Nancy Tankersley
Look up JFK poisoned and it will bring up a study by Salerian (2010) of the possibility of a neurotoxin induced state induced by a flechette to the spinal column (the small insignificant back wound?). And why not? It looks like the CIA had the troops out, and everybody wanted to be there so overkill was better than taking any risks.
- Like
- Reply
- Share
- Edited
Ralph Cinque
Author
Nancy Tankersley I know him. Dr. Alen Salerian. He asked me to co-author a paper about this which he submitted to a medical journal. I don't know that it got published, and I doubt it because political correctness looms everywhere. But, if people would just get past the knee-jerk reaction to reject this because it sounds so wild, then they will start to realize that it does make sense. A metal bullet could not have caused such a shallow wound in JFK's back. And if, hypothetically, it had, then it would have been found there in his back. But, there was no bullet found. And it didn't fall out or get dug out. The falling out is ridiculous. But, it wasn't dug out either because if it had been, it would have disturbed the wound. The thing about ice is that it's very hard, but it's also unstable. Remember, it's a crystal, and it's full of empty space. It's not as solid as it seems. An ice dart could be designed to burst on impact, so that it's gone. Now, the flechette for the umbrella gun, which is Alen's main interest, that wasn't ice. It was something else that was stable at ambient temperature but would melt quickly at body temperature. . Both the back shot and throat shot were flechettes but made of different materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.