Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Robin Unger is quoting me: 

Unger, that was a reference to the woman with the boy heaped on top of her. I said that she could hold him that way for a short while- in contrast to the Altgens woman who could not and was not holding the boy next to her at all. 

On the left; the boy is heaped up on top of her, where she is leaning one way and he is leaning the other creating a counterbalance, and her arm is doing very little of the work. On the right, the boy isn't on top of the woman at all; he is next to her. They are on completely separate, unrelated gravitational tracks with no counterbalance at all, which means that, even theoretically, all she could be using to support him would be the strength of one arm. She couldn't do it- even for a short while- and if she tried to do it, it would look very different from what we are seeing. 

Even Hank Sienzant, who is a paid, full-time Op, admitted that the boy is standing on something, and he suggested a car bumper. That is ridiculous, but at least he admitted the boy is standing- and he is. 

NOBODY is holding that Altgens kid. He is standing. And you are a blithering idiot, and so is the gang of nasty little rogues who cheer you on. YOU'RE MORONS! ON THE RIGHT, THERE IS NO LIFTING GOING ON!