs, and Truly joined him. They ran to the back of the building; waited a little while for elevator; but when they realized it wasn't operational, they took the stairs. Truly led the way, which makes no sense since they were looking for an armed killer. Shouldn't the armed cop have led the way? But, Truly had gotten up to the 3rd floor before he realized that he had lost the officer. So, he went back down, and he joined Baker and Oswald in the lunch room.

So, Oswald left for the lunch room a little before Baker, but Baker was moving fast while Oswald was walking at a normal pace. And the result was that Oswald got to the lunch room a little before Baker. Oswald did NOT come down from the 6th floor. He came from the office side of the second floor. He walked from the southeast corner to the northwest corner across the 2nd floor, and he never made contact with the steps from the 6th floor.

And if he had come down from the 6th floor, he surely would have run into Truly, who was way ahead of Baker. So, there is NO CHANCE that Oswald came down from the 6th floor, which means that there is NO CHANCE that he shot JFK.

So, what the plotters is add a bogus Doorman to the 2nd pan of the Wiegman doorway.

Many times I have stated that the JFK motorcade films were deliberately blurred, and that includes the Wiegman film. However, even though they have never let us see the unblurred film, they have let us see unblurred frames. I am attaching one of them. It is a frame showing the 2nd Wiegman Doorman, who was nobody. He wasn't Oswald. He wasn't Lovelady. He was nobody.

This bald guy is not Oswald or Lovelady. He is a still image that was added to the film. They sped the film up so much, there is probably just one or a few frames of him. That's how they got away with putting a photo in a movie.

I have got a lot more to say about this. It is solid as a rock, I assure you. Please be patient. Contresswoman Luna is right about the Wiegman film, but she doesn't know the half of it.

 To those who support me that the man who was talking to the cop who was guarding the door appears to be Oswald, think about this: What was Oswald saying to him? He had nothing he could tell the cop about the murder because he didn't know anything. Oswald must have been talking about himself, saying that he was going to leave because they weren't going back to work. And the next thing he did was walk down the steps and walk away- right before the cop's eyes. Apparently, the cop didn't have a problem with it.

So, the whole story that Oswald snuck away is a lie. It is very likely that Oswald told the cop he was leaving.

And the whole "roll call" story is a lie too. There was never a formal roll call. This is from Chat GPT: "There was no formal TSBD roll call. Roy Truly noticed Oswald was absent from the group of warehouse employees gathered or being questioned on the first floor. That observation became the basis for telling Captain Fritz that Oswald was missing."

I think all honest persons will agree that this was no basis to conclude that Oswald was the murderer. And Oswald was not the only employee missing. Charles Givens also wasn't there. He had left. And Frazier said that he after the shooting, he went down to the basement to eat his lunch. And the cop who intereacted with Oswald at the door could have cleared the whole matter up in a jiffy.

It was just minutes before that Truly had brushed off Oswald to Baker. So, why suspect him of murder just because he wasn't observed with other workers a few minutes later?

The story stinks, and you know it. Roy Truly was CIA. The reason he brushed Oswald off to Baker is because they didn't want Oswald to be arrested at the TSBD. They wanted to get him armed and get him into the theater, where hopefully he would die in a shootout with Police. It didn't work out that way, but it almost did. It certainly could have. So, how did they get him armed and into the theater? I can partially explain that, and I will.

 This group is growing leaps and bounds, and I thank all the people who have been supporting me. But, I have also been banning people left and right because I'm not going to debate the JFK assassination with people who support the official story. If that's your spin, just go away. There are plenty of other JFK groups you can join, but you are not welcome here.

Now, I am going to talk about the Dave Wiegman film, which is the one that Congresswoman Luna has been talking about to the Media. Dave Wiegman worked for NBC, and he was in the first camera car, which was 6 vehicles behind the Presidential limo.

The first camera car was a 1964 Chevrolet Impala convertible. So, in November 1963, they had the latest model Chevy Impala., the 1964. It was provided by a Dallas Chevy dealer, Earl Hayes Chevrolet.

