Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This link is very valuable because it enables you rifle through front pages of newspapers from 11/22/63 from the comfort of your own home. 

http://www.chron.com/news/slideshow/JFK-assassination-front-pages-from-1963-74566.php

You'll see that the Stamford Advocate features the LBJ swearing in photo from the plane. Well, that was taken around 2:45 Central, so 3:45 Eastern. Then, the picture had to be taken somewhere, developed, and then put on the wire. Then, it had to be retrieved by the paper on the other end, processed (remove the coding, etc.) and then fitted into the paper along with the caption and article and everything else. In other words, they had to lay it out. So, how long did it all take? But, the Altgens6 photo was taken at 12:30, and if it was wired to the world at 1:03, wouldn't they have used it? 

Of the 28 papers shown from all over the country, east coast to west, guess how many of them featured the Altgens6 photo? Zero. 

Now, I know that there are a few that did publish it on 11/22, that is, if they're not fake. However, the ocean of papers that did NOT publish it matter more than the few that did. Much more. There is no excuse for there not being many. And it makes the few very suspect.


The preponderance of the evidence shows that the Altgens6 photo was unavailable on 11/22. A paper NOT publishing it is as significant and demonstrative as a paper publishing it. Mathematically, the scale is weighted down heavily on the side of Altgens6 unavailability on 11/22/63.