What about the story that Ruth and Marina went into the garage with the Police and saw the empty blanket on the floor? It is complete bull shit. It could not possibly have happened. For one thing: there was no rifle, and therefore, there no rifle was ever wrapped in a blanket.

I explained that Ruth and Marina drove Oswald to the bus station when he moved to New Orleans, and neither said anything about him taking a rifle with him. The WC interrogator tried to get Ruth Paine to admit to a long, pole-like object that was 40 inches long, but she refused to do it. She was quite adamant. And the same goes for what was transported back to Irving from New Orleans.

Mr. JENNER - Was there a rifle packed in the back of the car?

Mrs. PAINE - No.

Mr. JENNER - You didn't see any kind of weapon?
Mrs. PAINE - No.
Mr. JENNER - Firearm, rifle, pistol, or otherwise?
Mrs. PAINE - No; I saw nothing of that nature.
Mr. JENNER - Did you drive them to your home?
Mrs. PAINE - Yes.

So, you don't have a rifle going to New Orleans, and you don't have one coming back from New Orleans. Therefore, there was no rifle in Ruth Paine's garage.

And, the very idea that Oswald would sneak his rifle into Ruth Paine's car and hope that it wound up in her garage is ridiculous. It is preposterous. Nobody would do that. He had friends in New Orleans, the Guy Bannister groupies. He could have left the rifle with one of them- or with Guy Bannister himself. Nobody would do what Oswald supposedly did.

It is widely acknowledged that when first asked if Oswald owned a rifle, Marina said that he used to, but it got sold. She was referring to the shotgun he owned in Russia. Months later, when testifying to the WC, she waxed on and on about him owning a rifle, but that was after she was MK-ULTRA'd by the feds. She was brainwashed, and I can just imagine how they went about doing it, telling her that she was traumatized, and that her mind was playinf tricks on her, suppressing her memory of what happened, but they were going to help her get her memories back. And lo and behold, she eventually remembered him getting a rifle, going to Mexico City, trying to shoot General Walker, etc, and all those things being completely bogus.

Before anything was done to her, when she was first asked, she said that Oswald currently owned no rifle. Period. End of sentence. And that settles it. You can't reconcile that with what followed, the wild stories she told. Those stories were planted in her by the FBI. Her brainwashing involved drugs, sex, you do realize she got emaciated during her "protective custody." Look at the collage.

Here is their attempt to pressure Ruth Paine about the rifle coming back with her from New Orleans.

Mr. JENNER - Now, was there a separate long package of any kind?
Mrs. PAINE - I do not recall such a package.
Mr. JENNER - Was there a separate package of any character wrapped in a blanket?
Mrs. PAINE - No. There was a basket such as you use for hanging your clothes. It carried exactly that, clothes and diapers, and they weren't as neat as being in suitcases and duffels would imply. There was leftovers stuffed in the corner, clothes and things, but rather open.
Mr. JENNER - So you saw no long rectangular package of any kind or character loaded in or placed in your station wagon?
Mrs. PAINE - No, it doesn't mean it wasn't there, but I saw nothing of that nature.
Mr. JENNER - You saw nothing?
Mrs. PAINE - I saw nothing.
Mr. JENNER - When you arrived in Irving, Tex., were you present when your station wagon was unpacked?
Mrs. PAINE - Marina and I did that with the exception of the duffels.
Mr. JENNER - You did it all yourself and you took out of the station wagon everything in it other than the two duffel bags?
Mrs. PAINE - Yes.
Mr. JENNER - Now, in the process of removing everything other than the two duffel bags-on the occasion on the 24th of September 1963 when you reached Irving, Tex., did you find or see any long rectangular package?
Mrs. PAINE - I recall no such package.
Mr. JENNER - Did you see any kind of a package wrapped in the blanket?
Mrs. PAINE - Not to my recollection.
Mr. JENNER - Did you see any package
Mrs. PAINE - I don't recall seeing the blanket either.

They eventually showed her the blanket, but Ruth wouldn't budge.

Mr. JENNER - And you are certain that you did not see the blanket in your station wagon when you arrived in Irving?

Mrs. PAINE - I do not recall seeing the blanket in my station wagon.

I tell you again that when Marina was first asked about Oswald owning a rifle before anything was done to her mind, she tacitly denied that he currently owned a rifle. All subsequent revisions to that have to be lies. Oswald said that he didn't own a rifle. So, he said it, and Marina said it. They both said it.

To all Americans: your government killed Kennedy. And your government is who wove all the friggin' lies about it that plague us to this day. This is what they did to Marina.

 Let's talk about the curtain rods. Oswald denied ever telling Frazier anything about curtain rods, and I believe him, And if you believe Frazier, you better stick around to the end because that man is not right in the head and never was.

The curtain rod story is stupid. How can you compare a flimsy pair of curtain rods to a military rifle that was scoped and 42 inches long? And you don't need a bag for curtain rods. They fit right in your hand. It would be less convenient to carry them in a bag than to just carry them. And why would Oswald go to Irving for that? They weren't his curtain rods. So what, is he a thief now besides being a murderer? He had $68 in cash, which was equivalent to over $740 today. And he lived in a boarding room which had curtains. I realize that, supposedly, it was a lie, but if Oswald were going to lie, I don't think his mind would even go to that.

