All the federal secret agencies, the CIA, FBI, and SS, were involved in killing Oswald, as I'll explain.

As for the CIA, their job was to MK-ULTRA Ruby. We don't know who Ruby's Dallas doctor was, but we do know that he had Ruby on amphetamines, supposedly, for weight loss. That wasn't a standard medical practice even then. Then, after the spectacle, it was their Dr. Louis Joylan West, the "Maestro of Mind Control," who treated Ruby.

And I'm sure it involved more than just drugs. Ruby's "respect" for the Dallas Police, if you want to call it that, went over the top. But, they knew they needed it because the Dallas Police were going to tell Ruby that he shot Oswald, when he didn't, and they needed him to be totally submissive to them. And I mean in a Manchurian candidate way.

I suspect that the conditioning of Ruby to play the role he ultimately played started long before the assassination. But, I admit there is a lot I don't know.

The FBI was involved in the killing of Oswald because they provided James Bookhout to masquerade as Ruby. But, I dare say they also provided James Hosty to masquerade as Blackie Harrison. And, I know why Blackie wasn't available. It was because he was busy processing Ruby up on the 5th floor. If you read his testimony, you'll learn a lot. And note that Blackie was another one who showed up a Nervous Nellie with a lawyer at his side.

But, here is Leonid Brezhnev and James Hosty, and it's a match.

They probably did little things with paint to distinguish Leonid on the left. Still, that is the same guy. They may have been covering up Hosty's flabby neck with the Groucho Marx imitation.

Then, there was the Secret Service, which did two things. They provided Forrest Sorrell, who was the top SS agent in Dallas, to mind Ruby during the Spectacle. And, they had several SS agents take control of Marina Oswald.

Recall the story of the generous LIFE magazine reporters who transported Marina to Dallas to visit Oswald, with a stop at their hotel suite first, which was at the Adolphus Hotel. And they went back there after the visit. But then, they decided that there were too many reporters there, so they had better move her to a quiet hotel on the outskirts of Dallas, the Executive Inn.

WHAT THE MOTHERFOLK???? Marina had a home. She lived with Ruth Paine. Why didn't they just take her home? And why did they think that they could get away with just saying that they took her to a hotel for no reason? And once they moved her into that hotel, the LIFE reporters left. That's when they turned the mission over to the Secret Service, who guarded the hotel all night and came knocking the next morning to put Marina under their total control. There wasn't even any discussion of returning her to Ruth Paine's house. They wouldn't even let her go there to get her stuff. They agreed to let her give them a list of stuff for an agent to go over there and get. She couldn't go there. They wouldn't allow that.

And all this went down BEFORE Oswald was killed. The Secret Service took possession of Marina BEFORE Oswald was shot.

Then, they were involved in faking her visit to Parkland Hospital to see Oswald's dead body. Marina NEVER said that she did that. You only have to read her WC testimony, and you'll see that she went from the Executive Inn to the home of Chief Curry, and then after she was told that Oswald had died, she was taken to the Inn of the Six Flags. She was not taken to Parkland Hospital that day, although they shot some footage of it later. This is a photo of Marina supposedly walking into Parkland Hospital with SS agents behind her on 11/24/63. That child wearing jeans and sneakers is supposed to be her daughter June, who was 17 months old.

Does that kid on the inside of Marina look like she's 17 months old? She's looks like she could be playing AYSO soccer. And Marguerite is not holding newborn Rachel. Babies have to breathe, and nobody would bound a baby like it was stuffed in a pretzel can and deprive it of oxygen. You don't see any baby because there was no baby. This was another photo-op, but very stupidly done.

And of course, LBJ was also involved in the Oswald shooting because he, no doubt, put the Dallas Police up to doing it. Those detectives were all ex-military, including Fritz himself, and this was a mission that their Commander in Chief gave them, to kill Oswald.

So, basically, the U.S. federal government, with the help of the Dallas Police, killed Oswald. Why? It's because the U.S. federal government killed Kennedy. Ruby was just a patsy, and he was not in the garage at the time. He was already tucked away on the 5th floor, until it was time to slip him into the story and complete the bait and switch. That is what happened. And there is no denying it

On the left are newlyweds who are holding hands, and the mechanics of what the young husband is doing with his left arm and hand are very similar to what Leavelle is supposed to be doing with Oswald.

