Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It  is important to remember that when the decision was made to turn Oswald into Lovelady, they weren't going to just tell the world he was Lovelady and assume that their lip-flapping would sell it.  They knew they had to do something to turn him into Lovlady- at least a little. So, what they did was move over the top of the head, including the hairline. They used a photo of Lovelady from the 1950s not realizing that he had lost a lot of hair since then. This is the photo alongside Doorman, and you can see that they are identical. But, it's ridiculous because hair is constantly changing, and Lovelady was rapidly balding young man. So, how could he have the exact same cut, length, lay, and form of his hair in 1963 that he had in 1957? It's fake. It's an altered photo. The evil is very, very great here. It is so devious and Machiavellian. Yes, they match all right, but do you understand that they match too good? We're looking at hair, which is constantly growing, constantly falling out, and constantly being affected by weather, humidity, the use of shampoos and conditioners, the effect of sleeping on it, progressive baldness, etc. These two are exactly the same in length and everything else over 6 years time, and that is a problem. They moved it over. They used the one on the left to make the one on the right. If you are going to study the JFK assassination without considering photographic alteration,  you will be left completely in the dark.