Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Brian Pete is really stupid. Immature and stupid. Forever a punk kid. Now, he's accusing me of altering the Johnston photo, taking out Grave's tie pin.

Why would I do that? And how could I expect to get away with it? 

I'm 67 years old. I'm not here playing games. 

The rendering of the Johnston photo without the tie clip is widely available. I didn't invent it. Here it is from The Mirror which is a UK paper.

And here's the link to it:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/james-leavelle-arrested-jfk-assassin-2711431

You're stupid, Pete. You're just Joseph Backes with a little more pit bull in you.

So, now we know there are two versions of the Johnston photo, one with the tie pin and the other without. But, Johnston only took one photo, right?

Keep in mind that putting the pin in or taking it out would have been easy as pie- then or now. So, which was it? They had to do one or the other because there is only one Johnston photo. I suspect they put it in to match the one at the hospital. 

And regardless, we still have that glaring and conspicuous military-style belt with the solid metal buckle in Johnston.

That is not the same belt, Punk, and you can't bully your way to making it the same belt. The ambiguity over the tie pin only makes the situation worse- for you and yours. Thanks for pointing it out.