We know that he shot 16 mm film that was 24 frames per second, but we don't know the make and model of his camera.

But, I'll point out that there was nothing wrong with cameras then. They didn't shoot blurry footage. They had great film cameras in 1939, which was the year that The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind came out. The Dave Wiegman film is EXTREMELY blurry, and it was deliberately blurred; not while filming, but afterwards.

So, who blurred it? Our government did. I certainly don't think that NBC took it on themselves to blur it. And prior to the age of internet and Youtube, what means did people have to watch the Wiegman film? I honestly don't know.

Congresswoman Luna kept saying that NBC has the Dave Wiegman film that shows Oswald outside. But, the Dave Wiegman film is streaming on Youtube today. So, what's the difference? The difference, I presume, is that she thinks NBC has the Dave Wiegman film unblurred, which we don't have; not on Youtube or anywhere else.

The next thing is to watch at the Dave Wiegman film. There are several postings of it on Youtube. I suggest you watch this one because it is in slow-motion. However, it was put up by the Prayermanites, and I want you to know that I denounce them vociferously because they insist that Oswald WAS in the doorway but not as the Altgens Doorman or even the Wiegman Doorman. Rather, they point to a fictitious figure whom they call Prayer Man, and they say Oswald was him. I tell you that Prayer Man is fictitious, that he was nobody.

The Prayermanites are propagandists. They are noise-makers. Their mission is to make noise to distract from the fact that Oswald was the Altgens Doorman by making a preposterous counter-claim that he was somebody else who wasn't anybody. So, I denounce the Evil Prayermanites, and I ask you to shun them. However, this slow-motion video of the Dave Wiegman film, which they put up, is useful, which is why I am using it.

So, watch this extremely blurry clip from the Dave Wiegman film. What I want you to notice is that Wiegman captured the doorway when his press made the turn from Houston to Elm. At the time, Wiegman was not trying to capture the doorway. He wasn't even thinking about it. He was just riding in the car and capturing the view; whatever was in front of him.

So, his car completed the 120 degree turn from Houston to Elm and then continued down Elm. Then, Wiegman did something very signifcaint: With his camera, he swung around to his right to do a second pan of the doorway. The first pan was just incidental, but the second pan was deliberate. He made the conscious, focused decision to film that doorway a second time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Q88vpIsp4

I'm going to quit now because I want to go about this very slowly. But, I leave you with a question: Why did Wiegman shoot the doorway a second time? The answer is that he must have seen something through the corner of his eye, or heard something, or both, that propelled him to do it. And we'll talk about that next time.

 Roy Truly was in on the murder of Kennedy and the framing of Oswald. When Officer Marrion Baker (who was not in on anything) stopped Oswald in the lunch room, it was Truly who reassurred him that Oswald worked for him and couldn't be the killer. I'm sure it was the words he said and the way that he said them. Truly must have brushed Oswald off as harmless.

But then, less than half an hour later, Truly went to the Police with the information that Oswald wasn't there for the roll call. And that is insane to jump from him not being present at a roll call to being the murderer. And I'm thinking that Truly must have said more than that. He probably told Police the whole story about Oswald renouncing his American citizenship and living in the Soviet Union and marrying a Soviet woman. He must have said something to that effect because it would be insane to suspect him of murder just because he wasn't present for a roll call.

But, it shows you how corrupt Truly was, that he went from brushing Oswald off as "no way it was him" to 20 minutes later, "issue the BOLO."

 Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna of Florida is the head of the committee Trump appointed to re-examine the JFK assassination. She has been going on television, particularly Fox News, to say that NBC has got the Dave Wiegman film in a condition that shows that Oswald was standing outside during the shooting.

She is certainly right that the Wiegman film shows Oswald standing in the doorway. But, they blurred it to hell in order to obscure him. That NBC still has the unblurred version, I couldn't say. But, this is definitely Oswald in the doorway.