And notice that on the young husband we can see his upper arm, then a slight bend in his elbow, and then his forearm coming down. It's all there without any weird stuff.

That's normal. That's real life. What we're seeing in the Jackson photo, with the weird indentation below Leavelle's shoulder, and then a separate and independent appendage coming out of nowhere with no relation to the rest of him, that is NOT real life. That is JFK land, which is filled with images like this. There is no valid reason why Leavelle's arm should look so freaky. It should look pretty much the same as the young man's.

And to my adversaries, I don't care about your lip-flapping. You can keep your lame excuses to yourself. If you think that Leavelle in the Jackson photo is legitimate, then get your phone or camera out and duplicate it. That is the only thing that will have any say. And I will take the liberty to hide any inane comments, which is an option I have. You'll still see your comment and so will people who are friends with you. But, no one else will see it.

 This is another recreation of Leavelle with his hand in Oswald's pants. Since a man's arm is longer than the belt-level of a man's pants, it means the elbow has to be bent. And you can see that my elbow is bent, as I pretend to do it. There is no weird crease or fold between my shoulder and my elbow. But, on Leavelle, there is, and it isn't normal.

But, you should also compare the length of Leavelle's two arms. Can you see that his right arm, which is on our left, is much longer than his left arm? And that is one thing that is symmetrical about men: the length of their arms.

No one else who tried to duplicate Leavelle's left arm could do any better. It is a monstrosity.

Hear me when I tell you that Jack Ruby was innocent, and the Dallas Police framed him and killed Oswald. And they got away with it for 50 years.

If you look at James Bookhout's obituary, you'll see that no photograph of him was included.

https://obits.dallasnews.com/us/obituaries/dallasmorningnews/name/james-bookhout-obituary?id=24232344

I'm sure that was on his order. And I have no doubt that he died a peaceful man, content in the belief that he got away with what he did. And I don't say that he shot Oswald. He was just an actor. Oswald was shot afterwards, and not by Bookhout.

Still, he was part of the process of killing Oswald. He was an accessory to murder. And if there is life after death, I hope he's feeling the heat right now, knowing that he didn't get away with it. He died in 2009, and it was 4 years later that Maxim Irkutsk posted his video on Youtube that Jack Ruby did not kill Lee Harvey Oswald.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh3zvoj9HVc

It's got 9700 views. Please help me get it up to 10,000.

 The bullet entered Oswald's body at the 7th rib, and it came to rest under the skin at the 11th rib. So, it almost traversed him. To extract the bullet, a Parkland doctor just lanced the skin over the 11th rib, and it fell out.

But, the 11th rib is, obviously, lower than the 7th rib. The 1st rib is the highest one, and the 12th rib is the lowest one. That means that the bullet had a downward trajectory.

This is the Shooter at the instant he shot. Does it look like a downward trajectory to you?

 On the left, I have a very tight grip on the gun. And you need a tight grip because the less the gun moves, the better. My index finger is not just there to squeeze the trigger. It is also gripping the gun on the right side.

In the middle, I have my middle finger on the trigger and my index finger is extended along the barrel. But, even though I am a small man with a small hand, my index finger still reaches the cylinder gap, where the burning hot gases come out. So, I'd be crazy to fire the gun that way. Plus, I can't have my index finger on the barrel because the barrel has to rotate freely. How's it going to do that if my index finger is on it?

So, the only way I could fire it with my middle finger on the trigger is what you see on the right. But, that is both awkward and insecure, and it feels terrible. My index finger isn't gripping the gun on the right side, and neither is my middle finger.

So, there is no right away to fire this gun with your middle finger.

And I'm sure the same is true for the Colt Cobra that Jack Ruby had.

There is zero chance that Jack Ruby was the one pulling the trigger with his middle finger. He would not have done that for any reason. There is no scenario by which he would have done it. You can't even conjure one up. It is completely and totally implausible. And it's one more proof that the Shooter was NOT Jack Ruby.

 This is me poised to shoot with my index finger on the trigger (left) and my middle finger (right). With my index finger, it feels like my hand fits the gun like a glove. It feels very snug and secure, with no play at all. Using my middle finger, I only have two fingers, my ring finger and pinkie, wrapped around the grip in front, which makes the grip a lot weaker.

