Doc Whiteraven Having been a Navy Chaser, prisoners are not told anything...including where they are going...they are told to "roll it up," and that's it. Knowing the location of where they are going might result in an ambush of the transporting vehicle...

Manage

LikeShow more reactions

 · Reply · 2h

Ralph CinqueYou and 15 others manage the membership, moderators, settings, and posts for Association for John Kennedy Ambush Truth. Alright, then in that case, Doc Whiteraven, why didn't Oswald act surprised when he entered the garage and into a media spectacle? I say he didn't act surprised because he was prepped. He was recruited into the plot, except that he didn't know he was going to die at the end. They must have told him that they were going to get him out of this by faking his death.

Manage

LikeShow more reactions

 · Reply · 1m

If Ruby planned to shoot Oswald, why didn't he show up on time? 10:00 was the only time ever given. So, how did Ruby know he could arrive at 11:20 and still be able to shoot Oswald?

Stupid clowns claim that the Dallas Police signaled him from the window, but that makes no sense. How could Ruby be colluding with the Dallas Police when they were the ones who pounced upon him, dragged him up to the 5th floor, stripped him naked, and then subjected him to a rectal examination looking for weapons, as if he shoved a gun up his butt? And of course, they testified against him in court, called him a homosexual, and cooperated with the District Attorney to get him sentenced to death.

Do these fools not get it that conspirators work together because they all expect to win? They all expect to come out on top? And if you think the Police just double-crossed Ruby, then why didn't he sing like a canary? And how could they trust him not to sing like a canary after they betrayed him?

Just think about what they're saying, that it went something like this:

"OK, Jack, we'll signal you from the window when it's time to come down. Then, when you do it, we'll jump you, and sodomize you, you know, just for show, and we'll work with the prosecution to get you convicted and sentenced to death. Now, any questions?"

Nobody would do that. Ruby wouldn't do it, and the Police wouldn't do it either because they could never trust him to keep his mouth shut.

So, you can't make it that Ruby conspired with the Dallas Police- unless you are fucking insane.

So, since he could not have conspired with them, how did Ruby know that Oswald wasn't going to be moved until 11:20? The police never gave any guidance. Once 10:00 passed, it was up in the air. It was just going to happen when it happened.

And why, if there was collusion between Ruby and the Dallas Police would they bother complicating it? Why not just pick a time and stick to it? Why couldn't they have just done it at 10? Told him ahead of time and gone through with it at 10.

I'll tell you why they couldn't. It was because there was no collusion between Ruby and the Dallas Police. The reason it got delayed to 11:20 is because they were waiting on him- not vice versa. They were waiting on him to arrive- waiting for him to wind up there as a consequence of the manipulation that was applied to him, starting with the call from Karen Carlin. All of that was planned. But, Ruby was still a living, breathing human being who was seemingly guiding himself around. Ruby was oblivious- to everything. He didn't know a damn thing about anything. He was completely and totally in the dark. He didn't know that he was late to anything. He was just stumbling around in a drugged state, and the way it went down was that he just didn't get there until 10;20. And they had to process him. So, that's why it happened so late. They were ready. They were just waiting on him.

Think of it like a surprise birthday party in which the birthday boy is expected to get home from work at 8 PM, as he usually does, but it turns out that this day he does something different, and he doesn't get home until 9:20. So, the revelers waiting at his house just have to wait. They just have to sit tight until he gets there. It's not like they are in complete control of him. They still have to work around what his autonomous mind decides to do.

And Ruby's mind wasn't completely autonomous- far from it. But, he was driving his own car and going about his morning with the usual sense of autonomy that people have.

They were leading him by the nose, and it was a very Machiavellian process, but they still had to wait until his fractured mind got him there.

And frankly, there was no guarantee that he was going to get there at all. Did they have a backup plan in case Ruby didn't show up? They very well may have.

The people who think that Ruby conspired WITH the Dallas Police are not only stupid but really sick in the head. Their whole understanding of human nature and human motivation is severely warped. And, they are also extremely immature. Mentally, they are like children.

One visit with a lawyer would have collapsed the case against Lee Harvey Oswald. The criminality of the FBI and the Dallas Police would have been exposed. They couldn't allow it. But consider that Fritz got an attorney for Ruby immediately: Tom Howard. FRITZ WAS SEEN CONFERRING WITH HOWARD ON SATURDAY EVENING.  

So, why didn't Fritz get a lawyer for Oswald? And why didn't Fritz get a cabana suit for Oswald as he did for Ruby? But, I digress.

