Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

These interviews of Sirhan Sirhan and Jack Ruby are very much the same, where they both say that they do not remember what happened, and they do not remember shooting RFK  and Oswald, respectively.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjFpVhiZy_I


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VjbE0Y2YMg&t=34s

They were both innocent. They were both manipulated and mind-controlled, through psychological and pharmacological means. Why do you think Dr. Louis Joylan West became Ruby's psychiatrist in prison? Why did they have to fly him out from California when there were plenty of psychiatrists in Dallas? And guess what? Sirhan Sirhan saw "Jolly" too. There is no official record of it, but when he was shown an image of Jolly, Sirhan said that he recognized him as one of his handlers. 

Oswald was different. He had an aversion to taking drugs, and perhaps their inability to drug him is what limited their ability to manipulate him mentally. Oswald was of sound mine; Jack Ruby and Sirhan Sirhan were not.  

Ruby was the first of the MK-ULTRA patsies, and Sirhan was not the last. Oswald was the first and last sound one, and they were not going to go down that road again. He did a lot of damage to them in the last two days of his life. He did so much damage that they had to shut him up before he talked to a lawyer. 

Why did they have to kill Dorothy Kilgallen? It was because she talked to Ruby, and the fear was that she was getting a glimmer of the truth that he was innocent. They couldn't take the chance.