Even when they created the phony footage of Lovelady in a plaid shirt, which involved an imposter, not the real Lovelady, the guy did not have his shirt gaped open like Oswald, and like we see here. The only person the Wiegman Doorman can be is Oswald. And you can plainly see that there was nothing plaid about Oswald's shirt above. It was just a fine grain. It wasn't checkered like the shirt below.

And there is more of great significance about the Wiegman film that I am going to share shortly. It's the Wiegman film that tells us what exactly happened in that doorway.

 That guy at the door talking to the cop is definitely Oswald, and no one should be swayed because the government said it was 1:30 or 2:00 or 2:30, and I've heard all those times. The government lies. It lies all the time. It lies about everything. If you haven't figured that out yet, you're living behind a veil.

The funny thing is that the company line is that that person is a woman. That is ridiculous too. One of the many differences between men and women, in case you don't know, is that men tend to have square, geometric shoulders, whereas women tend to have soft, gently sloping shoulders, which adds to their femininity and charm. That person hsa got the squarest shoulders I've ever seen.

Now, his image is distorted. If you look closely, you can see that his long neck is pixellated. That happens when you enlarge an image excessively. But, his image hasn't been enlarged. He is small in the picture because he is far from the camera. So, there is no excuse for that distortion, and I'm sure it was deliberate.

Just look at the likeness between the shape of the head, the lay of the hair, the length of the neck, the slenderness. What, do you think that we live in a world of coincidences? That is not Billy Lovelady, by the way. Lovelady was inside the building at the time. So, you think there was another guy besides him who looked and dressed like Oswald? No, no, no. The likeness that we see is due to the fact that that is Oswald.

The Dallas Police were inspecting the box cars even beforre the motorcade arrived. James Jarman said that when he and Harold Norman walked down Houston Street to reach the back door of the building, that they saw police swarming the box cars in the railway yard. That was at 12:20. So, Dallas Police having custody of these three tramps at 12:34 is not a stretch.

He does look eerily like Oswald. There were only 33 employees at the TSBD. That guy had to be one of them. Why else would he be up there? So, anyone who wants to fight this needs to get the list of 33 employees and go through it. See if you can find another employee who looked like him. There was only one: Lee Harvey Oswald.

Who are you going to believe? Officialdom, or your own eyes?

 Some people want to play hardball over when the Three Tramps were paraded at the top of Dealey Plaza. One guy said it was 1:30. Oh really? Well, one search engine said this: The Three Tramp photos were taken between 2:20 and 2:30 PM on November 22, 1963.  I asked Chat GPT, and it said that there is a discrepancy, that the Portal of Texas History says 2 pm, but the Sixth Floor Museum says 2:30. Why am I not surprised.

I tell you that there is a clock in the photo that was taken in front of the Texas Book Despository, and that clock is Lee Harvey Oswald, who is in the photo. If you look closely at the man talking to the Police Officer, you can see on his left wrist the ID bracelet that Oswald wore. That is Lee Harvey Oswald, and that means the photo was taken at 12:33 or 12:34. Oswald in the photo trumps all the lies. And there is nothing more lied about than the JFK assassination.

 I shall continue with what happened after Oswald got to the doorway. Of course, he went from the doorway to the 2nd floor lunch room, and I want to discuss how and why that happened. But first, it's unfortunate that many people deny that it happened. They think it's a fabrication, a lie, and that is ridiculous because Baker said it, Truly said it, and Oswald said it. It's in the Fritz Notes that Oswald said it. So, how could they all say it if it wasn't true? It's not like Baker, Truly, and Oswald had the opportunity to conspire together to tell a lie. In fact, even just Baker and Truly could not have conspired together to lie. They didn't know each other. They didn't refer to each other by name. It was the superintendent and the officer.

It takes a lot of trust to conspire to lie with someone. Strangers don't do that. And they were strangers.

