Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This really screams out loud that the "Ruby" image was altered. Look at the eyes of Boyd and Hall, both clear as a bell. So, why would the guy between them have black stripes for eyes?

So, on the left is Elmer Boyd, and his eyes are clear and totally photographic. On the right is Detective Hall, who is in poor lighting, but his eyes are likewise clear and formed. But then we get to so-called "Ruby" whose face is illuminated, but his eyes are not photographic; they are just black slits. That is impossible. And behind him is Sims who is a complete blur, and that's impossible too because it's all one photograph. It's not as though Sims was moving and had motion blur. He's just standing there. So, he should have come out clear. Dark perhaps but clear; not ghostlike. So, they doctored Bookhout's eyes, reducing them to mere slits, and then they blurred Sims, so that Bookhout wouldn't stand alone as photographically compromised. So, two were captured in photographic clarity, and the other two were not, and that is ridiculous. Because: it's all one photograph, and everyone should look the same in that respect. 

They all have the same clarity.

They all have the same clarity.

They all have the same clarity.

They all have the same clarity. 

They all have the same clarity. I could keep doing this forever.