Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

DAVID VON PEIN SAID: 

Of course it's wrong, Cinque. Because it's an obvious LIE being told by 
the ASSASSIN HIMSELF! 

Bookhout and Fritz weren't lying---Oswald was. Bookhout and Hosty and 
Fritz were merely taking notes as a LIAR was giving them false 
information. 

But for some reason, Cinque thinks Oswald was telling the *gospel truth* 
when he said he was "out with Shelley". But regardless of whether it was 
DURING or AFTER the assassination, it's still a lie being told by Oswald, 
because we know via Shelley *himself* that Shelley never saw or talked to 
Oswald after about 11:45 or 11:50 AM on November 22. 

And yet, incredibly, Ralph Cinque thinks the "out with Shelley" note 
written by Captain Fritz "is the most important piece of evidence to be 

discovered in the JFK assassination since November 22, 1963."

Hilarious! 

Ralph Cinque:

David, it's time for you to get a carotid artery ultrasound from eating all that fried chicken.

You say Oswald was a LIAR? But, don't you think he could have been a better liar than that? Or perhaps you find no fault with his lying. But, I think it would be awfully stupid of him to use someone as an alibi whom he knew was not going to confirm it. It would better to say that he saw no one.

Why would Oswald say he encountered Shelley out front after the assassination when Shelley wasn't out there at that time? And, it wasn't that Oswald didn't know whether Shelley was there or not. He knew Shelley wasn't there because he didn't see him there. So, what you're saying is that Oswald cited someone whom he knew was not only going to say that he didn't see Oswald there, but was going to say that he wasn't even there himself at the time. What an incredibly stupid lie to tell.

But, it's even worse because he had no reason to tell it. He never said he left for home because Shelley gave him permission. Think about it. Oswald left the building, and in doing so he had already made up his mind to go home. He didn't step outside to get a breath of fresh air. So, Oswald already had made up his mind to go home before the hypothetical encounter with Shelley took place. Oswald decided on his own to go home because he assumed no further work would be done that day. And by the way: he was essentially right.

But, the point is: why would Oswald make up a story about seeing Shelley outside afterwards for no reason? HE DIDN'T NEED AN ALIBI FOR BEING OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AFTER THE ASSASSINATION. It wasn't in doubt that he left for home. Why would he tell a lie about seeing Shelley at that time when it served him no purpose? 

Without a doubt, Oswald said he was out with Bill Shelley in front. Isn't it far more likely that he said it in reference to a time that Bill Shelley was actually out there rather than when he wasn't out there? Shelley was there during the assassination. He was not there when Oswald left for home. How can you be so obtuse not to realize that Oswald must have been talking about during the assassination?