But, there's something else that you can't see. When I use my index finger, it wraps the other side of the grip and holds it tightly. It's not just serving the purpose of pulling the trigger. It is gripping the right side of the gun. But, I don't get that effect when I use my middle finger. My index finger is just protruding forward into the cylinder zone, and my middle finger isn't gripping the gun either. I have nothing on that side of the gun that's really holding it tightly. There is no squeeze on it. I'll show you shortly.

The point is that Jack Ruby had an intact right hand, and both instinctively and deliberately, if he thought about it, he would have used his index finger on the trigger. Every small boy playing cops and robbers knows that the index finger is the trigger finger. You can't dream up a reason why Ruby would have done otherwise. And it's just another reason why that shooter in the Jackson photo cannot be Jack Ruby.

 It was Ruby's left index finger that was partically amputated. So, there was no need and no excuse for him to shoot with his right middle finger. It wasn't him. The problem was that Boohout got the wrong information. Someone mistakenly told him that it was Ruby's right index finger that was snipped, and that's why Bookhout used his middle finger. It's called a production error. Every movie has got them. All except Dovey's Promise. So, watch it.

This is me duplicating Oswald's configuration in the Jackson photo. I have slapped my left arm and hand to my chest. I arched my hand some, since he did that. And I snugged my thumb up to my fingers as much as I could. But, notice that my thumb doesn't extend as far because you can't extend it as far. And you can't turn the thumb like that either. You don't have a muscle that can do it. Nor do you have a joint that can do it. And you can't turn your thumb that way even with your other hand. It just can't do it.

I have also jutted my right hand forward, supinating it, as Oswald appears to be doing. But, notice that on me, we're seeing the pad of my thumb, not the dorsal side of it. And instead of having a freaky finger parallel to my thumb, I have a normal index finger that is opposed to my thumb. It isn't parallel to it, like we see on Oswald.

The Jackson photo is monstrously fraudulent. It is a freak show. And it's the medical profession that should have been screaming bloody murder upon seeing it, from knowing about human anatomy and kinesiology.

 Here is me recreating Leavelle holding Oswald by the pants. What you see on me is the natural flow of my arm as well as the jacket sleeve. That weird configuration on Leavelle is impossible.

Now, if you think otherwise, then you get out your phone and take a picture that duplicates it. I dare you. And I'll tell you right now that it's impossible. It isn't photography. It's art.

 

Let's look at the center of the Jackson photo. On the left, we see an impossible fold in Leavelle's sleeve because his arm couldn't do that. He had an elbow, but it wasn't way up there. There is nothing that could cause such a fold way up there. There is no other image like it. The entire appendage below the arrow is fake.

The thumb of Oswald's slapped hand is the wrong thumb. It is a right thumb, not a left thumb. That is two hands there: the fingers of a left hand and the thumb of a right hand. You couldn't possibly turn your left thumb as much as that. It is two hands, like two hands clasped in prayer.

The other thumb is wrong too. Oswald has his right hand supinated, or you could say, internally rotated, which turns the pads up and the nails down. So, the nail side of his thumb shouldn't be up there, but it is. You couldn't duplicate it. And what is that weird finger next to the thumb? Is that supposed to be his index finger? The whole hand is a monstrosity.

To the Shooter they gave an extra thumb. That big long thumb we see on top of his fist is fake. They added it. His real thumb was folded down. So, why did they add the fake, overly long thumb, with a ridiculously long proximal phalange? It was because James Bookhout had small hands, and they were afraid that his small hand would be noticeable as not being Ruby's, whose hands were larger. So, to enlarge Bookhout's hand, they gave him an extra thumb.

And finally, why is the Shooter pulling the trigger with his middle finger? And why would Jack Ruby, of all people, do that? I know why James Bookhout did it. It was because somebody mistakenly told him that Ruby had a severed right index finger. He did not. He had a severed left index finger. So, Ruby would have had no reason to use his middle finger.

And remember that when you use your middle finger, it means that your index finger is going to go right alongside the cylinder. Well, you know about the cylinder gap, don't you? That's where burning hot gases come out. The first thing they teach you at gun safety class is that you don't put any part of your hand in front of that cylinder.

So, that Shooter certainly wasn't Jack Ruby, and he certainly didn't fire any gun there.

