Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, I've got another view, and I drew the lines the same way.

Look: we know that the median handrail was in the center of the doorway, which means that if you took the picture from squarely in front of the doorway, the width of the east and west sides would be exactly the same- in real life if you measured it and in the picture.

Now, when you shift to taking the picture from an angular view, you obviously don't change anything in real life, but you change the relative widths, such that the open side, which is opposite from the side you're shooting from, will have greater width. So, in this case, the photographer was to the east, the open side was to the west, and the width should be greater on the west side as well, as it is in the Willis frame. 

Let's try it again. Here is another angular shot. This time, it's taken from the west side, therefore, the east wall is the open wall, the one that's visualized in the picture.

 So, from whatever side you photograph from, the opposite wall gets captured, the wall on your side gets cut-off. In this case, the medial handrail is gone, but there are still marks in the concrete from where it was. We are using those marks as a proxy for the railing. The distance from the median railing to the side railing is greater on the open side than the cut-off side, just like in Willis' frame. It's just the reverse of it. 

But in the Darnell frame, the open side is associated with the shorter span. 

Backes, you are way too fucking stupid to grasp a thing like this. You're a moron. But, I know there are others who can see it. The right side of the doorway appears wider than the left. But, the right side is also the cut-off side. In other words, the photographer stepped to the right, which cut off the right side. It made the right column block more of the image. So, that side of the doorway should be narrower. But instead, it's wider. It's cut-off but wider. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Do you want me to get a Physics professor involved again?