Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

One of the most important witnesses in the JFK assassination is Carolyn Arnold. That's because she was the last to see Oswald before the shooting. And it was shortly before the shooting: standing at the doorway, behind the glass; not in front of it; he hadn't come out yet; but, he was about to come out. That is what she told the FBI on November 26, 1963. And there is NO REASON to think that this 19 year old girl lied to them. And there is also no reason to think that the FBI made it up. Why would they make up such a thing? You'd have to be a lunatic to think they made it up. Might as well say that they shot themselves.

But, what about her 1978 revision? We don't even know she made one. We never heard from her. We heard from a reporter named Earl Golz who said he talked to her, and that she said that on her way downstairs, she saw Oswald eating alone in the 2nd floor lunch room at 12:25. That is ridiculous. First, Oswald said he ate in the 1st floor lunch room, and Oswald didn't lie. And, we can't assume he ate two lunches that day. Plus, he always ate in the 1st floor lunch room. It's where the grunt workers ate, if they brought their lunch. Plus, there was usually a newspaper there which he liked to read. 

Earl Golz was a reporter for the Dallas Morning News, and it was the DMN that published the story. The DMN? Do you understand that the DMN has been the most vigorous defender of the official story of the JFK assassination of any newspaper in this country? And no newspaper has cast aspersions on "conspiracy theorists" more vigorously than the Dallas Morning News.  They would NEVER publish a story that vindicated Oswald. That is, they would never publish one that is true. A false story of vindication is worse than no vindication at all. That the Dallas Morning News published the story tells you that it must be false, that it can't do any real good to Oswald or any real damage to the official story. 

But, the question is: did Earl Golz even talk to Carolyn Arnold? Or, was he conned into thinking that he did? They could have gotten someone else. A Carolyn Arnold double, if you will? Look how many Oswald doubles and false sightings of Oswald there were? And the same goes for Jack Ruby. They had a Jack Ruby double at the DPD on Friday afternoon when it is certain, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Jack Ruby did not go there then. And, they apparently had a Jack Ruby double at Parkland Hospital on Friday afternoon too, when Jack Ruby didn't go there either. 

If Carolyn Arnold, the real Carolyn Arnold, wanted to reveal something that would vindicate Lee Harvey Oswald why wouldn't she do it herself? Why would she let Earl Golz speak for her? Why wouldn't she go to her lawyer or to her congressman and then announce it to the world at a press conference in front of a sea of cameras and microphones? "I saw Lee Harvey Oswald on the 2nd floor, eating, 5 minutes before President Kennedy was shot." That would be news; would it not be?  And after that, why wouldn't she write a book? In other words, it's one of those things that, if you are going to go public with it, you go public. You, yourself, go public. 

Oswald, like everyone else, got off work at 11:45 that morning.  It was a little earlier than usual, and precisely so that people could eat lunch and then get situated to watch the motorcade at 12:25. That was the announced time of its arrival in Daley Plaza, although, as you know, it was 5 minutes late. Oswald hadn't eaten that day. We know that from Ruth Paine. He didn't eat breakfast at her house. And he worked all morning, schlepping books. So why, if he got off work at 11:45, would he put off eating until 12:25? He wouldn't. He couldn't. He didn't. He knew the President was coming. He didn't know it before he got to work. He learned it from James Jarmon. And that's according to James Jarmon.  What did he have to do that he would put off eating? Nothing.  He had no calls to make. He had no love letter to write. not to his wife Marina, and not to Judyth Baker, whom he didn't even know.  He didn't have any crossword puzzles to work. He didn't practice origami. The point is that not only is the 2nd floor the wrong location for Oswald to have eaten lunch, it was also the wrong time. THAT STORY VINDICATING OSWALD WAS PUBLISHED IN THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS PRECISELY BECAUSE IT WAS FALSE. It was all a sinister plot. Its purpose was to divert attention from the fact that Oswald was at the doorway at that time. Again: think of the source: the Dallas Morning News. Are aware that the DMN, in cahoots with the Sixth Floor Museum, has made numerous films extolling the official story of the JFK assassination? The DMN has been a major propaganda arm of the Establishment in the promulgation of the BIG LIE about the JFK assassination. They would NEVER publish a true story which pointed to Oswald's innocence. They would only publish a false one. 

And think about something else. If this story was real and true,  then why didn't the HSCA call on Carolyn Arnold? Why didn't they drag her to Washington? Why didn't they force her to testify? 

What you have to realize about the HSCA is that it probably got started with good intentions. And that is unlike the Warren Commission which got started with bad intentions. But, the leadership of the HSCA got replaced with bad people with bad intentions, whose only purpose was to protect the government and stifle the truth. And these bad people appointed very dumb people, like Robert Blakey, to run the HSCA. The result was that only crap came out. 

The bottom line is that this 19 year old girl did not lie to the FBI. She told them the truth, that she saw Oswald at the doorway, shortly before the shooting, and shortly before he stepped outside. Her so-called revision, made 5000+ days later, was designed and intended to manipulate the conspiracy crowd, to give them false fodder, to keep them busy in an arena that was safe- far away from the truth.   

Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository when JFK got shot, and in the year of Our Lord 2019, there is no longer any doubt about that.