Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 You can see that the guy visoring his eyes with his hands is standing in bright sunlight because his arms and his body are very illuminated. And the fact that he was visoring his eyes with his hands tells you that sunlight was streaming into his eyes and excessively. It must have been blinding him, and that's why he put his hands above his eyes to visor them. 

So, his face wasn't in shadow either, and the only thing that could have been casting any shadow on his face was his hands. But, his hands couldn't blacken out his whole face, and they would never create a shadow so dark. So, that is definitely an obfuscation that was done by the alterers. And it is glaring, as glaring as the sunlight that was irritating his eyes. It is a smoking gun, and everyone who saw it back in 1963 should have recoiled immediately. "Wait a second. That isn't right. No way is that real." 

But, why would they blacken out his face? Because they didn't want us to see it. Why? Because he was Billy Lovelady, and that was his face. They couldn't let us see it because they were going to claim that Oswald was Lovelady, and you can't have two Loveladys. 

Everybody should be screaming bloody murder over this ridiculous image. So, why don't they? And why didn't they? I like to say that it's because of the belief in Americana: the belief that things like that don't happen in Ameriica. And to anyone who objects and tries to defend this image, I ask that you not. Instead, get a camera out and duplicate it. Show me that you can create that headless effect yourself. I'll tell you that there isn't another image like this in the whole world. This is the only time it happened, that is, that it supposedly happened. Actually, it has never happened. The laws of optics, like the other laws of physics, cannot be broken.