Look: it's over. The damn thing was staged. It was a dog and pony show. Oswald was NOT shot in the garage. It was all theater. And Jack Ruby was already being held on the 5th floor to be slipped into the story later in a class bait and switch. That is what happened on November 24, 1963, and we need to start admitting it.

 You may be aware that I have a movie coming out on New Year's Day called DOVEY'S PROMISE. It's a true story with a JFK connection; a courtroom drama about the Towpath Murder Trial of 1965 in which the victim was Mary Pinchot Meyer, who was JFK's last mistress. She was murdered in Towpath Park in Georgetown, eleven months after he was.

Her attacker grabbed from behind and grappled with her. Then he took his gun out and shot her in the head. Then, he let her go because he expected her to fall to the ground. But, even though she had a bullet lodged in her brain, she took off and went 24 feet before collapsing. Then, he went and took her by the arms and dragged her back to where it began. And then, he took his gun out again and shot her in the back. And he angled the shot, so that it would hit her aorta. And she died instantly from that.

And it has a parallel to the Oswald assassination because his shot ruptured his aorta too. He didn't die instantly like she did, but by the time he reached the hospital, he was, for all practical purposes, dead. He was about as dead as Kennedy was when he reached the hospital, which was pretty dead.

Oswald was completely exsanguinated. He had lost all his blood. Parkland doctors transfused 6 liters of blood into him. The body only has about 5 liters. So, it was more than a full body supply.

They also starting using hemostats and electrocautery to stop the new blood from bleeding out. And they did succeed in restoring some blood pressure to him. He didn't have any when he arrived. But, then his heart starting failing. He went into cardiac arrest. His heart couldn't pump that new blood because it was already irreversibly damaged from its own lack of blood. They tried massaging his heart. But, after a while, they realized it was futile, and they declared him dead.

But, like Kennedy, Oswald was dead on arrival. Even a chicken will run around with its head cut off for a while, but it's dead. Sometimes a body can still have some manifestations of life, even though it is hopelessly dead and shutting down. It just hasn't turned all the lights out yet, and that was true of both Kennedy and Oswald. Both were DOA.,

So, the bullet severed Oswld's aorta and vena cava, and that meant that he had a fountain of blood spurting inside of him. And the only thing he should have done after being shot that way is collapse.

So, Oswald slapping his left arm to his chest, like King Kong, in the Jackson photo is a contrivance . We see it there, but we don't see it in any of the films. They did that just to cover up the area so that the absence of trauma could be explained. That photo was taken at a photo-shoot an hour before, and there was no shooting.

But, I hope you'll take this as a reminder about DOVEY'S PROMISE because it really is a great courtrooom drama- the best since A FEW GOOD MEN. And, I assure you there is no better way for you to start the new year than by watching this great film. You can watch the trailer here:

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/dovey

 If you are wondering why the phony arm on Leavelle, with his hand in Oswald's pants, and why the phony arm on Oswald being slapped to his chest, with the humongous freako hand, it's all because this was supposed to be taken after the shot. However, there was no shot because it was taken at a photo-shoot before the Garage Spectacle. And since there was no shot, Oswald wasn't traumatized, and neither was his clothing.

So, that meant that they had to cover up the entire area. "Nothing to see here, folks." It's all covered up. So, no blood, no wound, no torn clothing, no nothing. Anything and everything that could possibly have been affected by the shot is covered up.

So, the fact that you don't see the slightest sign of any trauma is because there wasn't any trauma, and they covered up the whole area with arms akimbo.

So, that's how they came up with the idea to have Leavelle with his hand in Oswald's pants. No police officer would ever do that, and no police officer has ever done it. And Oswald certainly wouldn't stand for it. Recall what happened in the Texas Theater when Officer McDonald made a move for Oswald's pants to get his pistol. Oswald slugged him in the nose. Of course, McDonald returned the favor, slugging Oswald in the eye.

But, this weird arrangement at the core of the Jackson photo is due entirely to there being no shot and no trauma and having to cover up the whole area of impact.

 If you watch this NBC footage of the Oswald shooting, you will notice several things, and this is in the order that they occur.  

1. The arm of Jim Leavelle with his hand in Oswald's pants is fake. You can see that it looks ridiculous. His forearm isn't even anatomical; it curves. No one could do that with their forearm. If you tried to reproduce it, you'd find out that it's impossible.

That ain't real, folks. And by the way, I outsmarted them.  NBC made it impossible to do a screen-save, so I just took a picture of it with my cell phone. 