And if Oswald didn't go to the lunchroom and back, where was he for about 3 minutes? We know he was in the doorway, and I am going to discuss exactly when he left the doorway for the lunch room. But, guess what he did after going to the lunch room? He returned to the doorway,. And we have a second image of Oswald in the doorway. It's in one of the Three Tramps photos. This is Oswald, back in the doorway, 3 minutes after the first time he was captured in the doorway.

So, we know what happened. Oswald went to the lunchroom, where he had his encounter with Baker and Truly. Then he walked back down to the doorway, taking the same route he took to reach it; he walked through the office area on the 2nd floor and then down the elegant stairs in the southeast corner of the building.

And when he got back to the 1st floor, he had an encounter with Robert MacNeil, the Candian journalist who eventually became an anchor on PBS News. MacNeil asked Oswald where the pay phone was, and Oswald told him. After that, Oswald exited the building, and that is when he was captured in the Three Tramps photo.

So, it's Oswald in the upper right corner. They distorted his image. You can see how pixelated it looks, and there's no valid reason for that. Another way they cope with is to mostly crop Oswald out of it. But, it is definitely Oswald. And that means that that photo had to have been taken in the 12:33 to 12:34 window.

I know that, officially, all the Backyard photos were taken after 2 pm, but no, this photo was taken betwen 12:33 and 12:34. And the Dallas Police were manning the freight cars looking for suspicious charact ers even before the motorcade.

And let's consider the story of that photo. You see Oswald talking to a Dallas cop. But, who started the conversation? Oswald did. How do I know? It's because the officer is mostly facing straight at the doorway, while Oswald is facing the officer squarely. So, Oswald walked up to the officer, not vice versa.

What was Oswald saying to him? I can only speculate. Perhaps he was explaining why he was leaving; that it didn't look like they were going to resume working that day, so he was going to go home. I'm not even going to try to conjure up a response for the officer. The officer may have been Dallas Police Inspector J. Herbert Sawyer. Of course, he never admitted to talking to Oswald, but by the time he testified, he certainly knew what was expected of him.

And it was right after that that Oswald left Dealey Plaza on his trek back to his boarding house. Some people deny that he went there too, although he certainly did.

So, for years, I have shown you images of Oswald in the doorway during the assassination (Altgens and Wiegman) and now I have shown you an image of Oswald in the doorway a few minutes after that. Next time, I'll tell you what happened in the time between the two images.

 I know it is jolting to hear that Oswald didn’t own a rifle. But, he didn’t, and the evidence for it is strong and layered. I’m going to give you the list, and if you are an Oswald defender, it is very important that you get onboard with this.

First, Oswald said he didn’t. And if he did, and someone used his gun to shoot JFK, he would have put it that way to the police. “Yes, I own a rifle, but I didn’t shoot anyone with it. Someone else must have taken it and done it just to frame me.”  He wasn’t going to lie to the police.

Second, Marina, when first asked by Dallas Police if Oswald owned a rifle, she said that he used to but it got sold. If he currently owned one, she wouldn’t have said that. She would have referred to the rifle that he owned. But, since he didn’t own one, she wanted to give them something that pertained to a rifle.

Third, everything about the purchase of the rifle, and its odyssey afterwards, is riddled with incongruities. He supposedly played hooky from work to go to the Post Office to get the money order, but John Armstrong found his work ledger from Jaggars/Chiles/Stovall that day, and he completed 9 printing jobs during the time he was supposed to be away. The whole issue of a rifle for A. Hidell going to the P.O. Box of Lee Harvey Oswald has never been explained or resolved. Try to imagine it. He goes to the counter and says, “I’m here to get my rifle. I’m A. Hidell.”  Postal clerk: “Well, this box belongs to Lee Harvey Oswald, and you’re not listed.”  Oswald: “Well, that’s me too; it’s my other name.” And then what? He pulls out his military ID for LHO and his draft card for Alek Hidell? You think that would have resulted in them handing the rifle over to him?

