Someone retorted that Lowery is still clasping his hands because not enough time has passed since the shot, a mere fraction of a second; that he didn't have time to react. But no, that isn't possible because Oswald has already reacted. He reacted vocally, and he reacted by slapping his left arm to his chest, which I don't think anyone has ever done before or since in the history of shooting victims. But, the point is that if he had time to do all that, then Lowery certainly had time to react to the shot.
We are talking about a startle reaction, and it is a reflex. You understand that when you lift your hand off a hot stove that it's a reflex. You do it before you have the conscious thought to do it. It's instantaneous. And if a gunshot goes off in a police garage, the startle reaction would certainly manifest, even in cops, because they too are human beings.
So, the fact is that there is no excuse for him standing like that.
And it means something. It means that the scene was staged; that it was posed, arranged, and directed. And remember: I am a filmmaker, and I know about staging scenes. My current movie, His Stretch of Texas Ground, is streaming on Amazon now, and my 4th movie, Joe Haladin: The Case of the Missing Sister, is going to be shot in March and directed by me. And the shooting of the Jackson photo was a case of extremely bad directing. Whoever was in charge stunk.
And if the scene isn't real then the whole event, of Ruby shooting Oswald, wasn't real. And that should make you mad because not only did they frame a poor innocent man (Jack Ruby) who was actually a very decent and rather childlike being, but they turned all of us into Pavlov dogs, manipulating us with rigged stimuli and playing us for fools.
That Jack Ruby was innocent is the most explosive truth there is about the whole JFK assassination because that was their best kept secret. Until recently, NOBODY doubted it. Sure, people argued about whether Ruby did it alone or if the Mafia put him up to it, but nobody doubted that he did it. That was off the table, but now it's on the table. And yes, to this day, if you try to tell people about it, they immediately scoff at it with the usual:
"But, millions saw him do it on television." (No, they saw a short, chubby middle-aged man do it whose face never came into view, and if you look closely at his features and compare them to Ruby's, including his height, you'll realize that he wasn't Ruby)
"But, Ruby admitted doing it." (No, Ruby accepted that he did it. Big difference. He said he had no memory of doing it. How can you admit doing something that you don't remember doing?)
"But, people in the garage saw Ruby do it and recognized him." (The only ones who claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage were the Dallas Police. Not one reporter claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage. After it was all over, and they were told that it was Ruby, some of them were pressured to testify as though they knew who the shooter was before it was announced. They would say things like: Ruby did this; Ruby did that; but they were merging their recollections with the official story that they heard and were being pressured to accept, and I mean as strongly as you're being pressured to get the Covid vaccine. But, all you have to do is watch the footages, particularly the NBC and KLRD ones, and you'll hear the conversations that went on. None of the reporters referred to Ruby. Instead they were wondering who the shooter was. They referred to the man, the shooter, etc., but nobody said it was Ruby. They found out about it the same way everyone else did: from the Dallas Police announcing it and parading Ruby around afterwards.)
"But, what about the Dallas Police then? If they said they saw and recognized Ruby in the garage before the shooting, why shouldn't we believe them?" (Because the Dallas Police killed Oswald, and I'm sure they did it at the behest of Lyndon Johnson. Johnson must have told them that the Kennedys deserve closure, that the country needs to move on, that a long trial would be paralyzing; that a guilty verdict and death sentence were inevitable anyway, so let's save time, etc. And remember that Oswald was supposedly a cop killer, and they all knew and liked Tippit. I don't know who pulled the trigger to actually put the lethal bullet into Oswald after he was brought inside the jail office. I have a suspicion of who it was, but it isn't strong enough to post.)
Jack Ruby was innocent, and his framing has to be the most Machiavellian scheme ever concocted. It truly is breathtaking, to this day. It's breathtaking they could even conceive of it, let alone do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.