2. The muzzle blast is very weak. For a snub-nosed revolver in a small, confined space with walls on three sides? It could easily cause permanent tinnitus. 

3. There is no muzzle flash. 

4. Considering that it was a contact shot or nearly so, shouldn't Oswald's sweater have been burnt? 

5. Notice that Oswald goes down way too fast. It's like a vacuum the way he falls to the ground. It's like: Whoosh! and he's gone. 

6. The voice of Tom Petit has the wrong affect. He's talking about Oswald being shot with the affect of a baseball anouncer at a slow game. "There's a high fly to right field. Reggie Jackson is underneath it. And that makes it one out." 

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/nbc-5-archives-footage-of-lee-harvey-oswald-being-shot-by-jack-ruby_dallas-fort-worth/207417/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2Y3vMamGq8r35fgWL31SL_qyWHo8P-WuCymeaIZvDtycY2vOholrQAggk_aem_0QzPehsJSbMh3SzRuU4lMA

  Look at this ridiculous Jackson photo. It's supposed to be after the shot. So, a shot just went off in that small, cramped space. It was practically like shooting a gun inside. That's how loud it was. Then Oswald audibly groaned, and he apparently slapped his arm to his chest (not really, but that's what the photo shows).

So, how could Detective Roy Lowery (on the left, next to the wall) still be clasping his hands in front after all that? And he told the Warren Commission that he saw everything, that he saw and recognized Jack Ruby standing there, that he saw the gun, and he saw him make his move. And that all happened before the shot went off. Yet, after the shot, he is still standing there, relaxed, with his hands clasped in front of his body?

Even Will Fritz is reacting. His arms are going up. It's pretty fake looking, but at least it's something. So, why isn't Lowery reacting, both as a cop, and as a human being with a startle reaction? But, there isn't one person in the whole photo exhibiting a startle reaction.

What about the guy on the far right who is supposed to be Detective Blackie Harrison? He's not Harrison. He's actually Leonid Brezhnev. Just kidding of course, but he looks more like Brezhnev than he does Harrison. But, he's supposed to be reaching for the Shooter's gun. While smoking a cigar? And doting on it with a gesture like Groucho Marx?

NBC reporter Tom Petit is on the right in the white trench coat. He's not reacting either. He doesn't look the least bit stressed or startled, even though a shot just happened. Shouldn't he be shocked and stunned?

Jim Leavelle in his Easter suit said the same thing as Lowery, that he saw and recognized Ruby on the side and saw the gun and saw him coming in. He said that he jerked Oswald behind him to protect him, but you can see that Oswald is not behind him. He said that he thumped Ruby on his left shoulder with his right hand, but that was a lie too. He never did that. But, since he saw the Shooter in advance and was aware of what was happening, doesn't it seem like he should have responded by now?

I'll mention just one more guy: the cop in the white hat in the far back. Notice that he seems to be looking directly at us. He's not looking at the action in front of him. He's looking through that at us. The reason he seems to be looking at us is because he was looking at the camera. Our view and the camera's view are one and the same. Therefore, since he was looking directly at the camera, it seems like he is looking at us. But, he was a cop too. He must have heard the shot. So, why isn't he going into action to respond?

This photo is preposterous. It was staged, and I mean before the televised spectacle. And we know how they did it. Just read the testimony of Dr. Fred Bieberdorf. He said that at 9:45, they cleared out the garage. All the reporters and cameramen were told they had to leave. They were told that they could wait in the press room on the 3rd floor. And they didn't let them back into the garage until 10 minutes before the jail transfer. It happened at 11:20, so that would mean 11:10. So, that's an hour and 25 minutes. And what they did during that time was first: grab Ruby. He showed up about 10:20. He sent his money wire at 10:17. That's what he told the Warren Commission. They hustled him up to the 5th floor, and they had to settle him there. I know that two of the detectives who were involved in that were Thomas McMillan and Blackie Harrison. And that's why they had to recruit Leonid to fill in for Blackie in the Jackson photo.

So, while Ruby was being handled on the 5th floor, and it may have taken some convincing to get him to accept that he shot Oswald, the others took their iconic photos in the garage. And the reason they had Leonid smoke a cigar was to cover the lower part of his face. Someone must have thought that there was something weird about his chin area, and that it needed to be covered up for him to pass as Blackie. So, that's the idea they came up with.

