Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Remember that it's not just the image of Oswald in the doorway of the Altgens photo that we have; we can also see him in the doorway of the Wiegman film. 

It's a distorted image on the right, but that's him, Oswald. The same man; the same clothes. 

And speaking of his clothes, notice that there is not the least bit, not the tiniest hint of anything that could be perceived as plaid on his shirt. Nobody denies that it's the same guy whom we see in the Altgens photo. What happened to all the contrast on his shirt?

What happened to all that contrast? It was never there. What we're seeing is just haze, distortion, and light reflection. (Above on the right, I have Oswald's left shoulder filled in as it really was. It got taken out by the implantation of Black Tie Man.)

How could a shirt as flashy and geometric as that of the Lovelady impostor show up so dull in the Wiegman film?

It's like it got stripped of everything. It's like it all came out in the wash. How could that possibly be the same shirt? To think that that much design and contrast would vanish is ridiculous. 

And what about the shirt sprawl? The Lovelady impostor doesn't have any. His top button is unsecured, but other wise, the shirt is all buttoned up. You can see that very clearly.

I'll spell this out for you, Backass: the only option you've got is to claim that Lovelady buttoned up between the Wiegman film and the Martin film. But so far, nobody has tried to claim that. 

Then, there is the issue of Doorman's position. As we can see in Wiegman, he was turned some towards Kennedy, and I mean his whole body, which I have said about the Altgens Doorman for years, but he is not leaning. He is standing up straight. He is not leaned over. Why would he be? He wouldn't. He wasn't. He didn't. 

So, Oswald in Wiegman confirms what we see of Oswald in Altgens, and it disposes of some of the nonsense that is claimed about him in Altgens. This is important stuff.