Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, there is no evidence whatsoever that anybody threatened Ruby. The idea that he shot Oswald to save his sister's life is utter nonsense. There isn't even a speculation for it. It's just a tall tale that took off and developed a following. And it really is stupid because if it were true, then they would have had to kill Ruby right away. How could they trust him to keep his mouth shut? And why would they trust him?

The fact is that Ruby didn't know anything. The famous statement he made to reporters was based entirely on a book he read, A Texan Looks At Lyndon. Somebody brought it to him at the County Jail. Ruby didn't know LBJ. The book said that LBJ put Oswald up to doing it. And that's silly too.

The absolute proof that Ruby knew nothing is that he was given a lawyer right away. He didn't even ask for one. Now, think about it for a moment. Think, think, think, think, think. Compare it to Oswald.  Oswald pleaded for a lawyer repeatedly and implored the whole world to provide him with legal assistance, and he was never given one. Ruby never asked for one, yet, he was given one? Now, if there is anything more polar opposite than that, I don't know what it is. They were willing to give Ruby a lawyer because they knew that he didn't know anything, that he had nothing on them, that he could reveal nothing to that lawyer. And they also knew that the lawyer would get the sense that he was a mental case. And remember that he was declared to be psychotic. But, Oswald was lucid. Oswald could communicate rationally with an attorney. And he could answer any question an attorney threw at him. And after talking to Oswald for 30 minutes, that attorney would know, beyond any doubt, that he was framed and innocent. 

So, stop thinking that Ruby was in with the mob, that he delivered guns, that he met with Oswald and Frank Sturgis, etc. All that stuff is complete, utter bull shit. I dare say there may be more false Ruby sightings than there are false Oswald sightings, and there are plenty of them. 

What they did to Jack Ruby is the most deplorable and disgusting thing I know of. He was so helpless; so totally weak and incapacitated; and so fundamentally decent, honest, and good. He didn't have a bad bone in his body. The Dallas Police sacrificed him to cover up their crime of killing Oswald, and they were supported by the FBI. Most of those DPD detectives, if not all of them, knew exactly what was going on and what was being done to Ruby.  They were doing it to Ruby.  They killed Oswald because their Commander in Chief told them that they had to in order to save the country from chaos. But, what they did to Ruby was worse than outright killing him.  And how did they justify such a monstrous act? They were led to believe that Oswald was a cop-killer, but Jack Ruby was their friend and supporter. He was like a groupie to them. So, how could they crush him like they did?

Well, there is strength in numbers. A terrible thing that a person could never do by himself, he may be able to do as a member of a group.  The group legitimizes the evil act, as happens all the time in war. 

Join the campaign to exonerate Jack Ruby. The moral divide here is very clear. If we let them get away with this, then we are no better than they are. Take back Jack!