I don’t believe Oswald had a P.O. Box. He never said he did. They cost money, and he was as poor as a church mouse. And he didn’t one. What for? Postal Inspector Harry Hines said that the only things that went to the P.O. Box were Russian and Socialist newspapers. Bull shit. Oswald didn’t spend money on that. And if he read Russian and Socialist newspapers, why weren’t any found in his boarding room? But, the kicker is that when he wrote his fail-safe letter to Marina, before he, supposedly, went out to shoot Walker, he told her, in Russian, that if the worst happens, she should do these 10 things right away. And first on the list was go to the P.O. Box. Why would that have been on the list at all, let alone be the first thing? The truth is that he never wrote that letter, and he never went out to shoot Walker. The plotters wrote the letter, and they put the P.O. Box first on the list to substantiate him having a P.O. Box.

The stuff that John Armstrong found about the claimed mail-order of the rifle is so wild, it’s comical. For instance, after sneaking away from work to go the post office, Oswald, for some reason, walked to a distant letter box to mail the letter. Then, the letter reached Kleine’s Sporting Goods in Chicago the very next day, even though at the time, the Post Office had no overnight delivery at any price. Read John Armstrong because it is one of the most brilliant pieces of research ever done. 

https://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html

Then, as I have told you, neither Ruth nor Marina claimed that Oswald took a rifle with him to New Orleans. Then, the rifle that never went to New Orleans could not have come back because the story that Oswald snuck it into Ruth Paine’s station wagon, just hoping that it would wind up in her garage and stay there is no credible because no one would do that. And when I say no one, I mean not one of the 8.3 billion people on Earth would do it. Nobody would do that. Oswald had friends in New Orleans. If he owned a rifle, he could have left it with one of them. And that’s what he would have done if he had owned one, which he didn’t. Ruth Paine was going to be housing and feeding his pregnant wife and his daughter. And some mother that Ruth was. She put her own two young kids in her car to sit through that long drive from Dallas to New Orleans. Then, as soon as they got there, they had to pack up the car with Marina’s stuff and drive back. What a cruel thing to do to her kids. Some people think Ruth had a sex thing for Marina, and maybe they’re right.

But, Marina must have appreciated what Ruth was doing for her. So, if Oswald said, “Let’s sneak my rifle into her car and then you sneak it in to her garage” Marina would have said Yebat tebya.  Look it up.

And what about the Michael Paine, who was the most accommodating ex-husband in the history of marriage. He let Ruth drag his kids to New Orleans and back, and return with two more mouths to feed. Can you name a single other estranged husband who let his estranged wife do that? And then the tales he told about the many times he moved the stuffed blanket around in the garage; always wondering what it was but never peeking. Was it tent poles? Other camping equipment?  A military shovel?  Who knows? His job was to pay the bills and keep everyone fed. He even did the shopping.

Supposedly, Oswald did use the rifle when he was in Dallas. He repeatedly went to the shooting range to practice, and he sometimes shot diagonally at other people’s targets, just to be an asshole. But even among lone-nutters, there is a growing community of them who admit that that whole story is a lie. Davie Reitz, whom I have communicated with, is one of them. He has admitted that it’s a lie. After all, Oswald had no car. So, how did he get to Irving for that if the rifle was stored there? How did he get the rifle out of the garage? How did he get to the range? (This was before Uber.) How did he get back to the Paine house to sneak the rifle back in the garage? And then how did he get back to Oak Cliff? And remember: Oswald, at that time, had no friends. No friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends, no friends.

And Oswald did NOT own a rifle. He said he didn’t, and he didn’t. Every Oswald defender needs to know that and proclaim it.

 I shall continue with what happened to Oswald on 11/22, but first, I want to clear things up about the claim of finding a fiber from the Oswald's blanket on the homemade bag. It is a moot question, a nonsense question, because Oswald owned no rifle. Therefore, there was no rifle to wrap in any blanket. And Oswald said he owned no rifle. And to everyone who believes in Oswald's innocence, you have to believe what he said because, being innocent, he had no reason to lie- about anything.

