So, you want proof that Kennedy was in trouble- impaired and incapacitated- before he was shot in the throat? Before what is usually considered to be the first shot that hit him? OK, I'll give it to you.
Take a look at the Willis photo. It supposedly was taken before JFK was hit; right before he was hit. But, he isn't waving in that photo.
This was a political trip. Its purpose was to garner votes for the 1964 election; to win Texas. You saw how he was throughout the motorcade: smiling, waving, engaging, and Jackie too. But, he isn't doing any of that, and neither is Jackie. She is turned to her right, looking at him. Why isn't she working her side of the street? She knew that something was wrong with him. And notice that his image looks very sketchy. It isn't all that photographic. So, they may have taken out the paint. But regardless, he is not waving. His arm is down.
We're told that he was about to be shot there, that this was a split-second before the Magic Bullet hit him. But, I tell you that he was already shot there- in the back- and what was coming was the throat shot.
But, let's look at the image that came before this one, the Betzner photo.
If you look closely, you'll see that JFK was not waving there either. Note that I don't grant the authenticity of the man who looms large on the left side of the photo. I don't think anyone, amateur or professional, would take a photo like that when all they had to do was take a half step to the right to get around that guy. So, I suspect that he was added to the photo to keep us from seeing something. Perhaps it was Jackie showing interest and concern at a time when, supposedly, he wasn't shot yet. Let's take one step more back to the Croft photo.
This puts us just a little past the Obelisk. If you look at the man on the far right, he was just a few feet west of the Obelisk.
Kennedy was already shot in the back there. They even put a screen over the spot where he was hit.
So, they put an oblong screen there. It must have caused a visible disruption when he was shot. Remember, the missile was made of ice, and it basically exploded upon hitting him. And here again, he wasn't waving. So, from right below the Obelisk, he stopped waving. In the Zapruder film, it looks like he put his hand over his face, but he didn't do that.
They did that. He was looking freaked out, and they wanted to cover it. But, getting back to Croft:
That image of Jackie's face is bogus. They took it from a televised video she made thanking Americans for their cards and letters of sympathy.
Are you still doubting it? Look how dour she looks. Why? Supposedly, JFK hasn't been shot yet. Supposedly, nothing has happened yet. So, why isn't she smiling and waving like a good political wife? Most likely, even there, she sensed that something was wrong and was starting to turn towards him. They replaced that with what you see above. Why didn't they replace it with a picture of her smiling? Like this, for instance:
So, why didn't they use something like that, since, supposedly, nothing had happened yet? Isn't that how she should have looked? Well, the answer that you have to use what works, what fits. And by the way, that's how her hair was. It wasn't like we see in the Croft photo.
So, in the Croft photo, her hair is plastered down and had an unusual wave to it, almost a kink. On the right, which was the day of the assassination, her hair had a lot of body, and it was lying very differently. That can't possibly be her on the same day.
So, you should realize that when they foist the Croft photo on us, trying to pass that off as Jackie, they are shitting on us.
But, the most important thing is: why did they do it? They did it because JFK was shot in the back, and he rode down the hill that way. And then, when he finally passed the sign, he was shot a second time in the throat.
Now, the shot to the back was NOT intended to be a kill shot. It was a preparatory shot. It was to butter him up. They did not want the killing to commence high on the hill because there were too many people up there watching. They didn't want so many eyes on it. They wanted it to happen down the hill, across from the pergola. That's where it was to start, and it would continue until he was dead.
But, I don't believe the second shot was a kill shot either. I think it was another flechette. After all, no bullet was ever found in his throat. Dr. Perry fished around looking for it. He even cut the strap muscles to look for it. But, he never found it. And the x-rays they took of Kennedy certainly would have shown a metal bullet. No bullet was found in his back by the autopsy doctors, and no bullet was found in his throat by Dr. Perry. I don't think either one was a bullet. I think both were what Jack White called a "blood soluble round."
So, they shot him in the back to deliver the nerve agent to disable him, physically and mentally. And they shot him in the throat, I believe, for two reasons. The first was to disable his speaking ability, and the second was to create a wound which they could later say was the exit wound for the shot in his back.
And that's exactly what happened. Late that night, without dissecting the tracks of the back wound and the throat wound, they just announced that it was all one track from a single bullet. How could they know that without dissecting it? And why didn't they just dissect it? Well, they couldn't dissect it because it wasn't all one track. I don't know what Humes really thought, but the men above him were not going to let him go back and dissect those wounds. Insteady, they were just going to lip-flap it. Do it by fiat. "Yup. It's all one wound. You hear me?"
Now, I've given you proof that JFK stopped waving from Croft to Willis. He wasn't waving or engaging or interacting or whatever word you want to us. And that's because he was stricken. He was shot high on the hill with a nerve agent that acted fast, and it overwhelmed him. And Jackie, unwittingly, gave it away. She wasn't trying to be a trouble maker, but she was when she told the Warren Commission that when she first turned and looked at Jack, he had a "quizzical" look on his face. Interesting choice of word, but alternatively, she could have said confused, bewildered, or even unglued. But, that is what happened: he rode down the hill having been shot in the back with a nerve agent that quickly undermined him and progressively led to full-blown catatonia.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.