Hey, I'm a filmmaker, and I know very well that sometimes, you have to make sudden decisions to cope with unexpected problems. And there are always unexpected problems.

So, here's what I think happened: Blackie was up tending to Ruby when they shot this. Afterwards, they informed him that they had to have Leonid smoke a cigar to cover his chin. Therefore, Blackie had to smoke a cigar. So, even during the melee', he continued smoking his cigar.

You know that in an emergency, with the need to subdue a violent criminal before he kills again, a cop is going to ditch his cigarette or cigar. As he's moving in, with one of his hands, he will dash it to the ground. He's not going to keep smoking at a time like that. But, in this case, they had to tie Blackie to Leonid, so they told him to smoke and keep smoking.

So, who was Leonid? He may have been Jim Hosty. And if so, that would put two FBI agents in the garage: James Bookhout and James Hosty.

This ridiculous photo won the Pulitzer Prize, and that is crazy. It's a farce! I attribute it to the fiat power of the State. Fiat is from the Latin: "to let it be done." Think of Yul Brenner in THE KING AND I: "So let it be written; so let it be done."

 

This is how men's hair looks in back, all but the Garage Shooter, who is wearing a wig. And if he weren't wearing a wig, it would take a long time of primping and designing to get his real hair to look like that. Jack Ruby never did that. Why would he, when he had very little hair? Why would he get artsy about his hairline in back?

And notice that the other guys in the photo had actual necks. Jack Ruby had one too. But, the Garage Shooter was practically neckless. It was like his head was plopped on his shoulders.

There isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that guy was Jack Ruby. The deception is over! The Garage Shooting was staged, and they already had Ruby tucked away upstairs on the 5th floor. And several hours later, they coyly inserted him into the story, bringing him down to the 3rd floor to display him to reporters and cameramen. And poor Ruby was so gone mentally from the drugging and the manipulation that he was in a maze and a daze of confusion and helplessness.

People fell for it in 1963, but this is 2025. There's no excuse to fall for it today. They needed Oswald dead because the case against him was such a pack of lies that they couldn't let him see a lawyer- not even once. They had to get him dead before he spoke to a lawyer because that lawyer would have been infused with the knowledge that Oswald was framed and innocent. One short session with him is all it would have taken. They needed to permanently silence Oswald. And they did; law enforcement did. Ruby was just their helpless patsy, whose mental faculties were so weak, and whose pathological respect for authority was so great, that he was helpless to stand up to them.

So, who did it? The leading actors were the Dallas Police. It was their show. And I'm sure it was one of them who put the bullet into Oswald, possibly Officer RC Nelson, who was Tippit's partner, who was there. But, it also invovled the FBI, since James Bookhout, the star of the show, was an FBI agent. It also involved the Secret Service because it was SS Agent Forest Sorrels who minded Ruby up on the 5th floor while the Dallas Police were busy with the spectacle. And, while that was happening , other Secret Service agents were busy rounding up Marina, which they started doing BEFORE Oswald was killed. They finagled her out of Ruth Paine's house on Saturday and had her planted in a motel on the outskirts of Dallas, the Executive Inn, that night. I'm sure they guarded it all night. The next morning, they took possession of her bright and early- before Oswald was shot. She was already in the Secret Service custody when Oswald was shot.

But, the prime-mover behind the whole thing had to be Lyndon Baines Johnson.

It's been 61 years of lies, and it's time for the truth.

 Fritz was in the ridiculous Jail Transfer procession, which had everything but the Pomp and Circumsance music (DAH....dah-dah-dah...Dah-Dah) and then he turns around and nods at the trio of Leavelle, Oswald, and Graves. I've put together this collage in which you can plainly see the nod.

Then, Detective Thomas McMillan also turned around and nodded. Didn't they know that talent isn't supposed to do that, especially when the camera is rolling? It's something that crew does, not the actors. I'm a filmmaker. I know.

 Look at this Willis photo. It was taken right before JFK was shot in the throat. He was already shot in the back with the ice bullet. And he's not waving at the spectators. Why? It's because he was shot in the back, and massive changes were taking place in his body that were disabling. He wasn't the same man. He was completely in the throes of the nerve agent.

But, that's not what I want to talk about. What I want to talk about is: WHY AREN'T THE SPECTATORS WAVING AT HIM?