The common lore is that Oswald refused an attorney because he wanted John Abt, but what do we really know about the truth of that? We know that Oswald complained publicly several times about not having an attorney, and to me, he sounded really irate, really upset about it. And when he had a chance to speak to the public at the Midnight Press Conference, he asked for someone to come forward to give him legal assistance. He didn't ask for someone to contact John Abt. He just asked for legal assistance. 

So, what do we have directly from Oswald about John Abt? 
What do we have to substantiate the common lore that he rejected legal assistance, that he said no to having a local criminal defense attorney? 

Well, we don't have anything from Oswald directly because he never mentioned it in public. I found one reference to it in the Fritz Notes, the 4th Fritz Note. This note was not dated, but it had to be an interrogation on Saturday, November 23. So, let's consider the significance of it. It says, "Desires to speak to Mr. Abt." Wait a second; that doesn't even establish that Oswald wanted Abt to defend him. It doesn't say, "Desires Mr. Abt to represent him."

And since Abt isn't mentioned prior to that, we have to presume that Oswald didn't bring him up prior to that. Why? Because Fritz would have written it down prior to that. And that means that on Friday night, at the Midnight Press Conference, Oswald hadn't, to that point, said a word to Dallas Police about Abt. So, when he gave the impassioned request for legal assistance, it existed in a vacuum. It means he must have complained about not having a lawyer in a vacuum. 

And that brings us to the testimony of Attorney H. Louis Nichols, who did not practice criminal law but was the head of the Dallas Bar Association. He visited Oswald on Saturday afternoon and said that Oswald rejected Nichols' offer to get him an attorney. But, consider the following facts:

1. Nichols claimed that he took no notes. Think about that a second. He's an attorney, and he didn't bring a pencil and paper to write anything down. It didn't occur to him to do that. 

2. When, Oswald rejected a lawyer from Nichols, did Nichols weigh upon him about the importance of having an attorney, that holding out for a lawyer in New York whom he didn't know and had never had contact with, was not a prudent thing to do? Did he impress upon him that he could get a local Texas lawyer and that Abt could join the case afterwards, so there was no reason to reject immediate help? 

3. And even though Nichols was not a criminal defense lawyer, he was a lawyer. And since he was there, and supposedly on Oswald's behalf, did he make any attempt to garner any information from him about the charges? He did mention that Oswald said that he wanted a lawyer who believed in his innocence, which is a tacit way of claiming innocence. But, would it have killed Nichols to solicit information from Oswald about what happened? Doesn't it seem like he should have started by asking, "Do you want to tell me what happened?" And again, I realize that he wasn't a criminal defense attorney, but he was an attorney, and presumably, he was an intelligent man. If he was going to go there at all, why wouldn't he act lawyerly? Why wouldn't he think like a lawyer? Why would he be so restricted in his interaction, as to say, "Do you want me to get you a lawyer or not?" It would be one thing if he wasn't a lawyer at all, but he was a lawyer. And he certainly had to know that Oswald desperately needed a lawyer.  He certainly was knowledgeable enough to tell Oswald that he was making a grave mistake by turning down his offer to get him a lawyer. And yet, he didn't. According to him, Oswald said no thanks, and he said fine.  

Look: if it was a medical emergency, say a heart attack, and the only doctor around was an orthopedist, he would do the best he could, even though he wasn't a cardiologist, right? Well, Nichols was a lawyer, and he should have done the best he could, and he should have acted lawyerly to Oswald. For instance, upon seeing, he should have asked him how he was. Nichols said that he looked alright, that he had a scratch or bruise over one eye but otherwise seemed OK. But, Nichols was a lawyer, so why wouldn't he ask Oswald about it? And the fact was that Oswald had a scratch over one eye, but the other eye had major swelling. The whole supraorbital area was swollen. 

 So, Nichols' minimizing of Oswald's injuries wasn't legit either. He sounded more like a lawyer for the Dallas Police. 

Nichols was in the Army during WW2, and he was in the Army Reserve in 1963, holding the rank of Colonel. 

Do you know how long Nichols spent with Oswald? Two minutes. The man was being accused of murdering the President of the United States and a police officer, and this lawyer excused himself after two minutes.

So, this attorney was also a Colonel in the U.S. Army. When he spoke to the press, Chief Curry stood right behind him.

