Hmm. This is weird. I put this up on Facebook early this morning, and now it has over 700 views?
Wow. I dare say, that is a lot. But then again, it does make a good point: that Oswald's innocence was staring us in the face ever since Marrion Baker testified to the Warren Commission. You see that door with the glass in it? That was a swinging door. And when you went through it, it automatically closed itself. There was no chance that it was going to stay open. The spring pulled it closed. But, it was designed to work slowly. Why? Because otherwise it could slam someone in the face. So, if Oswald had gone through that door, and he was still in the anteroom, it was a very small room, just a passageway, and it would not have taken him long to clear it. So, if he was still there behind the door, having just gone through it, the door would have still be moving. It would still be closing. But, Baker never said the door was moving. The only thing moving was Oswald. Therefore, OSWALD MUST HAVE COME THROUGH THE OTHER DOOR. He came from the other side. He accessed the lunch room from the office side. And be aware that he left that way, for sure. That's because he encountered Josephine Reid in the office. (She went by Mrs. Robert Reid. Yikes! Was it 1963 or 1863?) And she said he had a Coke. She saw the open bottle. Both Truly and Baker denied, over and over, that Oswald had anything in his hand. And when specifically asked if he had a Coke, they both said no. Now, you can throw all the suspicion you want at Roy Truly. That's fine with me, because he was into it up to his neck. The TSBD was a CIA front company. "Under the guise" of distributing school books, as William Weston put it, they were doing espionage- and worse- for the CIA. But, Marrion Baker was just a lowly motorcycle cop at the DPD. He wasn't in on anything.
So, even if you think Truly would have lied about Oswald not having a Coke, Baker would not have. Oswald did not get his Coke until after his encounter with them. So, why did he get one? For the same reason he got popcorn at the theater; he just had the yen for it. But, it suggests to me that he didn't realize how much trouble he was in because when the sky is falling, you tend to forget about such things.
But, consider this contradiction about Roy Truly. On the one hand, he reported it to Dallas Police that Oswald was missing. Tell me something: if you were missing from work, how quickly would your boss assume that you might have murdered someone? But wait. If Truly reported Oswald to the Dallas Police for being missing, why did he, before that, so quickly brush off Oswald to Marrion Baker? Why go from "This guy? No way. He works for me." to "Oswald is missing, and I have a bad feeling." in 30 minutes or less? Of course, we know the reason. Oswald could not be arrested unarmed at the TSBD. The idea was to get him armed so that he could be shot.
So, Truly told Baker that Oswald worked for him, but did he say more than that? And did he say it with an attitude of confidence and certainty that it couldn't be him? I suspect so. For, why 30 minutes later did he go to police with the information that Oswald was missing, like it meant everything?
I remind you that there was no access to the 6th floor from the office side. Oswald could only have come up from the 1st floor, and that is what he did. This diagram and Baker's testimony prove that Oswald was innocent.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.