Look at the people beneath the freeway sign. Not one of them is waving at him. What happened to all the excitement of people waving at the President? So, did they have a sense that something was wrong? Maybe, but there is another possibility, which is that those people weren't there.

I have written about the Willis photo before. I pointed out that Umbrella Man's umbrella is too small. It looks more like the size of a Japanese parasol. I don't think it's a legitimate image.

But, let's remember that they could have started shooting JFK much sooner. They could have shot him when he was on Houston Street. So, why didn't they? It's because there were too many people there. They didn't want that many eyes on it. The Kill Zone started at the freeway sign. And they made sure it was only lightly populated down there, so that there would be few eyes on it.

According to Officaldom, nothing has happened to JFK yet in the Willis photo. He hasn't been hit at all yet, according to them. So, why would he have stopped waving? He wouldn't have.

Now, I don't trust that image of JFK in the Willis photo. It doesn't look photographic to me. It may be have been painted, replacing what was there.. But, I know for sure that he wasn't waving. And that's because he had already stopped waviing. He wasn't waving in the Croft photo, which came long before. And he wasn't waving in the Betzner photo either. So, he had long ago stopped waving. And if some of those people were added, they may have avoided putting in wavers because he wasn't waving. They may have thought that it would look odd if there were hands outstretched waving at him, and he wasn't responding. It would highlight that there was something wrong with him. So instead, they gave us the non-waving President and the non-waving spectators, even though, supposedly, nothing has happened yet.

But, there is one more thing that is very significant. Notice that Jackie is turned and looking at her husband. SO, SHE HAS STOPPED WAVING AND INTERACTING WITH SPECTATORS TOO. She knows that something is wrrong with him. He's got a weird look on his face. She described it to the Warren Commission as a "quizzical look."

There isn't anybody waving in the Willis photo. When you put it all together, you realize that something terribly wrong has happened already. And the story that he hasn't been hit yet is a lie.

 To those who recognize that the Single Bullet Theory is complete, utter nonsense, you’re right. But granting that, what happened instead? Once you drop the SBT, what does it default to? And how do we find out?

We find out by starting with what the autopsy doctors found. We can’t go to the Parkland doctors because they missed it completely.

In his summary, Humes said there was a 7 x 4 mm oval entrance wound in the upper right posterior thorax. He provided measurements of its location from the mastoid process and from tip of the right acromion process of the scapula. But, the anatomical landmark he needed to use for reference was the spine. So, why didn’t he locate it as per distance from the spine?

But fortunately, other doctors present did so, and they all said it was adjacent to T3.  All but one, that is; the exception saying it was next to T4.

Humes said that the angle of entry was 45 to 60 degrees. That is impossible because it would have meant the shot was taken from a helicopter. The angle from the 6^th floor was only 18 degrees. Humes probed the wound with his pinkie, and other doctors did too. It appeared to be shallow and end abruptly. Military officers would not let them dissect the wound.

When it was found out the next day that there had been a wound in his throat, it was decided that it must have been one continuous wound. But, they still had JFK’s body, so why didn’t they go back and confirm it?

But, never mind all that. What matters is that a shallow wound in JFK’s back is all they found. And there is no reason to think it was anything but that.

But, why wasn’t there a bullet in the wound? Some have said that it fell out, but absolutely not. The only way it could have fallen out was to go back out through the holes made in 3 layers of clothing, and that is impossible. But, two persons claimed that that’s what happened. One was a friend of the driver of the Secret Service car, Sam Kinney. After Kinney died, this friend said that Kinney told him that he found the bullet on the floor of the limo and that he put it on the stretcher. Later, the same claim was made by SS Agent Paul Landis, except he said he found the bullet stuck in the back of the limo seat.

We need to dismiss these lies because they are just part of the evil of the JFK assassination. There is no chance that either of them is true.

However, there is another theory that preceded either one of them. It is that the back bullet was removed at the “pre-autopsy.” David Lifton alleged it. But no, that isn’t true either, and for multiple reasons.

First, if the back wound had been tampered with, the autopsy doctors would have recognized it. Digging a bullet out of the body isn’t easy. You have to get forceps around the bullet and yank it out. And that tears and disrupts the tissue. They saw no signs of that.