It was just the night before that Oswald pleaded with the world to give him legal assistance. So, when a lawyer finally walked into his cell offering to get him legal assistance, did Oswald actually say no? And this Nichols said that he received multiple inquiries from defense lawyers in Dallas concerned about Oswald's legal rights and his need for an attorney. But, doesn't it seem likely that one or more of them would have called the DPD about it? Or, just gone there and said: I'm a criminal defense attorney, and I am offering my services to Oswald.

So, how many lawyers did call the DPD? I suggest that Nichols' appearance was in response to Oswald's public appeal and that it was instigated by the DPD itself. I think they allowed Nichols to see Oswald on the stipulation that he not discuss the case with him. I find it very strange that a lawyer, supposedly concerned with the legal rights of an accused suspect, would not discuss the case with him at all. There you see Curry standing behind Nichols. So, was it really Curry who called him? 

P.S. I'm not certain they let him see Oswald. And that's because I find it hard to believe that Oswald was stupid enough to be in the situation he was in and actually turn down help from an attorney. Would you? Furthermore, you would think that just from the standpoint of having an attorney to come visit him who was not presumptive of his guilt, who was open to listening to his side of the story with an open mind, his account of what happened that day, would appeal to him greatly.  You would think that Oswald would be dying to be heard, especially since his interrogators weren't hearing him except with tainted, closed minds. So, I have to wonder if Nichols ever really saw Oswald at all, or if he saw someone else, an Oswald double. 

Juliette de la Bretoniere Exactly. They needed the public to SEE that there wasn’t going to be any trial. Premonition? No, preparation.

1

Manage

LikeShow more reactions

 · Reply · 1d

Ralph Cinque Wow, that was well put, Juliette. Just think: the case against Oswald was so weak that they couldn't even let him see a lawyer never mind be tried. Not even one meeting with a lawyer could be allowed. Because: just think what he would have said: I do not own nor did I ever order a rifle; I did not pose for a picture with a rifle; I did not have a P.O. Box. I was not on the 6th floor, rather, I was standing in the doorway during the shooting. The case against Oswald would have exploded. His lawyer would have known, within minutes, that Dallas police were not only wrong about Oswald but they were sifting through a pile of fabricated evidence- evidence that came from the FBI. Oswald's lawyer would have known in short order that the U.S. government was framing Oswald. And why would they do that? Because the U.S. government killed Kennedy.

Oswald was abundantly photographed after his arrest. Few pictures of him were taken at the theater, but after that, at the PD, there was a torrent of pictures taken, both on Friday and Saturday. I doubt that any criminal detainee ever got photographed more. 

So, the idea that the press needed to get a picture of him being walked 30 feet to a car and driven off, and that they would set up huge cameras and lights in a garage to do that, is preposterous. 

THEY DIDN'T DO ALL THAT TO CAPTURE A PICTURE OF OSWALD BEING WALKED TO A CAR. THEY DID IT TO CAPTURE OSWALD BEING SHOT. 

Now, I don't say that the ones actually doing it knew it ahead of time. They did what they were told. But, the plotters (LBJ and his people) definitely wanted to capture the shooting and show it to the public. Why? Because if they didn't, if they just said that Oswald was shot by an intruder, many wouldn't believe it. Suspicions would have risen immediately that the State killed him, and they would have persisted. So, it was a matter of providing false evidence of a phony shooting in which he was shot for real afterwards. 

The Sixth Floor Museum did a reenactment of the Oswald shooting, and you should see the lights they brought in. You'd think it was a football stadium. Gary Mack actually made the claim that the reason Leavelle and Graves didn't turn and look at "Ruby" as he rushed in (Leavelle claimed that he did, but the films show that he didn't) is because they were blinded by the lights. But, we know very well that it isn't true because you only have to watch any of the films to see that it wasn't that bright. 

In the WFAA film, this is how dark it was in the garage when Oswald was brought out.

The whole idea of staging such a spectacle to walk Oswald 30 feet to a car is ridiculous on the face of it. Listen to me: it was all a dog and pony show. It was a made-for-television extravaganza. Nobody would do such a thing. Remember; they were in frantic mode that somebody was going to try to hurt Oswald. That very morning they were saying on the radio how concerned police were and how much danger Oswald was in. It was like they had a premonition it was going to happen. If they were that worried, why didn't they just move Oswald in the middle of the night without any fanfare or announcement? They could have just informed the press afterwards. And if there were any complaints about it, there is a response for that: Go fuck yourself! The whole idea that the press was entitled to be there when Oswald was put into a car is ridiculous. It's absurd. THIS WAS THE SHOWCASING OF OSWALD'S MURDER. Don't you get it? It's not that hard to see. It's not hard at all.    