It is in the record that, when first asked by Dallas Police if Oswald owned a rifle, Marina said that he used to, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia to go rabbit-hunting. Obviously, she wouldn't have brought that up if he currently owned a rifle. So, she was tacitly saying the same thing that Oswald said, that he did not own a rifle in November 1963. And therefore, everything about the riffle story, including the blanket, the homemade bag, and everything else, has to be bogus.

The blanket story is preposterous even if Oswald had owned a rifle because not Oswald, and not anyone else, would sneak his rifle into the station wagon of a pacifist/gun-hater and just hope that it wound up in her garage. Oswald had friends in New Oreleans, and I am referring to Guy Bannister and his groupies. Oswald could have left the rifle with one of them- if he had one, which he didn't.

The whole story is a crock of lies and the blanket fiber fabrication is just one its many elements. Oswald had nothing to do with any rifle, with any paper, or with any blanket. It's all just a pack of lies concocted by Kennedy's real killers.

 You realize, there is no evidence that Oswald made a bag. Nobody at the TSBD saw him seizing or handling paper. Neither Frazier, nor Marina, nor Ruth saw him with any paper on Thursday night. And on Friday morning, Frazier claimed that Oswald had a grocery bag that was 2 feet long. He meant a literal grocery bag- not brown paper taped together. If you or I or anyone else had brown paper and wettable tape, no one is is going to take what we make from it for a grocery bag. The point is that no witnesses, not even Frazier, corroborated the brown paper story. Frazier did not say that the bag looked homemade, and he never said that Oswald was in possession of brown paper. So, it's just the government, in its fiat authority, claiming that Oswald built a bag from brown paper.

Frazier had to park at the distant parking lot that was several blocks away. He claimed to stay in the car for a while to run the engine to recharge the battery. So, Oswald got to and entered the building long before Frazier did. And he was seen right away by Jack Doughterty, who testified that Oswald had no long bag. Joseph Ball tried to hammer Dougherty about it, but he couldn't break him. Dougherty held firm. He was respectful, but he wouldn't budge.

But, I want to point out that paper bags fail sometimes. Even when they contain just groceries, they sometimes fail. But, jagged rifle parts? So they didn't tear the homemade bag? And when Oswald was ready to access the rifle parts, he didn't just tear the paper? Why wouldn't he? It was the most practical thing to do.

Oswald asked James Jarman about the crowd building up outside, and Jarman told him that the President was going to pass the building. So, Oswald didn't know, and that means two things: it means he could not have intended to shoot Kennedy, and it means that the people who were going to shoot Kennedy did not tell him anything about it. Oswald was completely in the dark.

When lunch time came, Oswald went to the 1st floor lunch room where he stored his lunch, and he ate there. Three of his questioners wrote that down, that he said he ate his lunch in the 1st floor lunch room, commonly known as the domino room. Those three questioners were Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty. That is where he ate his lunch, and there is no reason to doubt it. He did not eat his lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room. He never did that. That was where the office workers ate. Oswald was a warehouse worker, and the domino room is where they ate. There was also a newspaper there, which he liked to browse through as he ate.

Oswald said that Jarman and Norman were around when he was there eating, which Jarman confirmed. He said that he had bought a sandwich from a concession truck out front, and he put the sandwich on the counter in the domino room.

And then after eating his cheese sandwiches and apple, Oswald went outside to watch the motorcade. Two interrogators wrote it down: Fritz and Hosty, and we have a handwritten note by each of them. Here is Hosty's note. The note states plainly that Oswald said that after eating his lunch in the 1st floor lunch room that he went outside to watch the Presidential Parade.

And it's him in the Altgens doorway. Don't anybody spew that Lovelady shit here because I won't stand for it; I will ban you. The U.S. government killed Kennedy, and then they concocted the Lovelady story. That is the truth, and we are not debating it because it's past debating.