The whole point is moot anyway since Oswald did not own a rifle. He said he didn't, and he wasn't lying. I have explained why you can't get the rifle to Ruth Paine's garage, but you also can't get it to New Orleans. Ruth and Marina drove Oswald to the bus station when he moved to New Orleans, and they both told WC interrogators what he brought with him, and neither of them claimed that he had a rifle. The interrogators didn't even recognize the significance of it. But, if Oswald didn't take a rifle to New Orleans, then he couldn't have brought one back from New Orleans, in any way, shape, or form.

Oswald did say that he brought a bag with him on Friday morning, and it contained his lunch: cheese sandwiches and an apple. And he stated where he ate it, in the domino room. If a man is going to shoot the President of the United States at 12:30, does he enjoy a leisurely lunch at 12? I would consider that a very strange behavior.

But, just think: the Dallas Police could have checked the trash can in the domino room for the refuse from the lunch Oswald said he ate. If they didn't find it, it would have proved that he lied. Of course, they never said anything about it, but if I could think of it, and I'm no Columbo, don't you think they could? So, maybe they did check, and if so, I assume they found that refuse. But then, they said nothing about it publicly, which I consider an obstruction of justice. The American people deserved to know about it if it happened.

Frazier is a mental case and always has been. In his WC testimony, he told Joseph Ball that he watched the motorcade from the steps, standing one step down from the top, next to the handrail. But, later in the questioning, Ball asked him why he isn't seen in the Altgens photo, and Frazier said it was because he was standing way up and back in the shadows. I'm sure he was oblivious to the fact that he contradicted himself, but what about Joseph Ball? Well, he didn't put Frazier on the spot about it, and I know why. It was because Frazier was his witness; saying the things that he wanted to hear.

At one of the mock trials, Frazier said that Lovelady was very short, just 5'2'. In reality, he was 5'8". The FBI measured him. Frazier also said that Lovelady watched the motorcade from the bottom of the steps; his mind not registering on the fact that it meant he couldn't be Doorman. In reality, Lovelady was standing right next to Oswald at the top of the steps. He was the guy visoring his eyes with his hands.

Wesley Buell Frazier, Billy Nolan Lovelady, Lee Harvey Oswald. Do you notice a pattern? The use of three names, it's a lone nuts assassin thing. Larry Rivera was the first to suggest that both Frazier and Lovelady were alternate patsies, in case things didn't work out with Oswald. And I believe Larry is right. And all three were in the doorway.

But, the big mystery is: How did Frazier come to say what he did about the curtain rods? Did his interrogators give it to him? I think there is a good chance that they did. As for Oswald, he certainly didn't go to Irving to get curtain rods or a non-existent rifle. He went there to leave most of that cash with his wife (again: it was equivalent to over $1800 today, and I bet even Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos don't walk around with that much cash on them). He was also hoping that she would agree to move back in with him, now that they had that money with which to get them an apartment. Unfortunately for him, she said she wasn't ready. Still, she let him spend the night with her. And no, he didn't get up to search for a non-existent rifle and make a bag out of paper and tape. The official story of the JFK assassination is not only wrong; it's stupid,

Another big question is: how did he accumulate that $68? He hadn't worked since July, and he only started at the TSBD a month before. He made $1.11/hr, and he had to support himself and give money to Marina. So, unless he stole it, and I'm sure he didn't,, it means that somebody must have given it to him. But who? I don't know.

The official story of the JFK assassination, in all its elements, is ridiculous. It is preposterous. It has stood only because of the fiat power of the U.S. government and the subservience of the U.S. Media.

The same goes for the U.S. educational establishment. You realize that education at the college level, and even at the primary and secondary levels, depends on the federal government. And by that I mean government money. Even private svchools are dependent on government money. And adhering to the government's version of history is part of the deal.

An example of the ridiculousness is the paper bag, the one that Oswald supposedly made. And just as the Mauser rifle quickly got replaced with a Carcano, the manufactured paper bag that Detective Montgomery marched around Dealey Plaza with quickly got replaced with a weird oblong thing that looks nothing like a commercial paper bag.

This bag is obviously not just brown paper that was taped together. It is a real paper bag that was manufactured. There is no way Oswald made it. But, the whole idea of him making a paper bag is stupid. It is totally unnecessary. If he wanted to wrap the rifle parts in brown paper, he would have spread the paper open somewhere, put the rifle parts on it, and then fold it up and tape it. In other words, you would wrap it like you would wrap a gift. You wouldn't start by making a bag.

And then, according to the official story, when he was ready to assemble the rifle at the TSBD, he preserved the bag. He didn't just tear it open; he poured the parts out of it to leave the bag intact. Notice how perfectly intact the bag was. There's not a rip, tear, or hole in it. And that's ridiculous because Oswald, supposedly, had to walk several blocks carrying the bag. The hard , jagged parts of a rifle are going to rip brown paper very easily, and especially if you have to walk with the package for several blocks, as Oswald supposedly did. The claim that the parts of a 42 inch rifle were carried for several blocks in this bag is just plain stupid.

And that goes for the whole official story of the JFK assassination; it is just plain stupid. And anyone who is a proponent of it needs to get the hell out of here. If you start piping your b.s. here, I will ban you in a New York second. I am 75 years old, and I am not wasting any of my remaining time talking to idiots.