Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is in response to Ron Schuster who believes what he sees in the Zapruder film, that JFK rode down the hill smiling and waving and then was shot twice behind the sign, once in the back and once in the throat.

Of course, the official story has it that it was all one shot, but let me tell you: if you want to believe it was two separate shots, they don't care. You will still be doing their bidding. The truth is that there was a lot of separation between the back shot and the throat shot, and I mean both temporal separation and geographic separation.

So, what's the proof? First, there is the fact that they cut out the swath in the Zapruder film of JFK riding down the hill. And what I mean is that the steepest descent in Dealey Plaza takes place right as you pass the obelisk. That's where it starts. You had to go down that steep hill before you got to the freeway sign. But, in the Zapruder film, the limo gets to the freeway sign soon after it leaves the intersection. That is bull shit. This image that I am attaching from the Zapruder film is bull shit. They cinched it up. They removed a big part of Dealey Plaza.

So why did they do it? It's because JFK got shot in the back and he reacted to it as he rode down the hill. But, they wanted the story to be that he was fine until he reached the freeway sign. So, they removed the part I'm talking about, and they moved up the freeway sign.

Even though the Zapruder film shows JFK smiling and waving until he reaches the freeway sign, the photo evidence contradicts it. The Crofts, Betzner, and Willis photos all show that JFK stopped waving. And remember that he was a politician, and this was a political trip. He was there to work the crowd; to secure Texas for the Democrats in '64. Something had to be wrong for him to stop waving.

In her WC testimony, Jackie said that the first thing she knew that something was wrong was when she looked at Jack and saw that he had a quizzical look on his face. And that was her word: "quizzical." What would have caused that? And it had to be before he was shot in the throat because we know what his reaction to that was: panic and fear as he raised his hands to his throat. That wasn't quizzical. That was alarm and fright. So, it must have been before that that he looked quizzical. Why?

Well, no one would respond to being shot in the back with a bullet with a quizzical look. But, he wasn't shot in the back with a bullet. He was shot in the back with an ice flechette which felt like nothing more than a mosquito bite. It caused only a very superficial wound in his back. And, it contained a drug, a nerve agent, which started to affect him, changing the way he felt. He felt like he was losing control of his muscles, which were seizing up, and he felt that his mind was going. He felt doped, and he was doped.

There are good grounds to believe it because, post-sign in the Z-film, JFK was completely out of it mentally. Why would a shot to his back that barely traumatized him at all impair his mind? It wouldn't. It couldn't. It didn't. But, he became totally incapacitated mentally even though there was no damage to his brain until the fatal head shot.

So, what accounts for his complete loss of mind? A nerve agent. And we know what nerve agent it was because CIA Director William Colby, who went on to be murdered, told us. He said it was shellfish toxin. He was describing the novel weapon that was examined at the Church Committe meeting in 1975, the so-called "heart attack gun."

Of course, he didn't say it was linked to the JFK assassination. But, he was the Director of the CIA, so he couldn't say that. But, everything he said about it fit the JFK assassination.

The other thing that supports that JFK was not shot in the back with a bullet is that no bullet was ever found. There was no bullet there in his back when Humes autopsied him. And no bullet was found in his clothes or on the seat or on the floor of the car. There was no bullet, period. But, if he was shot in the back with an ice flechette, then the ice melted, and there was nothing left. It fits perfectly.

Don't believe what you see in the Zapruder film. It tells a lie. It's story that JFK was smiling and waviing until he disappeared behind the freeway sign is a lie. The truth is that he was shot in the back high on the hill with an unconventional weapon; one that had never been used before; and one that has never been talked about except that one time at the Church Committee. But, the JFK community needs to start talking about it.