 Let’s look at the Thursday and Friday in Oswald’s life. On Thursday, he rode with Frazier to Irving, and supposedly, he had a wad of brown wrapping paper with him. Frazier never claimed to see it, nor did Marina and Ruth. Did Oswald hide it? How and where? Did he stuff it in his pants? I don’t’ think so. And Troy West, the mailer, never saw Oswald milling around his mailing station. There is no evidence whatsoever that Oswald took any paper from the TSBD.

That’s a problem, but claiming that he made a bag? That’s just plain stupid. I am 75 years, and I have never in my life made a bag. I’ve never had the slightest notion to make a bag. I’ve never met anyone who told me they made bag. Making bags is not something that people do, nor do they know how. What they do is wrap things in paper, and that they do often. Surely, Oswald, had he sought to contain rifle parts in paper, would have stretched out the paper, but the rifle parts on it, and then wrapped it all together. Saying that “Oswald made a bag” is just another way of saying the U.S. government killed Kennedy.

I’ve been debating this with Chat GPT, and what it tries to do is back off the “make a bag” claim as much as possible, saying that he just folded the paper in half once, put the rifle parts within and started taping. It does not refrain from denying the obvious, such as that Detective Montgomery’s bag was a manufactured one and not just paper and tape. Then, it’s preposterous that rifle parts didn’t tear the paper, and it’s equally preposterous that Oswald didn’t tear the paper deliberately to access the parts when he was ready.  Everything about the bag story is goofy.

So, why did Oswald go to Irving? That’s the wrong question. The right question is: How did he come to have $68? He hadn’t worked since July, and he was poor and struggling even when he was working. He started at the TSBD on October 16 after being unemployed for 3 months. He made $1.11/ hour, and he had to pay his living expenses and give money to Marina. So, where did he get that $68? It is mathematically impossible that he saved it up from working. He didn’t steal it, so somebody must have given it to him.  That money was central to him going to Irving. He showed it to Marina and told her that he wanted to get an apartment for the four of them. She told him she wasn’t ready. She didn’t say that she never would or that she wanted a divorce. She just said she wasn’t ready. Then, they spent the night together.

Supposedly, Oswald got up in the middle of the night to go to the garage to look for the rifle. I repeat that you can’t get the rifle to that house from New Orleans, and you can’t get the rifle from Dallas to New Orleans in the first place. But, in addition to that, you have to recognize how much noise registers at night. Floors squeak; faucets squeal; doors rattle. And we’re talking about a project, starting with finding the rifle, making the bag, and getting it all ready.

But, let’s look further at Oswald imploring Marina to move back in with him in an apartment he would get for them. Marina attested to it, and there’s no reason to doubt her. But, how do you reconcile it with him intending to kill Kennedy? In other words, how can you have both on the table? It seems like it would have to be one or the other. How could he expect to kill Kennedy and establish a new domicile for his family? He couldn’t. Oswald’s appeal to his wife, and reported by her, defies that he had any thought of killing Kennedy. And of course, he surely had no thought of shooting Kennedy because he didn’t own a rifle. He had nothing with which to shoot him.

Frazier said that he and Oswald never discussed Kennedy’s visit to Dallas. But, Oswald and Marina discussed it. She said that she told him that she wished very much that she could see the President and First Lady. You’d think that at that moment, he would have piped in the President would be passing his building. But, he didn’t, and that’s because he didn’t know. The next morning at work, when he saw people congregating on the sidewalk, he did not know why they were doing it. So, he asked James Jarman, and Jarman told him about the motorcade passing by. And that’s when Oswald found out about it. It is yet another reason why there is no way Oswald ever had any thought of shooting Kennedy. That testimony of Jarman’s is one of the most powerful in the Warren Commission, and it exonerates Oswald. Of course, the Warren Commission ignored it. To be continued.