Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 Roger Scott Cathey asked me to redo my posing as the stricken Oswald in the Jackson photo, and I have done so. He wanted my right hand to be higher, like Oswald's is, and I have done that.

There are still some very important differences. My left thumb on my chest is not turned as much as his, and that's because it's impossible to turn it as much as his. One doesn't have a muscle with which to do it. In fact, you can't even twist it that way with your other hand.

And the same goes for my right thumb, which I couldn't turn as much as his because it just isn't possible. So, you see that my nail is sideways, compared to his. His exposes much more of the nail. His puts the nail above the pad of the thumb, while on me, they are side by side. It is a joint limitation.

And notice that my left sleeve goes straight across, and his does too. So, what is that weird jog that the material makes on him? It's nothing real. No, it is not a fold in the sweater. It's actually the sleeve of the right arm. It took a long time to figure that out, and Craig Roberts is the one who did it.

But now, I want to point out that it is beholden on my adversaries to duplicate the photo. They're the ones who are claiming that it's natural, spontaneous, and unmanipulated. Of course, it's absolutely impossible to do it without manipulation. My pose is manipulated too. I was manipulating my hands to try to match Oswald. If I were just slapping my left arm to my chest and thrusting my right hand forward, it wouldn't look anything like that. In other words, I wouldn't contort my hands, and I couldn't contort my hands without thinking about. And that's another mark against the Jackson photo because why, upon being shot, would Oswald think about what he was doing with his hands? Of course, he wouldn't. And it couldn't come to that without thinking about it.

However, I don't mind if my adversaries try to contrive the look of Oswald because I had to contrive it just to try to get close to it. Human anatomy is what it is, and you can't do the impossible.

But, the chilling thing is that my adversaries may have tried. They may have tried to duplicate it, if only in the mirror, but then not submitted anything because they failed to produce anything good.

But, if that's the case, shouldn't they admit it? Shouldn't they admit that I am right, that duplicating Oswald's geometry in the Jackson photo is impossible?

So, now their lack of submissions takes a darker tone. It's possible that they know that I'm right that reproducing the Jackson photo is impossible. And if it's a bogus image, it means that it is a bogus story. It means that Jack Ruby is innocent, just as I have been saying. And it means that they are willing to be accessories to the cover-up that has been going on for 61 years.