What was Oswald told about the jail transfer? When a prisoner is transferred from one jail to another, I presume he is told just that and nothing more. "You are being transferred to the County Jail." That's it. Why the hell would you tell him any more than that?

So imagine that YOU are the prisoner, and you are told that you are being transferred to the County Jail. What would your expectations be? Wouldn't they be pretty damn small? That you are just going to be put in a car and driven to the County Jail? 

So now, imagine that you're Lee Harvey Oswald, and that's all you've been told, and that's all you expect. But then, it turns out that it is going to be a big spectacle, a media event, that you are going to be involved in a procession. 

DAH... dah, dah, dah... DAH, DAH.
DAH... dah, dah, dah DAH.  
DAH... dah, dah, dah, DAHHH-DAH. 
DAH, DAH, DAH-dah, dah-DAHHHH!

So, what is Oswald going to think, and what is he going to do? What he is going to think is: "What the fuck is this?"  And what his going to do is: Look the fuck around. 

But, he doesn't. He comes out like the bride at a wedding being led down the aisle by her father- looking straight ahead. Why would he do that? Why wouldn't he be turning his head and looking around, as in: What the fuck is going on here? Instead, he acts just like Leavlle and Graves and looks straight ahead. It's like they are all in a wedding. It's like they're all zombies. It's like Oswald is the bride, and he's got two fathers walking him down the aisle. 

I understand why they, Leavelle and Graves, are walking as if in a procession, and it's because they expected it; they knew it was coming; and they were told to just look straight ahead, and whatever you do, don't look to their left. But, why is Oswald doing it? He does swiftly glance at the shooter at one point, but he quickly got his eyes back straight ahead, even as the shooter came in. But, for the most part, Oswald did just as they did and kept his eyes peeled straight ahead and maintained a stiff, solemn look, and SHOWED NOT THE LEAST SURPRISE TO WALK INTO THIS GALA.  What it means is that, like Leavelle and Graves, Oswald was told what was going to happen and ordered to just look straight ahead. Oswald participated in the procession just as much as Leavelle, Graves, Fritz, etc. Again: Oswald showed not the least bit of surprise to walk into this. It WAS no surprise. They told him what to expect.  They told him everything. Don't you get it? OSWALD WAS IN ON IT. He was in on the ruse. It was all an act. They were all acting. But, that includes Oswald. 

Oswald knew he wasn't going to be shot in the garage- and he wasn't. But, what he didn't know is that he was going to be shot soon afterwards. They double-crossed him. They must have told him that they were going to get him out of this, but they had to feign his death first- or else somebody would come gunning for him. And Oswald believed them. He never considered that they were lying and were planning all along to kill him soon afterwards.

It was the most dastard and diabolical double-cross in the history of double-crosses. GOD-DAMN, WERE THESE PEOPLE VICIOUS. And, they were the police! How could the police do such a thing? But, they did. 

Look at this picture again because it is clear visual evidence that Oswald was participating. IT'S ABNORMAL. It's abnormal to walk to a car like that, like you're in a procession, for anybody to do it. But, they're all doing it, and it's because they were all in on it, including Oswald. 

You know that the transfer was one hour and twenty minutes late and that they had Oswald up in Fritz' office. What do you think they were talking about? They weren't talking about him going to Mexico City. That was just a yarn that the evil Postal Inspector Harry Holmes made up. What they were talking about was this; what was about to happen; the show they were about to put on. 

  

This is a simple thing, but it speaks volumes. It's an image of Michael Hardin, the ambulance driver, tending to his stretcher at Parkland Hospital after delivering Oswald. For some reason, there were a lot of kids there that day, and in this frame, we see a boy in just a t-shirt. We're talking November 24 in Dallas, Texas- not Miami, Florida. So, I looked up the temperature on November 24, 1963 in Dallas, and the high for the day was 55 degrees. And note that the high temperature usually occurs around 3 pm. So, at 11:40 in the morning, which this was, it had to be considerably cooler than 55 degrees. And yet, there's the kid in the t-shirt looking comfortable. What does it tell you? It should tell you that this was a different day and probably a different time of the year. It was reenactment. And that's the reason why we don't see Hardin's assistant, Harold Wolfe. Apparently, they couldn't get Wolfe for the reenactment. Maybe he refused. And by the way, he reportedly went on to commit suicide- if you believe it. People: the whole story of Oswald's murder is false, including the part about Jack Ruby shooting him. That's just the cover story. It was much deeper, darker, and more Satanic than that.