Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Apparently, proscenium-stuffing impairs the mind, so I will have to explain the angular difference between Altgens and Hughes visually to Joseph Backes:

So, Altgens was shooting at quite an acute angle whereas Hughes was shooting almost straight into the doorway. That's the reason why it appears in Altgens that Doorman was right next to the west column, though he was, in fact, in the center of the doorway. Much of the west side of the doorway was cut off to Altgens view.

Above, it shows what part of the doorway Altgens could see and what part was cut from his view by the parallax effect. But, that was not a problem for Hughes since he was facing the doorway more squarely.

Now, Backass, drop your proscenium arch for a second and pay attention: I didn't say that Doorman wasn't moving in that Hughes clip. Of course, you can see him doing something with his arm. I didn't miss that. When I said he didn't "move" I meant that he didn't "relocate." Understand now?

Now, I realize that it looks like he relocated when we compare Hughes to Wiegman, and if that is the case, then it is Oswald who relocated. But, I have my doubts about it. Oswald was a loner. I don't see him hunkering up behind Roy Lewis. Standing in the center of the doorway, as we see him in the Wiegman film, he had nobody to his right, and he wasn't crowding anyone on his left either.

He seems to have had a very independent spot there which seems more in keeping with his character. So, I think it's very likely that this is a bogus image:

Why does Roy Lewis' shirt look grey/blue? It wasn't.

So, if what we see of Doorman in Hughes is legit, it means that Oswald relocated. But, it is not at the top of my list of possibilities. We know the Hughes film was altered. Look at this goofy image of Lovelady:

That doesn't even make sense in terms of the other images of Lovelady from that day. How can all three of these be Lovelady? Compare the shirt patterns.

My enemies have to maintain that those three shirt patterns are IDENTICAL. I'm glad I'm not them.

And, according to his own testimony, Lovelady had left the doorway for good before that image of Lovelady on the right was taken. HE WASN'T THERE AT THE TIME! 

So, like Zapruder film, and like the Wiegman film, and like the Towner film, and like the Altgens photo, the Hughes film was altered with the insertion of that goofy cartoon Lovelady where you see the yellow arrow pointing to him. Well, if they altered it to do that, maybe they altered it with the Doorman figure hovering over Roy Lewis too. But, if they didn't, then it means that Oswald relocated. It's possible. But that Doorman on the left definitely wasn't Lovelady. If he was anybody, he was Oswald. And yes, he was moving his arm.

In his testimony, Lovelady didn't say anything about moving around- relocating- during the motorcade.

Mr. BALL - You were standing on which step?
Mr. LOVELADY - It would be your top level.
Mr. BALL - The top step you were standing there?
Mr. LOVELADY - Right.

He never alludes to moving around, and he never mentions Roy Lewis as someone he was huddling with.

And you don't know what parallax is, Asshole. Parallax refers to the apparent displacement. Do you know what displacement means? To displace is to move or put something out of its proper place. Here we are talking about an apparent displacement. So, the parallax seems to have moved Doorman closer to the white column than he was.

Can you see that it looks like Doorman's right shoulder is behind the white column? It isn't. It only looks that way. It is an apparent displacement, and it's caused by the parallax.

Parallax is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight, and is measured by the angle or semi-angle of inclination between those two lines.

The two different lines of sight are Altgens' angle and a straight-on shot of someone situated squarely in front of the doorway. According to you and your idiot friend bpete, we can only use the term parallax if we have two actual photographers in two different spots. No. That is practically NEVER the case. Almost always, we are talking about just one. If we had to wait until we had two, we'd never get to use the word. In the Altgens photo, there is an apparent displacement of Doorman towards the west column OR you could say there is an apparent displacement of the west column towards Doorman. But that effect- INCLUDING THE VERY DISAPPEARANCE OF HIS RIGHT SHOULDER BEHIND THE WEST COLUMN- is due to parallax.

And if you don't like that word to describe it, what word would you like to use? What's better? He had a right shoulder, but we can't see it. How do you want to explain that? What do you want to blame it on? I blame it on the parallax. What word do you want to use to explain why Doorman's right shoulder was not visible to Altgens?

And one last thing, Backass: Prayer Man was not Oswald. Prayer Man was stocky, husky. Oswald was 5'9" 131 pounds. I'm a lot shorter, only 5'6", and I'm slender, but even I weigh 138 pounds. Oswald was damn skinny. Prayer Man was husky.

Look at the bull neck on Prayer Man. Look at the girth of his midsection. Look at his pull-over shirt or sweater. There is no way he was Oswald, and he certainly was not dressed like Oswald.  

And you've got another problem, Backass. Prayer Man was still there when Baker reached the steps.

Prayer Man was still standing there - stationary- in the doorway when Baker reached the steps on a run. So, how could Oswald beat Baker, who was a fit cop who was running, to the lunch room, and do so without being the least bit out of breath? Obviously, if Oswald was in the doorway, he had to have left well before Baker got there. Oswald had to have been gone by then. But, Prayer Man isn't gone.

And by the way, pay no attention to where it says "Frazier in white." That is just an idiotic claim of bpete and Robin Unger. That is most certainly not Wesley Frazier.

But, lo and behold, the Proscenium Stuffer, after denying for years that Oswald could have been in the doorway, has finally come around to considering it.  For some reason, he doesn't mind considering it at all- so long as it's Prayer Man who is proffered.

Well, it only proves that you're an idiot, Backes, because, for the reasons I gave, there is no chance that Prayer Man was Oswald, and there is absolute certainty that Doorman was. I give you Lee Harvey Oswald: twice.

P.S. You're a fucking idiot.