But, the whole idea that there was a metal bullet lodged in there is absurd and impossible. The bullets form the Carcano rifle had a flight speed of 2000 feet per second.  If one struck him in the back at that speed and then came to rest in an inch and a half, that rate of deceleration would have been impossible. There is a lot of energy in a bullet traveling 2000 feet per second, which has to be dissipated before the bullet can stop. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. That’s Newton’s Third Law of Motion, and it applies. The bullet would act on the body, and the body would act on the bullet. And all that energy would have been taken out on both. A bullet stopping that fast would get severely deformed, and JFK’s back would get severely traumatized. That did NOT happen.

So, what did happen? What happened is that JFK was not shot in the back with a metal bullet. He was shot in the back with an ice bullet. And the reason the bullet didn’t go very far inside him is because it was ice.

Ice is hard, but it is also unstable.  “Ice shatters easily because when it experiences a rapid temperature change, the outer layer warms and expands faster than the inner layer, creating internal stress that causes cracks to form and spread quickly, essentially shattering the ice due to this ‘thermal shock’ phenomenon.”

Also: “Excessive minerals in the water cause ‘grain boundary cracks’ – where there are so many grains in the ice that it finds it easier to fracture than expand. Oxygen in the water similarly creates weak spots in the ice.”

Also, there is the fact that: “Hydrogen bonding in ice causes it to expand because when water freezes, the hydrogen bonds between water molecules arrange themselves in a crystalline lattice structure with open spaces, resulting in a lower density solid (ice) compared to liquid water, causing it to take up more volume and expand.”

We all know from practical experience that freezing causes water to expand because that’s what causes pipes to rupture when frozen. That’s why you have to drain the pipes or cover them sufficiently to prevent it.

So, there are multiple reasons why ice is hard but also unstable.

I have memories from childhood of digging ice cubes out of a tray and having one explode. It would startle me but also intrigue me because it would seem like the ice cube vanished. Actually, it exploded.

And that’s what happened to JFK, and in his case, it was deliberate. The ice bullet was formulated to enter his back and burst. And there is no doubt that it existed. It was laid out to the Church Committee in 1975 by CIA Director William Colby. You can read about it here:

https://allthatsinteresting.com/heart-attack-gun?fbclid=IwAR3vFu-FY6m_SMg7XJIjiwOG-JMafuKciu_kvsLgvNZDezqOJo3LDIt_3io

At the hearing, Colby referred to shellfish toxin being used because a huge stockpile of it was found- enough to kill thousands of people.  But, Kennedy’s reaction, as seen in the Zapruder film, suggests to me that it may have been strychnine that was used because of the way his muscles seized up. He went into tetanic spasm. And it was progressive. It got worse as he sat there. It started in his arms, where he couldn’t put them down. But then, his back and his neck seized up. 

He may have died even without getting the fatal head shot because the tetanic spasm may have spread to his respiratory muscles, and he would have suffocated. That’s how Jane Stanford died in 1905 when she was poisoned with strychnine.

But, the other weird thing is that JFK suffered a complete mental collapse. He couldn’t speak, and it wasn’t because of the throat shot. It was because his mind collapsed. It was like a chemical lobotomy. There were probably multiple toxic agents in the frozen cocktail.

It was a preparatory shot, taken from low in the DalTex building, soon after the limo made the turn from Houston to Elm. By the time of the Croft photo, he was already hit, and they had to alter that photo immensely to hide it. Just think: In the last 3 photos before the throat shot, which are Croft, Betzner, and Willis, JFK had stopped waving. Why? Because he had been shot in the back and was being affected by the toxic payload. They had to cut all that out of the Zapruder film with the help of the phony freeway sign.

I know that, upon first hearing this, it sounds far-fetched. But, read that article about the CIA heart attack gun. They had it in 1963, and there is no other scenario that fits the facts. A metal bullet could not have stopped as fast as that missile did in JFK’s back, leaving a shallow wound. It didn’t stop; it burst on penetrating, as it was designed to do. 

The purpose of this preparatory shot was to turn JFK into a sitting duck who would take no evasive action. And Jackie saw the effects of it. She told the WC that the first she knew that something was wrong was when she turned and looked at her husband and saw that “he had a quizzical look on his face.” I’m sure he felt very strange at the time, like he had never felt before, and massive changes were occurring rapidly in his body.   

There is no alternative to this scenario. It is what happened.